On 2025-03-05 08:52:22 +0900 (+0900), Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
I am surprised nobody has mentionned support (or lack of support) of
text/markdown at this point...
[...]
Surely you mean troff/groff?
.Pp
.Bd It's \fIthe best\fP!
;)
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
the vi vs emacs
skirmishes of yore.
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
system has the
capacity to install new firmware behind your back regardless of
whether or you're personally okay with it doing so.
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ngage with counsel
to get answers. Turn-around time is typically somewhere between a
week and a month depending on their availability, and whether the
specific questions necessitate a referral to other colleagues with
slightly different specializations.
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Descri
tmux session on a remote cloud VM), so this was
extremely helpful for me as well.
I'm composing and sending this with your suggestions applied, seems
to be working well so far. Thanks again!
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y "unwrapped" or "rewrapped" after concatenating
subsequent lines.
Absence of a space at the line end doesn't say not to wrap that
line, but merely not to combine it with the line that follows. The
line itself can still be wrapped as needed if it exceeds the
cl
s the contemporary age of packages in the prior LTS is
well over two years by then.
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
cribe to individual bugs is
tedious enough that I only do it occasionally for bugs I am interested
in, usually where I am not the bug submitter.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
ge and makes it harder to see full packaging history.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
packages.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
m governments or organized
crime^W^Wcorporate interests snooping it, but the distinction is
significant. PGP and TLS are not even remotely similar models
privacy-wise.
--
Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
s-adwaita/-/pipelines/843148
> Mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-adwaita/
> RFS: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1101879
The Debian Fonts team has claimed ownership of this RFS. Could you
reply to my proposal from Friday there?
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
team. Packaging will be at
https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/paper-clip
The upstream source is at https://github.com/Diego-Ivan/Paper-Clip
See https://circle.gnome.org/ for more information about GNOME Circle.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bícha
ether the GR would be effective immediately.
My suggestion is for you to ask the DPL to extend the discussion
period by a week (for constitutional reasons) followed by an immediate
withdrawal of the GR. Withdrawing the GR allows you to resubmit later
and wait 2-3 weeks from that point.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
/Fretboard/
See https://circle.gnome.org/ for more information about GNOME Circle.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bícha
people that had already expressed interest. No one that has been
interested in helping has been told they couldn't.
Regards,
Jeremy
maximilian attems wrote:
>
> so the xen team needs either to come with us or allow more of us to join.
> also basing their repo o
I ran across a dependency problem when dist-upgrading using apt-get.
The following packages were set to be removed:
libwxgtk2.6-0
libxine1
python-wxgtk2.6
vlc
vlc-plugin-alsa
wxvlc xine-ui
xlibmesa-glu
xserver-common
xserver-xorg
After some digging, I found some of the packages had dependencies o
I just felt like interjecting after having been reading up on this
tread. The whole multiarch situation is exactly why my workstation was
re-installed with FC5's x86_64 from the old Debian amd64 distro. Someday
when Debian has multiarch I'll switch it back but for now all my 64 bit
machines
Respectfully,
Jeremy T. Bouse
Will Lowe was said to been seen saying:
> You would send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED], along with the rest of
> your application.
>
> Be advised that Debian hasn't been processing new maintainer applications
> for a while now; the process is about
eckpoint and
NAI's solution among others... I have a sonicwall here in the office
but haven't been able to test it although sonicwall claims to interop
with checkpoint which would seem that freeswan would interop with it...
Respectfully,
Jeremy T. Bouse
UnderGrid
it atleast...
Regards,
Jeremy
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 05:21:23PM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> I'm hoping that one (or more) of the DDs here might be willing to
> sponsor one (or more) of the following packages. All of these have
> either an RFP or ITP filed for them.
hough
obviously the values after it were plural in the case of the other or
does it not matter? I'm just trying to better understand it so I can
setup pinning myself personally but also to setup the apt-get'able
repositories I make use of...
Regards,
Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Ralf Treinen wrote:
>> GPG keysigning coordination is since a long time done by a small
>> group of people independendent from FrontDesk. Currently this is
>> basically me, with an offer from Patrick Schoenfeld to help. In
>> the past tbm and Luk have been part of that team.
. I have separate keys for
personal, Debian and work use.
Regards,
Jeremy
Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any good documentation about best practices for OpenPGP key
> management? I plan to use gnupg (gpg), as it's conventional and seems like
> the &quo
. If this has changed I haven't seen anything
on it myself and would appreciate a pointer.
Regards,
Jeremy
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:02:39PM -0800, Philippe Troin wrote:
> I haven't look at OPIE for ages, but when using it with ssh, doesn't
> it force
ve had to make changes locally to install them because of
deficiencies in the PHP packages. Also there is an update to PEAR itself
which would have the potential of conflicting completely with the
current php4-pear package.
Respectfully,
Jeremy T. Bouse
pgpp4QjyKXXXB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I have one of my two Multias online 24/7 runnin Woody/stable
that might be of assistance...
Jeremy
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 09:04:59PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a problem with a package I maintain building from source on the
> Alpha archi
all itself anyway... I run it
on an internal machine that does run X11 then upload the generated firewall
script to the firewall via scp or sneaker-net...
Regards,
Jeremy
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 11:17:49PM +0200, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 08:
erly to queries.
Respectfully,
Jeremy T. Bouse
UnderGrid Network Services, LLC
Joey Hess was said to been seen saying:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Here's where theory and practice come into play. I only have a small chunk
> > of 203.36.158.* (113-127,
Can I get the ARM buildd to attempt rebuild of fwbuilder? The
build on the Jan 1 failed due to libfwbuilder 0.10.4 dependency however
it was built Dec 31st...
Jeremy
On 09/02/2014 12:28 PM, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02 2014, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>
>> there's a GPG option (via the the *-cert-level options, see 'man gpg')
>> to state how carefully you did verify their identity, but ultimately
>> it's up to you.
>
> That is not how I inter
On 07.09.2014 18:02, Adam Borowski wrote:
On Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 04:37:31PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi,
During Debconf14, I could chat with Joey about the future of
Tasksel,
and having a "More option" task, which would lead to a new screen
which
would propose more tasks.
Before anyone
On 11.07.2013 09:12, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
On 07/11/2013 14:15, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Lars Meyser wrote:
No I did not miss that, but I'm not entirely sure of the
implications. So if I
use a packaged version of a program which has been modified (e.g.
by Debian
pat
On 11.04.2013 15:35, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Completely unrelated to it's GSoC-eyness (which I would love to see,
quick, put it on the ideas page and put interested parties as
mentors!),
I really hate the idea of "loosing" an unencrypted copy of my GPG
private half. I misplace everything, I do
I've actually been in the process of working to transition from my
existing to 1024D key I created back in 2002 with my new 4096R key I
created in 2011 that I use 3072R subkeys on a OpenPGP v2 smartcard.
Unfortunately I haven't been able to get together with any other DDs to
perform a key signi
On 05.03.2014 04:01, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Le mercredi, 5 mars 2014, 10.47:07 Paul Wise a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Xavier Roche wrote:
> I have a rather silly question: would a mail (signed with this
key)
> request to the DDs who already signed the initial key (and checked
On 9/15/2016 10:19 PM, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2016-09-15 at 22:03, Ben Finney wrote:
>
>> The Wanderer writes:
>>
>>> On 2016-09-15 at 21:26, Wookey wrote:
>>>
I reckon a lot of us would be happier if you [Russ] (and Abou)
used the term 'users', rather than 'customers'. I know I think
501 - 537 of 537 matches
Mail list logo
