way dselect's interacts with the user;
- /usr/lib/dpkg/methods/disk/setup is a shell script with snippets of perl
code incuded. IMHO it is not a bad idea to write the whole script in
perl, considering that it assumes perl to be present anyway.
Cheers,
Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any takers? I'd love to work with some people on a little project to have
this working for 2.1.
Cheers,
Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that might be usefull to repair a broken system
> (fs utils, ftape utils, smb client, amanda, whatever you think is good).
I'm really interested in this, plus I have a cdwriter. Count me in on
this one!
Cheers,
Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Hi,
I've (finally) packaged Xbat. The licence is GPL. Here's some info
pasted from the debian/control file.
Package: xbat
Architecture: any
Section: games
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Joost Kooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: A classic shoot-em-up game for X11.
Xbat c
In both KDE (e.g. Konqueror, Kmail) and GNOME (e.g. gedit) applications
Cyrillic letters are displayed as double-width.
Ah, that was a long time ago that I had that problem. (But for me
mozilla used to have the problem too, not any more though)
I just tried again with gedit, and I cannot reproduce
the kernel.
> (where can i find the reasons, why kernel headers are in libc ? i know
> that nearly anybody sais, that this is the right way, but sometimes i
> get frustrated and start to disbelief).
/usr/doc/lib5/FAQ.gz -- where else?
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/bin/perl -sp
f a modifying the package isn't allowed, then it cannot go
into the main archive, and has to go into non-free, even if you're
allowed to make money distributing it.
Non-free it is
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
T
> Xaw95 but not the standard widget set).
One possible solution is to link Xaw statically in the freeciv binary.
That's what I do with aXe.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the w
2.0.3-4 The GNU C library version 2 (run-time files)
ii libc6-dbg 2.0.3-4 The GNU C library version 2 (debugging/profi
ii libc6-dev 2.0.3-4 The GNU C library version 2 (development fil
ii libc6-doc 2.0.3-4 The GNU C library version 2 (documentation f
In short, thanks for the clarification
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (joost witteveen) writes:
>
> > One possible solution is to link Xaw statically in the freeciv binary.
> > That's what I do with aXe.
>
> Or you can just use -rpath when you compile to force it to use a
> particular dynamically linked libXa*
significant for people running Bo
> >as webservers, as they will probably not have gs installed eighter.
> >Or if they have serious reasons not to install svgalib, why do they
> >install xlib?
>
> Because they want to run remote X Sessions.
So it will at least not just b
promised) two weeks
of testing.
XFree 3.3 has important security fixes, and there seems to be no other
way to close the security holes currently in debian 1.3.0 than to include
Xfree 3.3, so there is a chance that will be included. I'm much less
sure about XEmacs 19.15 though, although
illing to do so.
My machine is connected to the internet via a 6kbyte/s link, so up/down
loading your (large) packages will not be very fast, but at least
it works.
Mail me if you want an account on my "unstable" machine.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777iht
ugs in them, that can then be reported, thus
forcing the maintainer to do something about it. But I don't think there
will be many of those packages.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail th
v | /usr/{lib,include}
> libc5 | libfoo-g-altdev | /usr/i486-linuxlibc1/{lib,include}
Here again, unless I'm really confused, the "g" is mixed up.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE
What has self-contained to do with Motif?
Anyway, Lars just posted a script to auto-build the whole distribution,
and I really think with such scripts (presumably improved ones, but
the one from Lars apparently already works) we will get a self-contained
distribution rather soon.
> They cou
> On Jun 12, joost witteveen wrote
> >
> > Well, OK, I can see *somebody* wants this.
> > But still I'm not convinced this warrants inclusion in stable.
> > Are there other people that would like the dependancy change
> >
> > - Depends: svgalib1 (
e
know what to do with it at the time, and I thought "don't fix
what ain't broken", but I've changed libg++272's priority now
to "Important"
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE F
27;ll send you your account info pgp-encrypted, so you will need
pgp on your system.
