Re: Bug#514039: backscatter on the debian-edu list, again

2009-03-13 Thread David Moreno
On 12:42 Sun 01 Mar 2009, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Don Armstrong wrote: > > I've already droped in rules to deal with this; the previous ones > > hadn't taken effect due to a warning that I didn't catch. > > Thanks. > > > It doesn't really matter to me what you folks decid

Re: Bug#514039: backscatter on the debian-edu list, again

2009-03-01 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Don, Am 2009-03-01 11:16:33, schrieb Don Armstrong: > We already discard everything that matches FROM_DAEMON. Hmmm, interesting since I have goten such spam which went filtered by my own procmail rules and they came from the Debian lists. Good, maybe it was an accident that it had not wor

Re: Bug#514039: backscatter on the debian-edu list, again

2009-03-01 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009, Michelle Konzack wrote: > However, a very well ammount of this backscatters on the Debian > lists can very easyly filtered... > > No one here write with > > root@ > no-reply@ > noreply@ > mailer-daemon@ > info@ > serv

Re: Bug#514039: backscatter on the debian-edu list, again

2009-03-01 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello Holger and Listmasters, since December 2008, the backscatters I receive is now increased to over 1200%, which mean, I get per day over 3000!!! Some of this A...s are even attaching the whole origial messages (sometimes up to several 100kBytes) to it and it shows me, that the Us

Re: Bug#514039: backscatter on the debian-edu list, again

2009-03-01 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Holger Levsen wrote: > new backscatter (new languages, new wordings) which is something which can > hardled without redesigning email and people, thats why I think we will go I ment: ...which is something which cannot be handled... signature.asc Description: This is a d

Re: Bug#514039: backscatter on the debian-edu list, again

2009-03-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Don, On Sonntag, 1. März 2009, Don Armstrong wrote: > I've already droped in rules to deal with this; the previous ones > hadn't taken effect due to a warning that I didn't catch. Thanks. > It doesn't really matter to me what you folks decide, but since you > decided as a group not to do mode

Re: Bug#514039: backscatter on the debian-edu list, again

2009-03-01 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 01 Mar 2009, Holger Levsen wrote: > They seem not really to be willing to give us moderation as > requested in #514039 so I'll have to waste my time reporting > backscatter, which is what they want. (I dont get why they dont > listen to their users but instead ask them to suffer backscatter

backscatter on the debian-edu list, again

2009-03-01 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, I've discussed today on IRC with the debian listmasters (actually one) about the recent increase in volume of backscatter on the debian-edu list. They seem not really to be willing to give us moderation as requested in #514039 so I'll have to waste my time reporting backscatter, which is wh