Bug#1030346: elpa-transient: FTBFS with TeXInfo 7.0.x

2023-07-10 Thread Preuße
Control: severity -1 serious On 03.02.2023 12:17, Hilmar Preusse wrote: Hello, For now TeXInfo 7.0 is available in experimental. This bug is not RC for now, but after bookworm we'll upload TeXInfo 7.0 to unstable and the bug will become RC. I've uploaded TexInfo 7.0.x to unstable, your packa

Bug#1030346: elpa-transient: FTBFS with TeXInfo 7.0.x

2023-02-03 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 03.02.2023 um 12:17 teilte Hilmar Preusse mit: Hi, The easiest solution is probably to collect the docs from the new location, specified in d/elpa-transient-doc.docs, but that needs to be verified. Probably not the best idea; this way the package becomes incompatible to TeXinfo 6.8. Rather

Re: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-26 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 23.01.11 Faheem Mitha (fah...@email.unc.edu) wrote: Hi, > I'd like to get a fix uploaded for #610714 for auctex in squeeze. > This should be straightforward. The fix breaks preview with the > version of ghostscript in squeeze (8.71~dfsg2-6.1), and was patched > in upstream CVS in October 2010

Re: NMU for http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610714? (auctex)

2011-01-23 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 23.01.11 Faheem Mitha (fah...@email.unc.edu) wrote: Hi, > I'd like to get a fix uploaded for #610714 for auctex in squeeze. > This should be straightforward. The fix breaks preview with the > version of ghostscript in squeeze (8.71~dfsg2-6.1), and was patched > in upstream CVS in October 2010