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ething to experimental today. I wouldn't encourage anybody to
> > register their documents with dwww just yet, since it's all going
> > to change. Hopefully, I'll get past the prototype stage in the
> > next month or so, and there will be a standard supported way
versions that fail to install.
And even then, why not install lib5-altdev? Then there is no problem
whatsoever.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMA
should I just go ahead (well, I'll give
Larry a few more days, but then I'll just upload it).
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMA
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Thu, 19 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > I would very much like to have a libc6 version of that package
> > available (no, I don't use svgalib myself, but some of my packages
> > do, and I want to fix bugs in them).
> &
more work, as they
now have to decide what version of checker to install
(quite a hard choice for a newbie, I'd say).
- give the developper extra work
- give the mirrors more work, make debian even larger
(If you want to do this, why not simply say "strip /usr/lib/*"?
2, why not libg++27g, that's what
the standard tells us to use. I only chose libg++272 because
HJ Lu did that, and it doesn't seem to cause problems).
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
s better to have things look bad in the
past and good in the future, but the point is: we cannot change the
past. And the simple fackt is, that the past (also called "bo" or "hamm")
used libfoo-dev for the names. So, there's no way we can change bo/hamm
any more.
d
only 1 in for of those turn-of-century years are leap years. Maybe that
will change again. And about the seconds: we (currently, prossibly always)
simply cannot calulate the length of a day accurately enough to know
well in advance when to insert them. But I'd say the two animals are
at l
zy to
> go through all failing packages, here's a list of some of them,
> with the reason for the failure listed. Some packages failed
> because I didn't have the time to install the stuff they needed.
This list is "only" 40 packages. We've got about 10 times m
So what's the
problem? Just make your g77 package generate the gcc packages too,
and you could sometimes even have _less_ bytes move through your
modem!
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING
ow hard
> would it be to implement versioned Provides: in dpkg? Or are there
> other reasons not to implement it? Is solution 2) too kludgy?
I strongly prefer method 1. I really think dpkg should be improved,
but as that doesn't seem to happen any time soon, I don't think
method 2 wi
ource version is joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
dpkg-buildpackage: build architecture is i386
sudo debian/rules clean
make clean
make[1]: Entering directory
`/mnt/bigfoot/shome/joost/maintain/libg++/libg++272-2.7.2.5'
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `clean'. Stop.
make[
g to do with C/C++.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
eam source, somebody
once reported that there was a security bug in 1.2.10, but the guy never
actually bothered to say what the bug was[1], so I'm not very inclined
to trust him).
[1] other than something as vague as "fails to surrender priveleges".
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PRO
dy conflicts with libc5-dev. And all old (bo) libcfoo-dev packages
should depend on libc5-dev anyway.
> [2] The location ../libc5-compat was introduced in the ldso package. As
> ldso is a package on all linus distributions we'll keep it for
s/linus/linux/
--
joost witteveen,
antly different from what was in the original
> archive. If 'patch' isn't smart enough to create a directory that
> didn't exist originally, what can I do about it?
Patch is smart enough, it's just that dpkg isn't smart enough to
tell patch to be smart enough
**4 combinations = 2**128 = number of different md5sum's
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
or svgalib-1.2.11, but cannot find
it anywhere (yes they say "will address"). Is there anybody here who
knows where to find this?
I used to think them dec people were competent, but with a security
allert that doesn't even attempt to explain where the hole is, and
no possibility
> On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > > So, what method do you prefer? Or do you have better ideas? How hard
> > > would it be to implement versioned Provides: in dpkg? Or are there
> > > other reasons not to implement it? Is solution 2) too kludgy?
in South Africa?
If my server is gonna be a "build server", I'd *very* much prefer
a modified dpkg-dev that allows for non-root package builds.
(in fakt so much, that I may be tempted to write it myself. You
don't need that many changes).
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTE
Other package management utilities can take advantage of this field
> too...
