Re: Gnus Manual License

2006-10-04 Thread Hubert Chan
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 23:09:15 +0200, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I guess that not being able to rename or remove "A GNU Manual" makes >> impossible to make a derivative manual. > Not at all. It just places a requirement on the form a deri

discriminate Womans doing turned on blowjoob!

2006-10-04 Thread Shari
Do you want better viirgin Teenies? http://teens0qx.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Gnus Manual License

2006-10-04 Thread David Kastrup
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le mercredi 04 octobre 2006 16:28, David Kastrup a écrit : > >> The text here differentiates between "invariant sections" and >> "Invariant Sections", seemingly calling the Cover Texts, even though >> the GFDL permits adding to them, an "invariant sectio

Re: Gnus Manual License

2006-10-04 Thread Jérôme Marant
Le mercredi 04 octobre 2006 16:28, David Kastrup a écrit : > > The text here differentiates between "invariant sections" and > "Invariant Sections", seemingly calling the Cover Texts, even though > the GFDL permits adding to them, an "invariant section" which happens > not to be the same as an "In

Re: Gnus Manual License

2006-10-04 Thread Jérôme Marant
Le mercredi 04 octobre 2006 17:03, James Troup a écrit : > Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Why was the gnus manual removed from the gnus package? > > It has cover texts. According to: > > http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 > > (Specifically: > > """This means that works that

Re: Gnus Manual License

2006-10-04 Thread David Kastrup
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Why was the gnus manual removed from the gnus package? > > It has cover texts. According to: > > http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 > > (Specifically: > > """This means that works that don't include a

Re: Gnus Manual License

2006-10-04 Thread David Kastrup
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > Why was the gnus manual removed from the gnus package? > > According to its license, it does not have any invariant section: > > -=-=-=-=-=-=- > > Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document > under the terms of the GNU

Re: Gnus Manual License

2006-10-04 Thread James Troup
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why was the gnus manual removed from the gnus package? It has cover texts. According to: http://www.debian.org/vote/2006/vote_001 (Specifically: """This means that works that don't include any Invariant Sections, Cover Texts, Acknowledgements,

Re: Gnus Manual License

2006-10-04 Thread Sven Joachim
Jérôme Marant wrote: > Why was the gnus manual removed from the gnus package? > > According to its license, it does not have any invariant section: > > -=-=-=-=-=-=- > > Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document > under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,

Gnus Manual License

2006-10-04 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, Why was the gnus manual removed from the gnus package? According to its license, it does not have any invariant section: -=-=-=-=-=-=- Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later versio