mastodon-el_1.0.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 21:26:40 + Source: mastodon-el Binary: elpa-mastodon Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Emacsen team Changed-By: Martin Descriptio

dh-elpa_2.0.14_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 09:18:37 -0300 Source: dh-elpa Architecture: source Version: 2.0.14 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Emacsen team Changed-By: David Bremner Changes: dh-elpa (2.0.14) unstabl

Processing of dh-elpa_2.0.14_source.changes

dh-elpa_2.0.14_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dh-elpa_2.0.14.dsc dh-elpa_2.0.14.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

shut-up_0.3.3-4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 09:53:30 -0300 Source: shut-up Architecture: source Version: 0.3.3-4 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Emacsen team Changed-By: David Bremner Closes: 1020190 Changes: shut-up

Processing of shut-up_0.3.3-4_source.changes

shut-up_0.3.3-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: shut-up_0.3.3-4.dsc shut-up_0.3.3-4.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1020190: marked as done (shut-up: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: build] Error 25)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2022 13:19:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1020190: fixed in shut-up 0.3.3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1020190, regarding shut-up: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: build] Error 25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#1020189: helpful-el: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25

Lucas Nussbaum writes: > Source: helpful-el > Version: 0.19-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. thi

key-chord-el_0.6-6_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 07:37:09 -0300 Source: key-chord-el Architecture: source Version: 0.6-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Emacsen Team Changed-By: David Bremner Closes: 1020197 Changes: key-

Bug#1020192: cycle-quotes: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: build] Error 25

Lucas Nussbaum writes: > Source: cycle-quotes > Version: 0.1-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. >

Bug#1020143: yasnippet: FTBFS: make[1]: *** [debian/rules:7: override_dh_auto_build] Error 255

Lucas Nussbaum writes: > Source: yasnippet > Version: 0.14.0+git20200603.5cbdbf0d-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm > This seems unrelated to native compilation. At a guess, it is because ema

Bug#1020197: marked as done (key-chord-el: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:7: binary] Error 25)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2022 11:05:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#1020197: fixed in key-chord-el 0.6-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #1020197, regarding key-chord-el: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:7: binary] Error 25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Processing of key-chord-el_0.6-6_source.changes

key-chord-el_0.6-6_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: key-chord-el_0.6-6.dsc key-chord-el_0.6-6.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#1020193: pcre2el: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25

Lucas Nussbaum writes: > Source: pcre2el > Version: 1.8-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64. > This

Processed: tagging 1020195

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1020195 - bookworm Bug #1020195 [src:elisp-bug-hunter] elisp-bug-hunter: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25 Removed tag(s) bookworm. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 1020195: h

Bug#1020195: elisp-bug-hunter: FTBFS: make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 25

Lucas Nussbaum writes: > Source: elisp-bug-hunter > Version: 1.3.1+repack-5 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build >

Processed: tagging 1020029

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 1020029 - bookworm Bug #1020029 [src:emacs-deferred] emacs-deferred: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity Removed tag(s) bookworm. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Bug#1020029: emacs-deferred: FTBFS: E: Build killed with signal TERM after 150 minutes of inactivity

Lucas Nussbaum writes: > Source: emacs-deferred > Version: 0.5.1-4 > Severity: serious > Justification: FTBFS > Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs > User: lu...@debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-20220917 ftbfs-bookworm > > Hi, > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build > on amd64.