Previously J?r?me Marant wrote:
> Wichert, you're so predictable that we could emulate you with
> a two states Turing machine ;-)
Excellent. If you could please implement that before saturday I won't
be missed during vacation :)
Wichert.
--
Previously Roland Mas wrote:
> . o O ( I hope the vi guys won't start a holy war against me... )
We won't. We don't care about such bloat :)
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| [EM
Previously [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If someone would like to take it, have a look at it, then sponsor
> it, please do. If you do, tell me, so that I could try to talk
> Wichert Ackerman into Suggests:ing dpkg-dev-emacs in dpkg-dev (grovel,
> grovel, I'm just a poor NM applicant :-).
At the ve
Previously Takuo KITAME wrote:
> Any comments?
Yes, it's an evil patch because it a) will put the file in the
current directory, which can be anywhere, and b) it doesn't
check if the file already exists, and c) it means you won't
see errors.
Wichert.
--
__
4 matches
Mail list logo