Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Why? As long as there are comaintainers to maintain those parts of
> > the package, I see no reason for dropping them.
>
> I guess I wasn't clear enough. "leave alone" means "don't touch".
> They won't change.
>
> However, I am considering orp
DEB_MULEUCS_UNICODE=off makes emacs startup many times faster, but
when once a month, someone sends me a utf-8 email, the mail looks
broken. I wish there was a DEB_MULEUCS_UNICODE=auto that would
activate it the first time we encounter unicode this session.
Or, with DEB_MULEUCS_UNICODE=off, there
Hi,
I've seeking comments about the structure of the emacs-goodies-el source
package, which currently produces the following packages:
emacs-goodies-el Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs
emacs-goodies-extra-el Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs -- extra dependencies
devscripts-el Emac
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Yes and no. I think a diminished debian-changelog-mode that only has
> > read-only features (such a bug fetching) would be less overwhelming for
> > users. I don't know maybe not.
> >
> > Should `debian-
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > [I sent this earlier but never saw it appear...]
> > Hi,
>
> ...
>
> > I want to restructure these packages. I intend to leave `devscripts-el'
> > and `gnus-bonus-el' alone, giving control over devs
Quoting Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [I sent this earlier but never saw it appear...]
> Hi,
...
> I want to restructure these packages. I intend to leave `devscripts-el'
> and `gnus-bonus-el' alone, giving control over devscripts-el' to its
> upstream author Junichi Uekawa and find
6 matches
Mail list logo
