I've just started my love history again with squeeze.
There are 38 unquoted $i in /etc in i386 installing base+laptop+standar
There are 172 "$i" (maching without spaces around) 38 of them matches
whit spaces around (unquoted).
Some are iteration numbers, some are directory, files, etc...
I've n
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:30:07AM +0400, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:22:08AM +0200, posion bit wrote:
>> > There are 38 unquoted $i in /etc in i386 installing base+laptop+standar
>>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Giacomo A. Catenazzi, le Fri 27 Aug 2010 10:21:06 +0200, a écrit :
>> On 27.08.2010 10:09, posion bit wrote:
>> >look one so simple in /etc/init.d/rc
>> >
>> >
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Given that he hasn't bothered to present a single definitively broken script
> in /etc but instead seems to think that his prowess with grep entitles him
> to leave this most basic proof as an exercise for the reader, I'm pretty
> sure the
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 27 août 2010 à 11:57 +0200, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
>> > >Not if I have a "/etc/rc2.d/K03my damn daemon"
>> >
>> > Which is again the debian rules and the LSB rules about
>> > naming the init.d scripts.
>>
>> Debian rules an
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 27, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
>> Not if I have a "/etc/rc2.d/K03my damn daemon"
> True, but then you deserve all the pain you will receive.
Hi again, Marco and all.
I would love to invite to community to take a read to common
document
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Fr, 27 Aug 2010, posion bit wrote:
>> http://mywiki.wooledge.org/BashPitfalls
>
> Thanks, nice reading.
>
> Best wishes
I haven't write a line of that enlightened wiki :-)
Just sharing information sourc
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting posion bit (poison...@gmail.com):
>
>> I'm not going to fill a lot of little bugs for this, I expect debian
>> scripts to be designed following some simple bash best practices.
>
> By what miracle
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Could you please either start reporting (wishlist) bugs asking to make
> these scripts more robust against strange administrative practices or get
> tired of all this a little bit faster? A large thread in debian-devel
> with no concrete acti
9 matches
Mail list logo
