On 4282 September 1993, J. wrote:
> I think this requires some changes in the policy:
> Common .el files could be installed in /usr{,/local}/share/emacsen/site-lisp
> which is not a standard location in Emacsen's path.
> It would replace /usr/{,/local}/share/emacs/site-lisp in both Emacsen
> paths
On 4290 September 1993, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> * Holger Schauer (2005-05-31) writes:
>> I wear glasses, but I'm not blind. Referring on a Debian list to a manual
>> installation of a package that Debian distributes as a Debian package is
>> a red herring.
> I don'
Ralf Angeli wrote:
> * Holger Schauer (2005-05-30) writes:
> If /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp were a directory to be used by
> XEmacs then why isn't it included in XEmacs' paths.h or found by
> (paths-find-site-lisp-directory '("/usr/local"))
>
Moin Ralf, dear list,
On 4281 September 1993, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> following up on a discussion from the xemacs-beta mailing list I'd
> like to point out some issues with the XEmacs package Debian is
> providing and suggest possible remedies.
First of all, I should mention that I'm unaware of an
"RM" == Roland Mas schrieb am Sun, 26 Aug 2001 14:10:36 +0200:
RM> There are obviously more to come. I might "reject" some
RM> suggestions though (some for which the license is not clear), or
RM> split them into other packages.
I might suggest scanning through the Emacs Lisp List and ne
5 matches
Mail list logo