But at the moment the file modification date on most mirrors reflects
the "Entered-Date" quite accurately.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO
> On Mon, 23 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > (in fakt so much, that I may be tempted to write it myself. You
> > don't need that many changes).
>
> Well, you need to write your own version of make that looks for any attempt
> to run chmod, chown etc, and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (joost witteveen) writes:
>
> > > 5. Conflicts & Dependencies for hamm packages
> > >
> > [..]
> > >
> > >The hamm libfoo package has to depend on libc6 and has to conflict
> > >with libfoo-dev and
(as above), and in the FAKEROOT_FILE you'd just record the "fake contents"
of /etc/passwd... Well, never mind.
The only problem with this is that if there are setuid binaries involved
in the debian/rules binary process, they will not use the LD_PRELOAD
stuff, and things may go wrong
7;t have it eighter.
(I need a libc6 dpkg for fakeroot).
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
e there's nothing to stop me from making a
working fakeroot package, but it's not this release isn't yet.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
g 755, I say we revert them to 644.
>
The only reason I remember is that the shared libraries are
"executed", only not from the commandline, but within other binaries.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIB
chown mail:sys file2
> > rm file2
> > ls -al file2
> >
> > I doubt whether these are important, and even if they are, I
> > guess it will be possible to get it right.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777
/usr/bin/xxx
Now if the chmod call in the middle _only_ writes the "fake permissiosn"
to the $FAKEROOT file, the third command will not work. However,
I planned to make the wrapper chmod function attempt to work
as expected (as long as it can, above it can), in addition to logging
the per
rough that LD_PRELOAD lib.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777ihttp://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
>
> > > Build a shared library which wraps all calls to chown(), then set
> > > LD_PRELOAD to that library. Should be pretty foolproof.
> > Yeah, I like that: wrap
> On Jun 25, joost witteveen wrote
> > The only problem with this is that if there are setuid binaries involved
> > in the debian/rules binary process, they will not use the LD_PRELOAD
> > stuff, and things may go wrong. (But as long as those binaries are
> > setuid r
so that doesn't work. I've
been testing it with "es" (yet another shell that I never heard
of, but I'm the maintainer).
[2] Well, I've olverloaded lstat all right, but it doesn't seem to
get called don't know why yet. Why would chown() work a
is about politics". The point is, the whole discussion wasn't about
politics, it was about POSIX time, and that _is_ relevant.
In short:
- The discussion is in _NO_ way related to politics (not international
politics anyway, maybe computational politics).
- don't extract _one_ line
all processes not in own session
unmount /home
(I'm hoping execv doesn't inherit open filediscriptors. The man page
doesn't mention anything about this, the execve manpage sais that
execve does inherit stuff).
> Thanks in advance
Well, actuall I don't think this all works, but hey, it
> [ Please don't Cc: public replies to me. ]
>
> joost witteveen:
> > So, there's a first version of fakeroot sitting in
> >ftp://rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl/debian/upload
>
> I suggest a simpler solution, which doesn't require intricate
> hacking to w
> * xaw3d-dev-1.3(see "ftp://ftp.x.org/contrib/widgets/Xaw3d/";)
>
> Is there already anybody working on these packages and thus making my
> efforts unnecessary?
Yes, xaw3d-dev will come up in a week or to.
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#!/usr
Kai into saying this, by extracting _one_ line from his email,
and claim it "can be very insulting".
Yes, this is not the right place for this discussion, I agree with you
there. But the discussion about Israel was started by you, Kai didn't
stay anthing that could be eighter be s
ied by Makefile
dpkg-shlibdeps>
dpkg-shlibdeps> use POSIX;
dpkg-shlibdeps> use POSIX qw(:errno_h :signal_h);
Does anybody know what I did wrong?
The perl compile went really smoothly, but apparently something
went wrong?
Thanks (if anybody knows, anyway).
