Nicholas D Steeves writes:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 07:13:00PM +0800, David Bremner wrote:
>>
>> Dima Kogan writes:
>> >
>> > For MY use case I don't even need all that because I can simply replace
>> > (shell-command-make-prompt-string " [%w]%$ " default-directory)
>> > with
>> > (format "
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 07:13:00PM +0800, David Bremner wrote:
>
> Dima Kogan writes:
> >
> > For MY use case I don't even need all that because I can simply replace
> > (shell-command-make-prompt-string " [%w]%$ " default-directory)
> > with
> > (format " [%s]$ " (directory-file-name (a
Dima Kogan writes:
>
> I don't think anything here is worth maintaining. If this goes away,
> should we think about how to not blow up peoples' existing usages?
Perhaps a wiki page with config snippet suggestions?
Or more documentation in emacs-goodies-el README.Debian
d
David Bremner writes:
>> It looks like much of shell-command is already available in emacs
>> itself, so if there're any pieces that should be preserved, where should
>> they go?
>
> Into a separate package if they are substantial enough to warrant it.
> If not, that's a bit trickier. If it's ju
Hi Dima,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 01:27:51AM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote:
> David Bremner writes:
>
> > Are you willing to maintain it upstream? Because the plan is that
> > emacs-goodies-el is not going to be upstream for anything anymore.
>
> Hi. I just looked at it. If emacs-goodies-el isn't upst
Dima Kogan writes:
> David Bremner writes:
>
>> Are you willing to maintain it upstream? Because the plan is that
>> emacs-goodies-el is not going to be upstream for anything anymore.
>
> Hi. I just looked at it. If emacs-goodies-el isn't upstream for
> anything, then where are the upstream sour
David Bremner writes:
> Are you willing to maintain it upstream? Because the plan is that
> emacs-goodies-el is not going to be upstream for anything anymore.
Hi. I just looked at it. If emacs-goodies-el isn't upstream for
anything, then where are the upstream sources coming from? Are there
mult
Dima Kogan writes:
>>Are you willing to maintain it upstream? Because the plan is that
>>emacs-goodies-el is not going to be upstream for anything anymore.
>
> Possibly. Let me look at it when I get back in a few weeks.
Sounds good, it's waited all these years for attention, it can wait a
few mo
Dima Kogan writes:
> On June 25, 2018 4:20:39 AM PDT, David Bremner wrote:
>>
>>control: retitle -1 "emacs-goodies-el: remove shell-command.el"
>>control: severity -1 important
>>
>>It seems no-one cares for this library (no new version since
>>2009?). Since it seems broken, it seems like a bad
On June 25, 2018 4:20:39 AM PDT, David Bremner wrote:
>
>control: retitle -1 "emacs-goodies-el: remove shell-command.el"
>control: severity -1 important
>
>It seems no-one cares for this library (no new version since
>2009?). Since it seems broken, it seems like a bad idea to release it
>in
>buste
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 08:20:39AM -0300, David Bremner wrote:
>
> It seems no-one cares for this library (no new version since
> 2009?). Since it seems broken, it seems like a bad idea to release it in
> buster.
>
> If you know of a live upstream version of this, please let me know.
Would the f
11 matches
Mail list logo
