Re: Some XEmacs issues and proposals

2005-06-02 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Holger Schauer (2005-06-01) writes: > On 4290 September 1993, Ralf Angeli wrote: > >> I don't consider it uncommon that people have software installed >> manually which is also available via the package system. Reasons >> could be special build options or the n

Re: Some XEmacs issues and proposals

2005-05-31 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Holger Schauer (2005-05-31) writes: > I wear glasses, but I'm not blind. Referring on a Debian list to a manual > installation of a package that Debian distributes as a Debian package is > a red herring. I don't consider it uncommon that people have software installed manually which is also ava

Re: Some XEmacs issues and proposals

2005-05-31 Thread Ralf Angeli
* Holger Schauer (2005-05-30) writes: > On 4281 September 1993, Ralf Angeli wrote: >> following up on a discussion from the xemacs-beta mailing list I'd >> like to point out some issues with the XEmacs package Debian is >> providing and suggest possible remedies.

Re: Some XEmacs issues and proposals

2005-05-24 Thread Ralf Angeli
* OHURA Makoto (2005-05-24) writes: >> Anyway, XEmacs still picks up at least one wrong file. So taking >> aside /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp because it is under the package >> system's control, I think at least /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp >> should not be added to XEmacs' load-path in order t

Some XEmacs issues and proposals

2005-05-22 Thread Ralf Angeli
Hi everybody, following up on a discussion from the xemacs-beta mailing list I'd like to point out some issues with the XEmacs package Debian is providing and suggest possible remedies. The problems are affecting AUCTeX to some extent, so I will refer to it as an example when appropriate. 1) /us