--
joost witteveen, [EMAIL PR
's. I wouldn't want netscape to appear in any such catogary.
> Calendar, xcalendar, I'm sure there are or soon will be others.
Yes, Calendar I agree: that belongs to something like "Personal".
joost witteveen,
(I'm preparing for my promotion 1998/1/7, and hav
hat you intend to happen in the
above case, but I'd rather it be reversed. Add to that that there is
already a (rather poorly documented -- I had to look for it
in the sources myself) "false" value for the strings (it's called "none", for
compatibilty reasons with the ve
and as I
> > may not be able to reproduce this, it could be useless to file a bug. I may
> > do it anyway.
>
> It happened on every install I saw today.
> (Have been to an installfest.)
This bug has been in dselect for ages. Nothing harmful though.
Cheers,
Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6
MV:UY&?.Z16U9,1:MU)#V3[4&0:/@.-O.<%E^'C-(?S[;-/DGEKEE+.E1PH3G
M'G0YPQEJMY0)1;HWP32%>92]OYZT&!4)\0#1_"5SJ?B5)&-Z>I67D^A5PMZ"
MD\=M(K'%E$J>8&B_PY:5*R7$K#,&[0?-RP->]4H60G;QNO<:S-L*QVACRETC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>I'3,77A3\]54<38F
his:
/var/lib/dpkg/info/deity.postrm: [: --: binary operator expected
Cheers,
Joost
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Joey,
At the moment it's really difficult for me to apply those patches to xaw*
Could I beg you (or anyone else) to do a NMU?
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 1) The document must be free but may require a change in the title for a
> modified version (for example "FSSTND" would become "Debians implementation
> of the FSSTND" or something without the acronym FSSTND at all).
>
> 2) Many authors don't want their work to be published out of their control
>
> A new mirror_2.9-1 is now on master. The copyright has changed (see below),
> and should be fine with us. Or is the 'changes must be distributed as
> patches' policy too restrictive for us?
>
> So here's the copyright:
>
>
>Copyright _ 1990 - 1998 Lee McLoughlin
>
>Permission to us
>
> Hello!
>
> On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 09:19:11PM +0200, joost witteveen wrote:
> >
> > > The document authors already can enforce a lot of things, keeping the
> > > document free:
> > >
> > [...]
> > > I want to hear valid reason
I'll find it).
> David M. Smith, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> x3952 http://www.maths.lancs.ac.uk:2080/~maa036/
BTW, if anyone else is working on the *TeX* packages, please tell me.
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen
aybe you
should create a tetex package?
Emilio writes:
> This is sure related to the bug with MakeTeXPK someone reported some days
> ago, when using the "times" package.
Dunno. I can use the "times" package. The Times package, as far
as I know _should_ work without
, so if there are no other people willing
to take it over, I'll be glad to dive into the TeX packages.
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 03 Jul 96 13:00 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: xaw3d
Version: 1.2a-5
Binary: xaw3d
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
xaw3d: Adds a cute 3d to X apps using the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 03 Jul 96 11:50 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: transfig
Version: 3.1.2a-2
Binary: transfig
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
transfig: Utilities for printing figure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 03 Jul 96 10:38 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: xfig
Version: 3.1.4b-4
Binary: xfig
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
xfig: Facility for Interactive Generation of f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 15 Jul 96 22:02 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: transfig
Version: 3.1.2a-3
Binary: transfig
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
transfig: Utilities for printing figure
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 16 Jul 96 21:17 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: axe
Version: 6.1.2-4
Binary: axe
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
axe: An editor for X.
Changes:
corrected inf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 22 Jul 96 12:02 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: xosview
Version: 1.3.2-6
Binary: xosview
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
xosview: Fun to watch CPU/network usage pro
weren't that bad after all, and I
only needed to change axinfo in one place.
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
sn't depend on libpaper, and has been reading
/etc/papersize before the existance of libpaper.)
