the number of bits isn't correctly set at
768 bits when you choose 2 (and maybe 1 and 3, haven't tested that).
niels
rts: a Compaq Deskpro has only COM1,
my computer has COM1 and COM2, other computers have internal modems on
COM[34].
Niels
--
Planet Internet Holding XXTP Support Engineer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I do not spe
no default gateway, don't attempt to add a route to it.
Niels
--
Planet Internet Holding XXTP Support Engineer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I do not speak for my employer - they are perfectly able to do that.
have -fPIE/-pie enabled by default.
"""
Niels, on behalf of the release team
[0] Enabling -fPIE/-fpie by default would harden debian systems against certain
attacks. See https://lintian.debian.org/tags/hardening-no-pie.html for
more det
butions to Debian will be even more impactful when he can sponsor the
packages he feels are ready.
https://nm.debian.org/process/1305/
[...]
Thanks for supporting Phil. :)
Best regards,
Niels
r putting it into
the build helper. I think this boils down to the use-case would be
invoked in practice where exactly the logic goes. But I feel it is again
a problem that is very solvable once we have the infrastructure in-place
and a proper idea of how to play out the use-case.
Dear, sbuild/pbuilder maintainers, feel free to give me a holler on this
and lets fix this with a prototype somewhere.
Best regards,
Niels
Simon McVittie:
On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 at 18:17:52 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
Simon McVittie:
In the design that I prototyped, it's declarative, loosely inspired by
the equivalent Gitlab-CI feature:
- the maintainer can write patterns into debian/build-artifacts for
package-specific q
am happy to work on the client side of this problem. I already took a
stab at something similar (see [1], currently stuck on getting a single
source of truth data source), so it would fit into the work I am doing
anyway.
Best regards,
Niels
[0]: I mean a dedicated `JSON` or `YAML` file in
discussion, so we are clear on it
and also who is the authoritative source for future changes.
In my book, debian-devel consensus gathering is slow and can be quite
draining, so we should not use it for "day-to-day" operational matters.
To me, that implies having a team with authori
migration to fully compliant
SPDX names.
Best regards,
Niels
On Thursday 09 March 2006 11:32, Martin Schulze wrote:
> I'm sorry to announce this but you'll have to find a new person who works
> on updating Debian stable and who is willing to cope with black holes and
> ftpmasters.
> James Troup as ftpmaster rejected my recent request to become an..
Then
On Monday 28 August 2006 20:35, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Hello, world!
>
> As a project, Debian is heavily committed to the ideals of free software.
> That's not news to anyone reading this, I'm sure, as it's something
> we've constantly worked to improve, whether that be by establishing our
> Social
have not been able to see this script. David
did not say anything about why the script was not still active when he
replied.
~Niels
PS: I had more luck contacting David using da...@axiombox.com rather
than the debian mail.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier
* Package name: eclipse-rse
Version : 3.1
Upstream Author : DSDP TM Development Team
* URL : http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm/
* License : Eclipse Public License Version 1.0 ("EPL")
Programming
sted patch
> may solve the problem.
>
> If others are interested to follow the same approach, I propose to use the
> following
> wiki page to draft a common reference: http://wiki.debian.org/TeamUpload.
>
> Have a nice sunday,
>
>
Thank you, I am having a nice Sunday;
kage has no human uploaders and a list as
maintainer (the exception being the QA list) [1], so I believe this has
already been taken care of.
~Niels
[1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/no-human-maintainers.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
could derive a source package of
existing format. That would probably also increase the adoption rate,
since existing tools would work with those formats.
~Niels
I reserve the right to change my opinion on this if the implementation
of the VCS-based source format is awesome enough.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
an prefetch it from [1]; I certainly
could use some feedback on it.
I will also be looking into providing a way to easily review a single
3.0 package (which would be #575394); suggestions are also welcome for that.
~Niels
[1] Script:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian/qdebdiff
Doc:
http://www.student.dtu.dk/~s072425/debian/qdebdiff.html
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
es default-jdk-builddep will pull *two* full Java
Development Environments.
There is a reason for "insanity"; if you are interested then get in contact
with
the Java Team.
Thank you in advance,
~Niels
NB: I am subscribed to debian-de...@l.d.o, but not debian-pol...@l.d.o; please
CC
kg-buildpackage as well? I think that
should do it (unless the build/clean does weird things).
