Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-02 Thread James LewisMoss
> On Thu, 01 May 2003 20:51:48 -0700, Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Daniel> Honestly, though, I'm getting less and less convinced myself Daniel> that this is a good idea. This is basically the reason I haven't done this. It seemed like a lot of work for basically no gain

Re: Splitting of XEmacs21 elisp packages

2003-05-02 Thread Kai Großjohann
James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I've made a first rough version of a splitting of >> xemacs21-{base,mule}support into individual packages. These packages >> are at > > Err, is this some sort of May 1st joke? Please tell me this isn't > i