XEmacs in a bad shape

2004-01-05 Thread Neil Roeth
On Jan 5, Jérôme Marant ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > FYI, xemacs21 has currently 6 RC bugs and most of them have not > been worked on. The maintainer doesn't seem to be very responsive. > Anyone using XEmacs willing to help? I submitted one of them (206667), and provided the patch for another

XEmacs in a bad shape

2004-01-05 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, FYI, xemacs21 has currently 6 RC bugs and most of them have not been worked on. The maintainer doesn't seem to be very responsive. Anyone using XEmacs willing to help? Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org

Re: Gnus last stable release...

2004-01-05 Thread Sebastian D . B . Krause
Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Changes: >> gnus (5.10.6-1) unstable; urgency=low >> . >>* New upstream release. This is possibly the last stable release before >> new development is unleashed in No Gnus. > > Excuse my bad eng

Gnus last stable release... [was: Re: Accepted gnus 5.10.6-1 (all source)]

2004-01-05 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 17:56:57 -0600 > Source: gnus > Binary: gnus > Architecture: source all > Version: 5.10.6-1 > Distribution: unstable [...] > Changes: > gnus (5.10.6-1) unstable; urgency=low > . >* New upstream release. This is possibly