Bug#973179: pcre2el: FTBFS: tests failed

2020-10-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: pcre2el Version: 1.8-3 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering direct

Bug#973150: emacs-async: FTBFS: Wrong type argument: stringp, nil

2020-10-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: emacs-async Version: 1.9.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > debian/rules build > dh

Bug#973152: yasnippet: FTBFS: Unable to resolve link: "Eligible%20snippets"

2020-10-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: yasnippet Version: 0.14.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering direct

Bug#973132: haskell-mode: FTBFS: tests failed

2020-10-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: haskell-mode Version: 17.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[2]: Entering direct

Bug#973066: esup-el: FTBFS: tests failed

2020-10-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: esup-el Version: 0.7.1-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > make[1]: Entering direct

Bug#973068: undercover-el: FTBFS: tests failed

2020-10-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: undercover-el Version: 0.7.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs Usertags: ftbfs-20201027 ftbfs-bullseye Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > dpkg-buildpack

project-el_0.5.2-2_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-10-27 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:27:12 -0700 Source: project-el Architecture: source Version: 0.5.2-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Emacsen team Changed-By: Sean Whitton Changes: project-el (0.5.2-2)

dh-elpa_2.0.5_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2020-10-27 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 09:23:33 -0700 Source: dh-elpa Architecture: source Version: 2.0.5 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Emacsen team Changed-By: Sean Whitton Closes: 972995 Changes: dh-elpa (2.

Processing of dh-elpa_2.0.5_source.changes

2020-10-27 Thread Debian FTP Masters
dh-elpa_2.0.5_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: dh-elpa_2.0.5.dsc dh-elpa_2.0.5.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Processing of project-el_0.5.2-2_source.changes

2020-10-27 Thread Debian FTP Masters
project-el_0.5.2-2_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: project-el_0.5.2-2.dsc project-el_0.5.2-2.debian.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#972995: marked as done (dh-elpa: fails to read project.el's Package-Requires)

2020-10-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Oct 2020 16:48:27 + with message-id and subject line Bug#972995: fixed in dh-elpa 2.0.5 has caused the Debian Bug report #972995, regarding dh-elpa: fails to read project.el's Package-Requires to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been