<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue Aug 13 21:54:42 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 4913 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2002 02:54:41 -
Received: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2002 02:54:41 -
Received: from (pub.foshan.gd
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed Aug 14 22:38:52 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 31545 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2002 03:38:51 -
Received: from unknown (HELO pub.foshan.gd.cn) (218.13.92.41)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 15 Aug 2002 03:38:51 -
From: =?GB2312?B?ue
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Aug 25 03:54:06 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 23287 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2002 08:54:06 -
Received: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2002 08:54:06 -
Received: from (buddy) [61.1
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun Aug 25 05:40:57 2002
X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 4964 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2002 10:40:57 -
Received: from master.debian.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 25 Aug 2002 10:40:57 -
Received: from (buddy) [61.14
retry the build, but my search engine foo is failing me.
How can I give back the build?
Or will it retry automatically?
Regards
Jeff
[1]
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?arch=all&pkg=gscan2pdf&ver=2.5.6-1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 12/09/2019 19:08, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> If you're a DD, then you can use the service described in
> https://debblog.philkern.de/2019/08/alpha-self-service-buildd-givebacks.html
Thanks to those who replied so quickly. The instructions worked a treat.
Regards
Jeff
si
appreciate any pointers.
Regards
Jeff
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
pplication as a
favorite?
Regards
Jeff
[1]
https://www.freedesktop.org/software/appstream/docs/chap-Metadata.html#tag-id-generic
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 02/01/2020 16:53, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> @Jeff Did your changes include adding a launchable tag? If not, adding
> one may already fix this issue.
Yes, I had.
> When transitioning:
> 1) Make sure you add a launchable tag - it may not be essential, but
> it certainly is more
name() is not in the Perl bindings for
glib (yet).
I'll add it, and confirm whether g_set_prgname() fixes the problem when
the updated bindings have filtered down to the users.
Thanks for all the help.
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
o
try it.
The user has confirmed that this solves the problem. Thanks for your help.
> Either way I'd recommend reporting the absence of g_set_prgname() as a bug
> (or at least a feature request), since it's sometimes necessary to control
> what GLib thinks the program'
ions in
stable, testing and unstable are Perl packages which use libgtk3-perl.
Can you explain?
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Andreas,
On 29/04/2020 12:11, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> reverse-depends -r testing -b src:gtk+2.0 2>&1 | grep gscan2pdf
> * gscan2pdf (for libgail-common)
> * gscan2pdf (for libgail-common)
Thanks!
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Desc
and I can't find the
right incantation to get gsettings to tell me the default email client.
Would someone mind putting me on the right track?
Thanks and regards
Jeff
[1]https://sourceforge.net/p/gscan2pdf/feature-requests/112/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ys do the right thing. It looks as though it is much better, now.
Thanks again for the detailed explanation - and also to the others that
answered.
Regards
jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.
Running the test outside the chroot with xvfb still crashes X, because
xvfb seems to grab the "real" X if it is there.
Is there a way of getting xvfb to ignore the system X?
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 29/07/17 03:31, Paul Wise wrote:
> This sounds like an Xorg/nouveau bug, please do report it:
>
> http://x.debian.net/howto/report-bugs.html
I did that six months ago:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=857620
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPG
ed when I call it from the wrapper?
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
tuff like this. See
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Prefix
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
is trying to use? Is that the virtual display created by Xvfb, or
> is it the actual X session you're running on?
Inside xvfb it is now :99
Before I tried all sorts of things to get it to ignore :0.
Thanks for all the pointers.
Dunno what was going on.
Regards
Jeff
signature.asc
Des
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I've created a mod_annodex package for Ubuntu, and I would love to see it in
Debian. Anyone want to lend a hand? :-)
deb http://people.ubuntu.com/~jdub/dapper/ ./
deb-src http://people.ubuntu.com/~jdub/dapper/ ./
Thanks,
- Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
However, your card is not a FlashPoint and does not require special
support. I have a BT948 and it works as well. But the BT930 and others
do not work without special support.
The BT930 and other FlashPoint cards are fantastic cards. I hope people
don't avoid them because of the Debian
atus,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ NameVersionDescription
+++-===-==-
pn elm (no description available)
41 root ~ # dpkg --get-selections | grep elm
42 root ~ # echo $?
