Re: Slime ?

2006-01-30 Thread Xavier Maillard
From: Olivier =?utf-8?Q?T=C3=A9tard?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Xavier Maillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > Just curious but why is it in non-free ? I thought it was licensed > under the terms of the GPL. Am I wrong ? Slime is licensed under the GPL but one file (xref.lisp) seems

Re: Slime ?

2006-01-30 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Olivier Tétard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xavier Maillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > > > Just curious but why is it in non-free ? I thought it was licensed > > under the terms of the GPL. Am I wrong ? > > Slime is licensed under the GPL but one file (xref.lisp) seems to be > non-free.

Re: Slime ?

2006-01-30 Thread Olivier Tétard
Xavier Maillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > Just curious but why is it in non-free ? I thought it was licensed > under the terms of the GPL. Am I wrong ? Slime is licensed under the GPL but one file (xref.lisp) seems to be non-free. You can learn more in this thread[1]. 1. http://common-lis

Re: Heads-up: emacs-snapshot now comes in several subflavors

2006-01-30 Thread Sven Joachim
Romain Francoise wrote: Starting with version 20060120-2, it is now possible to install the -x, -gtk and -nox binary packages concurrently. The new alternative `emacs-snapshot' determines which package owns the emacs-snapshot command. There is currently no preference which binary owns the emac