Hello,
On Sun 07 May 2023 at 04:42PM -04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Is there a practical argument against adding versioned Provides to
> either emacs-common or emacs-el (as appropriate)? Something like
>
> Provides: elpa-org (= 9.5.5)
>
> The idea is that emacs-common (or -el) would replace
David Bremner writes:
> Note that by filing this bug with severity serious, you are proposing to
> remove elpa-org from bullseye. This might be the right course of action,
> I'm not sure.
>
At this time, this would mean that at least elpa-org-contrib will also
be dropped. I don't know if there
Maxim Nikulin writes:
> Package: elpa-org
> Version: 9.5.2+dfsh-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Installing elpa-org package to current Debian testing (bookworm) results
> in older Org version than Org shipped with Emacs. I consider it as a
> really bad surprise for people who will upgrade from bullse
3 matches
Mail list logo
