On 7 Jul 1999, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> > "Rafael" == Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rafael> --- Start of forwarded message ---
> Rafael> From: Per Abrahamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Rafael> The specific issue is that Debian is distributing an alpha
>
> "Adam" == Adam Di Carlo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Adam> For instance, I think the recent "ultra forkage" proposed by
Adam> Karl
Adam> M. Hegbloom is ill-conceived in the extreme. It must be one
Adam>of the
Adam> worst ideas I have heard in a very long time.
Uh...
> "Rafael" == Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rafael> --- Start of forwarded message ---
Rafael> From: Per Abrahamsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rafael> The specific issue is that Debian is distributing an alpha
Rafael> version of Gnus as the default Gnus for X
I've been thinking about this issue lately. On one hand, I think the
XEmacs maintainers are a being a bit extreme. On the other hand, they
have a good point.
Let me start by saying I have seen a very disturbing trend in Debian
to bad-mouth upstream maintainers. Even very senior people in Debia
I suppose that many of you have seen the message below posted elsewhere,
but I think that the discussion fits perfectly in debian-devel and
debian-emacsen.
This message was preceeded by criticisms to Debian (not to say bashing)
coming from XEmacs developers at the gnu.emacs.gnus newsgroup in a th
5 matches
Mail list logo