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
the person testing the issue has not
already done it, could you convince him/her to file a bug against the
plugin?
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier
Owner: Niels Thykier
* Package name: eclipse-mylyn
Version : 3.2.1
* URL : http://www.eclipse.org/mylyn
* License : EPL v1.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Task support for Eclipse
Mylyn
l file and add the correct
build dependencies there.
I apologize for the short answer with no reference to relevant
information, but I am really out of time :)
I am about to leave DebConf10 (like a lot of other Debian people).
~Niels
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GN
x27;s different about debuild spawning xvfb-run versus spawning
> it myself?
>
Hi
Perhaps you could convince your upstream of using a non-eclipse build
system with eclipse plugin support (e.g. autotools using the integration
plugin provided by the LinuxTools project[1]).
~Niels
[1] http://
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: eclipse-jgit
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Eclipse Development Team
* URL : http://eclipse.org/jgit/
* License : BSD-like
Programming
library docs each time the compiler is updated? What does it
> give?
Hey,
It is possible the Java packages could use binNMU for arch: all packages
as well. There was some talk about injecting "ABI" versioning in Java
Libraries at DebConf10, so we could handle ABI breakage in a similar
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Niels Thykier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: lpg-generator-java
Version : 2.0.20
Upstream Author : Philippe Charles
* URL : http://lpg.sourceforge.net/
* License : EPL-1.0
Programming
nd that these really
> are upstream packages.
>
While I have not used it myself, it seems dpkg-source can (partly) help
you here by using the "extend-diff-ignore" option in
debian/source/options.[1]
~Niels
[1]
http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/01/28/3-ways-to-not-clutter-your-debi
Mike,
Thank you for your efforts.
If you plan on doing this transition for Jessie, please do keep the "5th
of September" deadline in mind[1]. Please also consider filing a
transition bug to help us (the release team) get an overview of the
affected packages at your earliest convenience
up that close to the freeze is that
last thing we (i.e. the release team) wants at that point.
~Niels
PS: To clarify to all: The freeze will occur in testing, but (unblocked)
updates will come from sid. So if sid is broken, it can adversely your
ability to get fixes into testing. See the f
s essential, so you would have the same issue in
stable (just with a different init system).
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/543bbae1.6030...@thykier.net
r
> reintroducing the compat symlink for that one alone if the release-team
> (CCed) sees fit to that. :/
>
> [...]
>
> Thanks,
> Guillem
>
>
Hi Guillem,
Could you please re-instate all the compat symlinks for Jessie? Besides
the package listed, we are als
> Regards,
>
> Osamu
>
>
The release name of Jessie+1 will be announced tomorrow morning
(09:15-10:15 UTC) at the Release update at the Cambridge mini-DebConf.
~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
l/apt.html
> [...]
>
> Any idea how to fix this / work around this???
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
For transitions, wait till the relevant packages have been rebuilt. In
other cases, the package may be broken or an uncoordinated transition
may have started. In the latter case, please c
the respective
*@packages.qa.debian.org emails.
Thanks,
Niels (on behalf of the Release Team)
[1] The tools are available from:
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/rc-buggy-leaf-packages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
;
>
Hi,
Lintian is outdated (#664600) and the fix has been commited to the git
repository[1]
~Niels
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=ec4e5cbf5ceea35db5948be21d3b03d696607b0f
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debi
On 2012-05-14 22:01, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:51:43PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>
>> Lintian is outdated (#664600) and the fix has been commited to the git
>> repository[1]
>
> I saw a bug report requesting that packages that failed the l
em if
they are there. One run with non-free+contrib and one without - the
"newly" uninstallable between the two runs should be set you are looking
for. It does not catch issues like "foo-nonfree | foo", but they would
be caught by your other query.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
or Squeeze: Can I filter the bugs to
> find only those corresponding to Wheezy?
>
> [...]
Hi,
http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ has a "Only bugs relevant to
testing" link, which may be what you are looking for.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@li
; And ports should be checked, too.
>
> Andreas
>
> [...]
>
>
I am doing a lintian run for amd64 + i386 on stable for starters
(limited to md5sum-mismatch). I think that (plus the normal sid runs)
should cover most issues.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
On 2012-09-20 21:03, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-09-20 18:52, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> On 2012-09-18 09:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> Just to give a short impression what we can find here:
>>
>>> guile-1.6-dev_1.6.8-10.1
>>> /usr/lib/libguile-ltd
deadline for these[2], but if time permits I may
follow up with deadline and a filtered list.
