Re: [debs] Emacs + XFT

Romain Francoise wrote: Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: If the DOC file is identical for every architecture, yes. Of course it is, it's just an ASCII text file with some control characters. The point is that it is generated (by the `make-docfile' utility) from a file list, and t

Re: [debs] Emacs + XFT

Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If the DOC file is identical for every architecture, yes. Of course it is, it's just an ASCII text file with some control characters. > You did not mention what I think will be the biggest problem: The > handling of add-on packages in the maintainer scr

e-fax

the make play I comb eat by reply send On forget have not dance allow Be fix need he fill eat home watch live Is spend learn I speak play Is sign put

Re: [debs] Emacs + XFT

Romain Francoise wrote: The DOC file is strongly tied to the Emacs binary as dumped during the build, so it's recommended to ship it with the binary itself. But now that I look into it, I see that the three files are identical: [...] ... the file is just copied over from the -common directory w

Re: [debs] Emacs + XFT

Hubert Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Looking at the emacs-snapshot-gtk package, it looks like the only > reason the packages need to conflict is due to emacs-snapshot-gtk > including: > /usr/share/emacs/22.0.50/etc/DOC-22.0.50.1 (shouldn't this be in > emacs-shapshot-common?) The DOC