Hi!
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 03:31:00PM +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> Пн 23 июл 2018 @ 16:52 Sean Whitton :
>
> > Found what I had in mind, in the REJECT-FAQ:
> >
> > "If the upstream tarball does not include a copy of the license,
> > debian/copyright must document when and how the license informa
Пн 23 июл 2018 @ 16:52 Sean Whitton :
> Found what I had in mind, in the REJECT-FAQ:
>
> "If the upstream tarball does not include a copy of the license,
> debian/copyright must document when and how the license information was
> obtained (i.e. include "Downloaded by John Doe on 2008-12-24 from
>
Hello,
On Mon 23 Jul 2018 at 01:05PM +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> When I searched the Debian Policy for "license" I was not able to find
> any requirement of the mentioned sort. And the section 2.3 is about
> debian/copyright file (which is installed as
> /usr/share/doc/package/copyright), not LI
Пн 23 июл 2018 @ 14:31 Sean Whitton :
> On Mon 23 Jul 2018 at 10:31AM +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
>
>> Could you provide a concrete link to such requirement, please?
>
> Hmm. I was thinking of the first sentence of section 2.3, but that's
> not actually the requirement, so perhaps it is not in Pol
Hello,
On Mon 23 Jul 2018 at 10:31AM +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> Could you provide a concrete link to such requirement, please?
Hmm. I was thinking of the first sentence of section 2.3, but that's
not actually the requirement, so perhaps it is not in Policy after all,
sorry.
--
Sean Whitton
Пн 23 июл 2018 @ 07:43 Sean Whitton :
> On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 06:26PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
>> In the past FTPMaster has emailed me stating that upstream sources
>> must contain a full-text copy of the appropriate license.
>
> Debian Policy does indeed says something about this.
Could
Hello,
On Sun 22 Jul 2018 at 06:26PM -0400, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> In the past FTPMaster has emailed me stating that upstream sources
> must contain a full-text copy of the appropriate license.
Debian Policy does indeed says something about this.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 10:07:20AM +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> Сб 21 июл 2018 @ 15:41 Nicholas D Steeves :
>
> > https://github.com/emacs-php/apache-mode/
> > + more up-to-date
> > + tags releases
> > + could also become the version people come to expect, because it's
> >on MELPA
> > - no
Сб 21 июл 2018 @ 15:41 Nicholas D Steeves :
> https://github.com/emacs-php/apache-mode/
> + more up-to-date
> + tags releases
> + could also become the version people come to expect, because it's
>on MELPA
> - no description or documentation beyond the short description
>and a code sni
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 07:08:26AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Nicholas D Steeves writes:
>
> > https://github.com/martenjj/apachemode is also by Jonathan Marten
> > - Notes that it merges the features of three forks back into the
> > original.
> > https://github.com/emacs-php/apache-mode
Hi Sean,
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 10:36:01PM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Jul 03 2018, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
>
> > What about in the case of forks? Eg: goodies' apache-mode is the
> > original, by Jonathan Marten.
>
> I still don't see any need for an ITP.
Awesome, less
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 03 2018, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> What about in the case of forks? Eg: goodies' apache-mode is the
> original, by Jonathan Marten.
I still don't see any need for an ITP.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Nicholas D Steeves writes:
> https://github.com/martenjj/apachemode is also by Jonathan Marten
> - Notes that it merges the features of three forks back into the
> original.
> https://github.com/emacs-php/apache-mode/ is a fork by Karl Chen, and
> I wonder if it would be as smooth of a tran
Hi!
Thank you for your comments, they are much appreciated :-)
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 08:21:41AM +0100, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Jun 25 2018, Nicholas D. Steeves wrote:
>
> > P.S. Will RFSs or ITPs need to be filed for each of the 90
> > emacs-goodies-el subpackages? :-/
>
> I
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 25 2018, Nicholas D. Steeves wrote:
> P.S. Will RFSs or ITPs need to be filed for each of the 90
> emacs-goodies-el subpackages? :-/
ITPs definitely not. They are not new in Debian.
I would suggest a joint RFS containing all of them.
--
Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Descrip
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 08:45:58AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>
> There is a newer version of apache-mode available from
>
> https://github.com/emacs-php/apache-mode/
>
> We should track package that instead; this will also more or less solve
> the reported problem at least on a per system basi
control: retitle -1 replace apache-mode.el with elpa-apache-mode
control: user debian-emacsen@lists.debian.org
control: usertag +elpify
There is a newer version of apache-mode available from
https://github.com/emacs-php/apache-mode/
We should track package that instead; this will also more or
17 matches
Mail list logo
