Re: emacs-snapshot or emacs$NUM-snapshot?

2008-08-14 Thread David Kastrup
Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> And could we please call it emacs23-snapshot? >> >> Why? It is a current packaging of the trunk. What feature set >> constitutes "Emacs 23" is an evolving mat

Re: emacs-snapshot or emacs$NUM-snapshot?

2008-08-14 Thread Hilko Bengen
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since you're talking in subjunctive here: are you aware of the > snapshots available from http://emacs.orebokech.com/? No, I wasn't aware of those. Probably because they are not in sid. :-) >> I see two reasons for calling the packages emacs23-snapshot*

Re: emacs-snapshot or emacs$NUM-snapshot?

2008-08-14 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2008-08-14 11:14 +0200, Hilko Bengen wrote: > Even if the feature set for Emacs 23 hasn't been set in stone (and I'd > expect it to stay that way for a while), I think that a set of > -snapshot packages that track development towards Emacs 23 would be > useful for developers and Debian maintain

emacs-snapshot or emacs$NUM-snapshot? (was: ITP: emacs.app -- The GNU Emacs editor on GNUstep)

2008-08-14 Thread Hilko Bengen
David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> And could we please call it emacs23-snapshot? > > Why? It is a current packaging of the trunk. What feature set > constitutes "Emacs 23" is an evolving matter. There is no distinctive > difference between