Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-10-01 Thread Nicolas Duboc
On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:57:26PM -0400, Raimund Kohl-Fuechsle wrote: > Nicolas Duboc wrote: > >On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:49:18PM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm maintaining zile, a small Emacs clone in terminal mode.

Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-09-29 Thread Nicolas Duboc
so as to be higher than e3 (zile is nearer to emacs than e3em). According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=386496 it will give us : - e3em 10 - zile 12 - emacs-snapshot 23 - emacs2023 - emacs2124 Thanks, -- Nicolas Dubo

Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-09-27 Thread Nicolas Duboc
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 06:49:18PM +0200, Nicolas Duboc wrote: >Hi, > > I'm maintaining zile, a small Emacs clone in terminal mode. It provides > emacs key bindings, buffers and even a lisp config file. But of course > it is lighter and do not aim at being a complete r

Re: Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-09-15 Thread Nicolas Duboc
e me. I agree and I do not aim at including zile in base. > Of course, you can (an should, if it isn't already the case) make zile > an alternative for editor(1) It is already. Regards, -- Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpl8NVeVcMka.pgp Description: PGP signature

Zile as an emacs alternative

2006-09-14 Thread Nicolas Duboc
emacs (#387164). What do you think of this ? What priority should I assign to zile if this alternative is acceptable ? Thanks, (Please, Cc me, I'm not subscribed to the list.) -- Nicolas Duboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pgpGz7NdSg6rH.pgp Description: PGP signature