emacs-jedi_0.2.7-1_amd64.changes is NEW

binary:elpa-jedi is NEW. binary:elpa-jedi-core is NEW. binary:elpa-jedi-core is NEW. binary:elpa-jedi is NEW. source:emacs-jedi is NEW. Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good OpenPGP sign

Processing of emacs-jedi_0.2.7-1_amd64.changes

emacs-jedi_0.2.7-1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: emacs-jedi_0.2.7-1.dsc emacs-jedi_0.2.7.orig.tar.gz emacs-jedi_0.2.7-1.debian.tar.xz elpa-jedi-core_0.2.7-1_all.deb elpa-jedi_0.2.7-1_all.deb emacs-jedi_0.2.7-1_amd64.buildinfo Greetings,

Bug#903703: emacs-goodies-el: should we keep rfcview.el in Debian?

You wrote: > Package: emacs-goodies-el > Version: 38.0 > Severity: normal > > Hi Dave > > We're trying to clean up some of the less maintained code in > emacs-goodies-el (and repackage the rest). It will help us decide > what to do if you can let us know if you are still actively using and > mai

Bug#903703: emacs-goodies-el: should we keep rfcview.el in Debian?

Package: emacs-goodies-el Version: 38.0 Severity: normal Hi Dave We're trying to clean up some of the less maintained code in emacs-goodies-el (and repackage the rest). It will help us decide what to do if you can let us know if you are still actively using and maintaining rfc-view.el. I noticed