Re: Gnus Manual License

2006-10-04 Thread James Troup
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why was the gnus manual removed from the gnus package? It has cover texts. According to: http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 (Specifically: """This means that works that don't include any Invariant Sections, Cover Texts, Acknowledgements,

Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-01 Thread James Troup
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Browsing through the wishlist bugs on xemacs21-packages, I've seen > several requests for the ability to remove parts of the XEmacs > support code, either to save disk space or to replace them with > newer upstream versions. I really don't buy the sav

Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-01 Thread James Troup
Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've made a first rough version of a splitting of > xemacs21-{base,mule}support into individual packages. These packages > are at Err, is this some sort of May 1st joke? Please tell me this isn't intended for upload into the archive proper. 73 new