Package: elpa-dpkg-dev-el
Version: 37.10
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Setting up elpa-dpkg-dev-el (37.10) ...
Install emacsen-
Package: compat-el
Version: 29.1.4.1-2
Severity: serious
elpa-hl-todo/sid is currently uninstallable since it depends on
elpa-compat (>= 29.1.4.2).
Andreas
Package: elpa-snakemake
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From
On 23/11/2022 01.11, Sean Whitton wrote:
Hello,
On Tue 22 Nov 2022 at 05:39PM +01, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
On 28/09/2022 16.55, Sean Whitton wrote:
transient is included in Emacs 28 so I'm inclined to leave this to fix
itself when Emacs 28 migrates.
Can't this be expressed as
On 22/11/2022 18.40, Diane Trout wrote:
On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 18:24 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
There needs to be either a
Depends: emacs-el (>= 1:28)
or an equivaent
Breaks: (emacs-el (<< 1:28)
or the installation must be skipped if emacs is too old.
So it looks like elpa-
Package: elpa-snakemake
Version: 2.0.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install if
emacs 27 (currently still in bookworm) is already installed. As
per definition of the release team this makes
On 28/09/2022 16.55, Sean Whitton wrote:
transient is included in Emacs 28 so I'm inclined to leave this to fix
itself when Emacs 28 migrates.
Can't this be expressed as a package relationship?
e.g. Depends: emacs-el (>= 1:28)
Andreas
Package: elpa-ement
Version: 0.1.4-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
This is th
Control: reassign -1 emacs 1:28.1+1-1
Control: retitle -1 emacs: elpa-*: fails to install: libgccjit.so: error: error
invoking gcc driver
I'm seeing the 'error invoking gcc driver' error while installing the
following packages along emacs in sid:
elpa-bind-chord=2.4.1-1
elpa-circe=2.11-2
elpa-d
Control: reassign -1 elpa-elscreen,emacs
Control: found -1 1.4.6-9
Control: found -1 1:28.1+1-3
As I'm seeing this error in a few more emacs packages, this could also
be a problem (missing dependency?) on the emacs side...
Andreas
Package: elpa-elscreen
Version: 1.4.6-9
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From t
Package: elpa-taxy-magit-section
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity
Package: org-mode-doc
Version: 9.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid bookworm
Hi,
please update org-mode-doc to 9.5.2 to match the org-mode version in the
archive:
org-mode | 9.5.2+dfsh-4 | unstable | source, all
org-mode-doc | 9.4.0-2 | unstable/non-free| sourc
Package: projectile-doc
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: normal
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
1m23.7s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/us
Package: git-el,elpa-magit
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Control: found -1 2.99.0.git0957.ge8c7bd03-1
Control: found -1 1:2.30.1-1
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the
Package: elpa-lsp-ui
Version: 6.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the a
Package: elpa-projectile
Version: 2.0.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'stretch'.
It installed fine in 'stretch', then the upgrade to 'buster' fails.
>From the attached log (scro
Package: elpa-graphql
Version: 0.1.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From th
Package: rtags
Version: 2.20-1
Severity: serious
User: trei...@debian.org
Usertags: edos-file-overwrite
Hi,
automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the
same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has
detected the following problem:
Preparing to
Package: emacs-goodies-el
Version: 40.0
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-pol
On 2013-11-21 01:49, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> You are byte-compiling packages under emacs22, which is not part of any
> current Debian distribution and hasn't been since... lenny?
exactly :-)
> Seems to me that the upgrade from 'lenny' to 'squeeze' to 'wheezy' to
> 'jessie' should uninstall ema
21 matches
Mail list logo