I do wonder if libpaper does a better job, and I do wonder if
gs really should read "A4 ". Some people were really glad I
added a wrapper to allow gs to read /etc/papersize. Some are
angry
eaningfull name, no?) and the wrapper as 'gs'
> of course. Apparently people were confused by your gs-papersize being
> the gs that does not handle papersize despite its name.
So, that's not the case any more (the real gs is gs.real, the wrapper
is gs).
What is causing m
ror (he uploaded
a known buggy xosview even without mailing me in advance of doing so).
Thanks.
BTW Ian also sent mail to debian-devel saying that this bug was in
his uploaded version.
xosview-1.3.2-6 doesn't contain this bug.
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
nged to have "Optional: as default,
instead of the current "extra").
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
t I can do about this -- it's really
not just what paths it searches, it's also how it parses the
appdefauls files (all manually).
So if you've got any better ideas, I'd like to close this bug.
But thanks for the bug-report anyway, it's nice to know
people use xosview.
--
j
aybe it's worth the little
extra efford of mailing the patches to the maintainer/bug-system
and wait to see them included in the next release?
If you don't want to do that, could you send your patches to me,
so that try to handle it?
Thanks,
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
I am unsure I've done the right thing with the
patch, I don't want to upload the new pixmap to master.
I've put it on ftp://rulcmc.leidenuniv.nl/joost/pixmap_2.6pl1_4*
for you (and other interested parties) to try out, and
I've asked the pixmap mailinglist for more
y would we discriminate against czech?
Then again, I come from Europe to, and my first language isn't English
eighter.
Good luck with your packages!
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
the
standard Xt interface, but he didn't say when.
Xosview-1.4.1 AFAIK doesn't use it.
I'm closing this bug, as I cannot do anything about it, and
the upstream maintainer doesn't care.
Thanks anyway,
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
on maintaining a broken xosview?
Sometimes, I really don't know what to do.
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
#x27;s very nice, all you prospective xosview buggers: try procmeter!)
Although I guess the upstream maintainer would be interested
to correct this one, I think, togehter with the other ones, I'll
just try to move xosview to contrib.
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
n
(and for the bug-reports those of you who didn't read this are going
to send),
--
joost witteveen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Use Debian/GNU Linux!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 04 Aug 96 14:33 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: axe
Version: 6.1.2-5
Binary: axe
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
axe: An editor for X.
Changes:
* changed axinf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 15 Aug 96 11:53 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gsfonts
Version: 4.01-1
Binary: gsfonts
Architecture: all source
Description:
gsfonts: Fonts for the ghostscript inter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 15 Aug 96 15:44 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gs
Version: 4.01-2
Binary: gs
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
gs: Postscript interpreter with X11 and svgalib p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 15 Aug 96 21:21 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl1-3
Binary: pixmap
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
pixmap: A pixmap editor.
Changes:
- Fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 16 Aug 96 19:51 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl1-5
Binary: pixmap
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
pixmap: A pixmap editor.
Changes:
- Up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 20 Aug 96 17:28 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gsfonts
Version: 4.01-2
Binary: gsfonts
Architecture: all source
Description:
gsfonts: Fonts for the ghostscript inter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 21 Aug 96 17:00 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: screen
Version: 3.7.1-7
Binary: screen
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
screen: A screen manager with VT100/ANSI te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 21 Aug 96 17:23 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: pixmap
Version: 2.6pl2-1
Binary: pixmap
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
pixmap: A pixmap editor.
Changes:
* up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 24 Aug 96 07:47 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: screen
Version: 3.7.1-8
Binary: screen
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
screen: A screen manager with VT100/ANSI te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 28 Aug 96 18:39 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gs
Version: 3.33-1
Binary: gs
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
gs: Postscript interpreter with X11 and svgalib p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 28 Aug 96 21:19 UT
Format: 1.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: Low
Maintainer: joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gs
Version: 4.01-3
Binary: gs
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
gs: Postscript interpreter with X11 and svgalib p
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
