Re: procinfo maintainership

2008-07-27 Thread tabris
tabris wrote: it appears that neocalderon.net is now a squatter domain. Meanwhile, I'm unsure who to contact regarding a replacement for procinfo that I started last year, procinfo-ng. http://freshmeat.net/projects/procinfo-ng/ Basically the goals included a) fixing all the 32bit/

Re: procinfo maintainership

2008-07-28 Thread tabris
Bernd Zeimetz wrote: So who do I need to contact to find a debian package maintainer for a) procinfo-18 b) procinfo-ng ? did you try to contact the maintainer of procinfo? If they're not interested, look at http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ Yes, I tried to contact the maintainer. t

Re: procinfo maintainership

2008-07-28 Thread tabris
Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Thanks for the info. As I wasn't able to find any other email adress or > activity from the maintainer, I've orphaned the package and it will be > listed within the orphaned packages on http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ > soon. So you could either adopt it and take care of it

Re: Bug#492807: ITP: procinfo-ng -- displays system information from /proc

2008-07-29 Thread tabris
Bastian Blank wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:18:02AM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: Procinfo-NG is a small program that gathers some system information from diverse files under /proc and prints it to the screen. /proc is deprecated for system information. /sys does not have

Bug#477072: mysql-server-5.0: Arbitrary data input plus GIS functions, causes mysql server crash

2008-08-18 Thread tabris
This bug has been sitting around since July w/o a resolution. I tracked it down to a difference between i386 builds and AMD64. The crash only occurs on AMD64. I think this is an important bug to be fixed as it results in a minor reproducible DoS/data-loss (of temporary tables and heap tabl

Re: Bug#477072: mysql-server-5.0: Arbitrary data input plus GIS functions, causes mysql server crash

2008-08-23 Thread tabris
Norbert Tretkowski wrote: Am Montag, den 18.08.2008, 09:22 -0700 schrieb tabris: This bug has been sitting around since July w/o a resolution. I tracked it down to a difference between i386 builds and AMD64. The crash only occurs on AMD64. I think this is an important bug to be fixed

Re: Bug#572986: Acknowledgement (radvd will not accept an interface name with a capital letter, like ethLAN or ethEXT)

2010-03-14 Thread tabris
This bug has been open a week w/o any updates, and squeeze release is looming. Any thoughts? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#572986: Acknowledgement (radvd will not accept an interface name with a capital letter, like ethLAN or ethEXT)

2010-03-14 Thread tabris
On 03/14/2010 01:58 PM, tabris wrote: > This bug has been open a week w/o any updates, and squeeze release is > looming. > > Any thoughts? > I just tested patching scanner.l and it does fix my issue I'm using the following note the last line, 'string' which allow

Re: Bug#572986: Acknowledgement (radvd will not accept an interface name with a capital letter, like ethLAN or ethEXT)

2010-03-15 Thread tabris
On 03/15/2010 12:32 AM, Ghe Rivero wrote: > I'll take a look to it this morning. Anyway, there is a new upstream > on the way , so maybe it will take a litle more of time to fix and mix > everything together. > > Ghe Rivero > If you can get me a backport of 1.5 to lenny I'll test it on my system