As requested
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
On 14079 March 1977, Thomas Koch wrote:
> So:
> - one debian package per elpa package?
*EEE*
> - one big elpa-small-packages package?
Maybe not one big one, but one per "topic". Like "packages around
ido/magit", "packages for UI changes", ...
--
bye, Joerg
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah, I'll do something like that if I can't find the problem soon.
> (I was wrong before; it doesn't run as root either)
The copy of the debian-startup.el didnt help?
--
bye Joerg
2.5 million B.C.: OOG the Open Source Caveman develops the axe and
Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So far the Debian startup is _not_ happening and I haven't figured out
> why.
I have a locally compiled CVS Emacs too and i needed to copy
debian-startup.el from usr/share/emacs/site-lisp to
usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp to get that working.
--
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is emacs19 supported? I noticed emacs19 is only in stable, not
> unstable, I'm not sure how to interprete that.
Why do you need such an old emacs?
We have emacs20 and emacs21 in unstable and testing.
> Any interest in having a emacs18 package? The
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just discovered this file on my system. The timestamp on the file
> corresponds to when I ran "dselect" last night.
> Compiling /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/semantic/document-vars.el...
[]
Sounds like semantic-beta:
semantic-beta: Compile
Glyn Millington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Help! Can ayone tell me what's going on here?
Looks like #140968
> Debian woody
> emacs21.2-1 plus the Gnus which comes with it.
> bbdb 2.34.cvs200204
Which Version ? Thats not the complete version :)
> ;;;fire up bbdb put this last
> (require '
7 matches
Mail list logo
