I had a conversation with Protesilaos (upstream author) to find out
why they packaged separately for elpa. Here are some of the excerpts:
---
Protesilaos Stavrou writes:
The reason I created separate packages for those is two-fold:
1. I did not know at the time I started how to use a single templ
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package evil-el
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #963581 (http://bugs.debian.org/963581)
#
# bts-link upstream status pull for source package src:elpy
# see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
# https://bts-link-team.pages.debian.net/bts-link/
#
user debian-bts-l...@lists.debian.org
# remote status report for #963647 (http://bugs.debian.org/963647)
3 matches
Mail list logo