Fun fact: According to UDD[3], 79 RC bugs is a bit over 10% of all RC
bugs affecting Jessie.
Thanks,
~Niels
[1] We normally filter out certain type of RC bugs (incl. but not
limited to license issues), where we
for your explanation.
>
> Best regards, 2013-6-10(Mon)
>
The "wiki" would probably be [1].
As for lintian.d.o being 404 atm. We had a technical (software-only)
problem. The site should be back to normal in a couple of days once
lintian has had time to process
se positive for this being a shared library.
I have a feeling the particular case is just a left-over (i.e. now
unused) symlink rather than something that effects the functionality of
the package.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
w-popcon-lt-500.txt") are not dealt with before the 8th of
July, the packages will be removed from testing. Note that "dealt
with" may also include downgrading a severity-inflated bug or fixing
affected versions in the BTS.
For reference, the original list is also included.
Thanks,
N
On 2013-07-01 09:05, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:32 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> #678383 [pixelmed]: pixelmed: FTBFS with Java7 (uses internal Java API)
>
> Would it be possible to filter out (in the future?) any bugs that are
> marked as pending ? I
On 2013-07-01 08:21, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for this work.
>
> On 30/06/13 at 23:32 +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
>> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The pack
despite the bug being
fixed/downgraded etc. (or if you are fixing it now), please reply to
this mail or ping me over IRC (#d-release) within the next 10 hours.
~Niels
"Adam C. Powell, IV"
elmerfem (U)
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
ht
Alexandre Quessy
toonloop (U)
Andreas Tille
On 2013-07-08 01:34, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 01:10:51AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>
>> Andreas Tille
>>camitk (U)
>
> A fixed version is since two days in
>http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
>
>
>
ecessary to display languages that we support at the installation.
>
> Have a nice Debconf !
>
~Niels
[1] http://lintian.debian.org/tags/file-name-is-not-valid-UTF-8.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/520895a6.1090...@thykier.net
uilt)' format package whose maintainer
> wouldn't mind a bunch of crazy (perhaps abortive) NMUs to
> experimental, which I can therefore use for testing ? I promise not
> to upload to sid by mistake.
>
> Volunteers welcome :-).
>
> Ian.
>
>
If you promise to a
r the following architectures and I intend
to continue this for the lifetime of the jessie release:
For , I
- test (most|all) packages on this architecture
- fix toolchain issues
- triage arch-specific bugs
- fix arch-related bugs
- maintain buildds
- ...
""&
of dinstalls (although, I don't have particularly
strong opinions in regards 2 vs 4 dinstalls per day).
For those interested, I believe #703366 might be worth a read on that
topic[1].
>>From this very limited POV the proposal appears to be an improvement.
>
> Helmut
>
running the tests at build time.
>
> Cheers
>
Hey,
Personally, I just added a small sh script to set a few ENV variables
then called the upstream test target (see [1]).
~Niels
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=blob;f=debian/
On 2013-09-01 09:33, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As we announced in [LAST-BITS], we would like to get a better idea of
> that status of the ports, to make an informed decision about which
> port can be released with jessie. One of the steps is to get an
> overview of which
intian data file
called "data/fields/obsolete-packages". (Though, that is not a remark
about whether the renaming should be done in this case)
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5242b354.5000...@thykier.net
On 2013-09-03 13:49, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 05:09:22PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> How you can help (NEW-TEST-HELP)
>>
>>
>> Add tests to your packages. The full specification for these
>> tests
On 2013-09-30 17:33, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Niels Thykier wrote:
>>> [KEY-PACKAGES]
>>> http://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
>>
>> If you're curious, as I was, how this list is
is there's a new warning for
> configure.in being deprecated. So for a well maintained package or a
> good upstream this isn't going to be a problem.
>
>> [...]
>
For the record, Lintian should have a check for this[1]. From what we
can detect (assuming no false-posit
his
email *promptly* (CC'ing me explicitly is fine) with your concerns or
corrections.
At this time, I have *not* updated the arch qualification table yet. I
will do that in a couple of days. We will also follow up on this in the
next bits from the release team.
~Niels
[AP] http://release.
imes be as
simple as correcting the metadata of the bugs (see also #725321[0]) or
(where inflated) downgrade the severity of the bug.
