David Bremner writes:
> Rémi Vanicat writes:
>>
>> I was wondering if it would not be the moment to ask the dash-el debian
>> package maintainer to switch to an elpa style package. We will have more
>> and more package depending on dash-el, and the sooner dash-el integrate
>> into the elpa infra
David Bremner writes:
[...]
> There have been a few bugs in the maintainer scripts (postinst, prerm)
> generated by dh_elpa, and currently the only way to fix those bugs is to
> rebuild the package using a fixed dh_elpa. We could also optimistically
> assume that the rate of bugs in dh_elpa will
Sean Whitton writes:
>> 4) Another thing that has been suggested at some point is
>> auto-rebuilding team packages on a new dh-elpa upload. Because of the
>> generated maintainer scripts, this rebuilding is likely to continue to
>> be required, and it's not very nice for uploaders.
>
> Could you
Hello,
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 11:19:09AM +0100, Rémi Vanicat wrote:
> I was wondering if it would not be the moment to ask the dash-el debian
> package maintainer to switch to an elpa style package. We will have more
> and more package depending on dash-el, and the sooner dash-el integrate
> into
Rémi Vanicat writes:
>
> I was wondering if it would not be the moment to ask the dash-el debian
> package maintainer to switch to an elpa style package. We will have more
> and more package depending on dash-el, and the sooner dash-el integrate
> into the elpa infrastructure, the easier it will b
Sean Whitton writes:
> Hello,
>
Sorry, I'm not actually responding to your question
[...]
>
> After:
> ,
> | EMACSFLAGS = -L /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/dash-el \
I was wondering if it would not be the moment to ask the dash-el debian
package maintainer to switch to an elpa style package. W
6 matches
Mail list logo
