*Sigh* This thread is long enough, and we seem to be going around in
circles. And the ad hominems are starting. And we're already way off
topic for this list. So I'll try to keep this (relatively) brief.
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:48:23 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> But you can
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 09:15:25 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:19:24 +0200, Daniel Brockman
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Maybe you should ask that question to the
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:19:24 +0200, Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Maybe you should ask that question to the publishers who refused
>>> printing GNU manuals under simpler licenses. There is a _
Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 11:17:01 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Feel free to ask yourself at copyright-clerk at gnu dot org in
>> order to get an official statement.
>
> I will do so if I ever feel like modifying a GNU manual for my own
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