This mail was a "one-time public service annoucement"; I *do not*
intend to send out "reminders" in the future. Remember that you can
pull th
On 2013-10-06 13:09, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06/10/13 08:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>kfreebsd-8: bugs 720470,717959,720476, flagged for removal in 14.7 days
>
> Not sure why that's appearing in this list because:
> 1. the package was removed from te
idea I cannot volunteer to
do it. I already have a sufficient "d-release" backlog ... :-/ Even
the current implementation was "out-sourced".
On a related note, kudos to Ivo De Decker for being the "Do'er" behind
automatic removals!
~Niels
--
To UNSUB
On 2013-10-13 19:24, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
Hi,
> First of all, thanks a lot for planning this well in advance. Much
> appreciated. This changes a lot compared to what happened in NYC! :)
>
You are welcome, :)
> On 10/13/2013 11:01 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
t would no longer be
applicable for a "carte blanche" unblock.
The note referenced above is about embedding all the upstream changes
in a "Debian patch" and only bumping the Debian revision (while keeping
the "upstream version" unchanged). Basically, it i
On 2013-10-13 17:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Freeze date and Freeze Policy for Jessie
>
>
> We are happy to announce that we will freeze Jessie at 23:59 UTC on
> the 5th of November 2014.
>
> To avoid any confusion around exactl
On 2013-10-15 15:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> [sorry for the late reply I was on vac]
>
Hi,
No worries.
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 09:52:17AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>
>> Andreas Tille
>>gdpc: bugs 713652, flagged for removal in 8
On 2013-10-19 16:38, Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> [snip freeze policy]
>
Hi,
I s/-arm/-ports/'ed the CC, since I figured the rest of the porters
would find the answer equally interesting.
&g
On 2013-10-29 16:05, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes ("Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)"):
>> Results of porter roll-call
>> ===
> ...
>> Summary table:
>> Arch
In
the top of the bug should also see the "Blocking fix for" (or "Fix
blocked by" if you access #727532) that links to the other bug (as long
as it is open).
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On 2013-10-29 17:48, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes ("Re: Bits from the Release Team (Jessie freeze info)"):
>> [...]
>> As mentioned we are debating whether the "5 DDs" requirement still makes
>> sense. Would you say that we should abolish the
On 2013-11-03 15:49, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Niels Thykier dixit:
>
>> [...]
>> Until we have a clear definition of "actively maintained ports", I would
>> recommend porters to err on the side of being verbose over being silent.
>
> I’ve held off on the
On 2013-11-03 16:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2013-11-03 15:49, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> > Niels Thykier dixit:
>> >
>>> >> [...]
>>> >> Until we have a clear definition of "actively maintained ports", I would
>>> >
On 2013-11-03 16:03, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 03/11/13 10:54, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Come to think of it; maybe we should have a BTS page for each of the
>> ports (e.g. a pseudo package in the BTS).
>
> We've had this on kfreebsd, due it to having been
On 2013-11-03 23:04, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 11:54:34AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [...]
>
>> I suppose a "sponsor-only" DD could be sufficient, provided that the
>> sponsor knows the porters well enough to be willing to sign off on
org/viewvc/secure-testing/hardening/subgoal-important.txt?view=log
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/secure-testing/hardening/subgoal-dsa.txt?view=log
>
Hi,
I am pleased to say this release goal has been approved for Wheezy.
Please remember to use the right usertag[1].
~Niels
[1] http://lists.debi
; the 3.0.0-2-686-pae kernel.
> I know it's experimental, but is there a workaround ?
>
> Thanks a lot for your help.
>
> Kind regards,
> Sébastien
>
>
Hi,
Have you enabled non-free? There is a "firmware-bnx2x" in non-free,
which is probably what you are
days, if no one picks it up.
~Niels
[1]
Package: lprfax
Version: 0.6-28
Installed-Size: 204
Maintainer: Camm Maguire
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.0), netpbm, magicfilter, ghostscript, transfig,
libjpeg-progs, texlive-latex-base, poppler-utils
Pre-Depends: lprng (>= 3.6.12), debia
ign up as an volunteer.
- There are up 126 QA uploads waiting to be done. :)
- There will probably also be some NMUs.
