Re: Slimming emacs-nox

2016-07-04 Thread Rob Browning
Jeffrey Walton writes: > To b clear, it does not matter on desktops and servers. > > The pain point (for me) is my BeagleBoard and CubieTruck. Ahh, right -- small devices like that do support the idea of an emacs-min > They usually have 2GB or 4GB of storage, only have 750 MB or so after > inst

Re: Slimming emacs-nox

2016-07-04 Thread Jeffrey Walton
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Rob Browning wrote: > > Jeffrey has suggested removing additional features from emacs-nox to > make it smaller, and so I thought I'd raise the issue here to see what > others think. > > cf. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828702 To b clear, it doe