Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Then you better start getting policy changed.
>
> > You mean emacs-policy? That's not such a big thing, is it?
>
> If files in /usr/share/emacs/debian-lisp.rc/ directory contain
> configuration information, then that violates general debia
Dave Love <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What we need is an alternate directory that is _not_ under /etc
> > where we could also put Emacs startup files.
>
> This already exists. What we need is _not_ to mess with what Emacs
> does by default, a
On Mon, 19 May 2003 20:04:14 -0400, Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 May 2003 11:54:52 -0400, Peter S Galbraith
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> One solution would be to modif
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2003 11:54:52 -0400, Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> One solution would be to modify emacs to look for, before
> >> default.el and site-start.el, a /usr/share/emacs/d
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 16 May 2003 08:17:51 -0400, Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> > Unfortunately, that's against Debian policy.
>
> And rightly so, I think.
Sure.
> > What we need is an alternate directory that is _not_ under /etc
> >
5 matches
Mail list logo