* If filing bugs for this, please use:
* User: debian...@lists.debian.org
* Usertags: build-arch-target
The release goal wiki page is at [4] and the current advocates a
On 2011-11-05 21:22, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for
> the optional debian/rules targets "build-arch" and "build-indep".
> The intention is to finally solve issues like #61928
reassign 555034 wnpp
retitle 555034 O: mlview - xml editor for GNOME environment
thanks
Hi,
I am hereby orphaning mlview[1] on behalf of Sebastian Bacher. As it is
RC buggy and has a very low popcon, I intend to RM within 14 days unless
someone picks it up.
~Niels
[1]
Package: mlview
On 2011-11-16 11:14, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Niels Thykier writes:
>
>> On 2011-11-05 21:22, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to propose the goal of getting archive-wide support for
>>> the optional debian/rules
y and has extremely low
popcon.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ee13d6b.5040...@thykier.net
"""
If you are interested in adopting this package, please be prepared to
fix its outstanding RC bugs.
If no one picks this package up within 14 days or so, I will push for
its removal on the grounds it that it is RC-buggy.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@list
packages are not dealt with
before the 11th of Feb., the packages will be removed from testing.
Note that "dealt with" may also include downgrading a
severity-inflated bug or fixing affected versions in the BTS.
Thanks,
Niels (on behalf of the Release Team)
[0] http://release.debian.org
On 2012-01-26 02:45, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 01:24 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>>
>>> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
>>> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against the
[...]
I suspect devref 6.5.2.5 is a (possible) source of this impression. As
I recall, there are also some Lintian checks about using first person.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
intian accepting arch-qualified override files,
but I do not see the "strict" (i.e. "must") requirement[1]. Lintian
already allows you to do arch-specific overrides and 2.5.5 will even
allow architecture wildcards as well[2].
~Niels
[1] Exception being compressed override files, but o
intian's parser ignores empty lines before/between paragraphs.
~Niels
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/506c09da.7020...@thykier.net
e 0.4.0 (April 6th, same year). However,
neither change have a bug associated with the changes[1] and I not aware
of any copy of either of those versions still existing.
While I cannot say for certain, I am guessing it is side effect and not
intentional[2].
~Niels
[1]
0.3.0 entry:
* Internal c
It is also easier for us if we can avoid having to
reintroduce a removed package.
We will check the DELAYED queues before activing the removal hints, so
NMUs in the DELAYED queues will be given a chance to reach unstable.
Thanks,
Niels (on behalf of the Release Team)
The bugs were found using the
On 2012-10-19 17:43, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:32:39AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
>> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
>> found in the attached dd
On 2012-10-18 10:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> If the relevant RC bugs in the affected packages are not dealt with
> /before/ Friday the 26th of Oct., the packages will be removed from
> testing. Note that "dealt with" may also include downgr
stable.
Thanks,
Niels (on behalf of the Release Team)
The bugs were found using the tools from:
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/rc-buggy-leaf-packages
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
[1] We intend to do the removal with the 10:00 UTC run of Britney of
that day.
--8
On 2012-10-28 18:47, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:37:38PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> ax25-apps, fabric, firmware-crystalhd, icewm-themes, ilisp, inguma,
>> lustre, mingw-ocaml, noflushd, openvas-plugins-dfsg, php-crypt-gpg,
>> phpgacl, python-
On 2012-10-30 14:32, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> If the relevant RC bugs in the affected packages are not dealt with
> /before/ Wednesday the 7th of Nov.[1], the packages will be removed
> from testing. Note that "dealt with" may also include downgradi
stable.
Thanks,
Niels (on behalf of the Release Team)
The bugs were found using the tools from:
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/rc-buggy-leaf-packages
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
[1] We intend to do the removal with the 10:00 UTC run of Britney of
that day.
--8
On 2012-11-15 00:15, Emmanuel Bouthenot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:02:10PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Should you need a bit more time than given, please do not hesitate to
>> contact us. It is also easier for us if we can avoid having
On 2012-11-14 22:02, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. [...]
>
ferm, apt-2p2 and mediawiki-math has been fixed in sid and by the looks
of it all of them are al
stable.
Thanks,
Niels (on behalf of the Release Team)
The bugs were found using the tools from:
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/collab-qa/rc-buggy-leaf-packages
http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html
[1] We intend to do the removal with the 10:00 UTC run of Britney of
that day.
--8
1 - 100 of 390 matches
Mail list logo
