[ Please remove the Cc to debian-devel in replies. I just wanted to
make sure everyone on debian-devel at least saw that this was about
to be discussed, but let's carry on the rest of the conversation on
debian-emacsen. Please do maintain the cc to the bug tracker.
Thanks ]
I'm going to
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Add to that a mechanism for building a dir file out of
> snippets that programs can place in a directory, and debian can dump
> its confusing install-info script that behave nothing like the
> upstream install-info command (which debian does
> On 22 Jan 2001 00:19:02 -0600
> "RB" == Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
RB> Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> is here,
>> http://people.debian.org/~kitame/emacs21/
>>
>> Just test, quick and dirty package.
RB> Just to check, you're not planning to be the emacs21 ma
Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> is here,
> http://people.debian.org/~kitame/emacs21/
>
> Just test, quick and dirty package.
Just to check, you're not planning to be the emacs21 maintainer are
you? I had planned to do that, so if you were as well, we'd probably
need to talk :>
--
Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> dpkg-dev-emacsen and dpkg-dev-el have been suggested too, I guess so
> that Xemacs/EINE/ZWEI or other Emacs variants users are not
> jealous. I have no strong opinion for or against any one of these
> names.
I have a slight preference for dpkg-dev-emacs
I know it's been ages, but do you have an emacs-level fix for this?
If you do, I'd be happy to include it in emacs20 as long as it doesn't
break any expected upstream behavior...
Kirk Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> xterm now has the following resource set:
>
> *VT100.Translations: \
>
6 matches
Mail list logo
