Re: sml-mode

2001-10-26 Thread Colin Walters
Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about the patch below? (I just did some cut & paste from the > present thread. Colin and Peter will recognize their words.) Your patch looks good to me. But, I think the Emacs policy is technically frozen, because it's conceptually part of

Re: sml-mode

2001-10-26 Thread Peter S Galbraith
Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-10-26 05:11]: > > > Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > OK. [This "general rule" should be added to the Emacs Policy, then.] > > > > Agreed. > > What about the patch below? (I just did some cut & paste

Re: sml-mode

2001-10-26 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001-10-26 05:11]: > Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > OK. [This "general rule" should be added to the Emacs Policy, then.] > > Agreed. What about the patch below? (I just did some cut & paste from the present thread. Colin and Peter will

Re: sml-mode

2001-10-26 Thread Colin Walters
Jens Peter Secher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK. [This "general rule" should be added to the Emacs Policy, then.] Agreed. > Hmm, well, there are /many/ emacs add-ons. Each individual user > might want some particular add-on. If I were administering a site > with thousands of users, I would