1
--
Jeff Shein
Anyone have a digitized copy of this? :)
Thanks,
Jeff
On Wed, Apr 08, 1998 at 05:58:26PM -0400, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> OK, it has played here in the East. Those of you out west still have
> some time to find a radio ;-) I think it is the second piece on "All
> Things Considered&q
you logout.
If my idea of a useful default is different from yours, then let
us each have her way with a configurable file. Don't cripple
either of us by hardcoding the "better" default into the .deb
file.
Thanks,
--
Jeff Sheinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
omething like
> > that works with DOSemu...
>
> Caldera makes one, but it's not Open Source.
Last I checked, Dosemu came with FreeDOS, which AFAIK is Open Source.
It's not 100% working, but it's good enough to get most users up and
running, and they can re-sys their dr
Carlos C Soto wrote:
Great!
I use this module and wold be great to have it on debian.
I was thinking on put a RFP bug for it.
-- Carlos C Soto :: eclipxe
I agree. I just built it again today against 2.6.11-1-686-smp (after
using it for several months against 2.6.10-1-686-smp).
I talked to the dev
l
2) the /usr/lib/libsilc* symlinks are not correct
(wrong names or missing needed names)
3) /usr/lib/libsilcclient-1.0.so.2.1.0 is not the right name
4) the package itself is not the right name
curiously,
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ne symlinks. Almost everyone I know uses sid; I don't think
anyone is going to switch to sarge once sid is out.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
; and the only "stable" version of debian is ancient and
too old to use.
Enjoy,
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ct method of doing things here. Does it sound like I
almost understand it right now?
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
orate enviornment and the kinds of complaints that have been used
against debian deployment.
Enjoy,
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rts each version of their enterprice
edition for seven years.
I didn't know they had pledged to do that. Interesting.
How many days does it take in the US until a bank is bankrupt after a
critical part of their computer infrastructure is broken?
I don't know. Maybe we should run a test :)
Jeff
uggesting that the bar has been raised so high; the
standard and expectations set at such a lofty level that the general
public might be better served by a more detailed explanation of the
releases and the dangers. Again, like the text Adrian wrote a few emails
back I think is perfect and
;smart" in that it uses `uname -r`
to determine the kernel headers. So, one can just go into the dir and
type make;make install and spca5xx.ko will automatically be loaded the
next time the user boots.
So I guess I should start by looking at the files in
/usr/src/kernel-patches/all/2.6.11/
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 05:57:02PM -0700, Jeff Carr wrote:
Could someone give us a simple rundown of how we would submit a patch to
the debian kernel sources to add spca5xx support? The spca5xx driver
adds support for a large number of USB cameras. Recently Carlos posted
the work of cleaning up mplayer. I hope it gets
included soon.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ing through the queue so fast)
- David Nusinow
OK, that's great to know. Well, I hope mplayer gets some renewed
attention then.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
licensed under the GPL and should be included in Debian.
No codecs are packaged inside of transcode & it is completely usable
with OGG/OGM.
Jeff
PS: of interest to the mplayer thread: motion.c allows mpeg-1 & mpeg-2
support for non-commercial software. AKA: GPL/LGPL'd implemen
nd you details of any corrigenda
"""
The 009695399 in the www.opengroup.org URI looks to be a publication
number of some sort (one digit shy of an ISBN though); it is used by the
wikipedia entry (where I first found it), and the similar 9-digit bit of
the URL in the Debian susv3 in
the original definition is now somewhat archaic. Amateur
Radio, however, is the more formal and widely accepted term.
3. http://www.arrl.org/
4. http://www.arrl.org/pio/bwhatis.html -- See Section 5
-Jeff
KE7FRJ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this?
Thanks,
Jeff
I think we need to make ELF part of the kernel for Debian-1.0. It doesn't
make sense to have it as a module anymore.
Jeff
>
> Package: e2fsprogs
> Version: 1.01?
>
> During boot up the harddisk is checked before the modules (binfmt_elf)
> are loaded. The fsck/e2fsck u
I think I am going to rewrite run-parts in C. I don't know perl and don't
have the time to learn it just to fix run-parts. :)
Jeff
> Harald Schueler writes ("Bug#1895: run-parts does not run scripts without
> #!/..."):
> > Package: miscutils
> > Version
rograms in util-linux and where they appear in
the Debian distribution.
Thanks,
Jeff
PS - should I also post this to debian-user?
- snip -
util-linux
program - debian package name
disk-utils/
fdformat - miscutils
fdisk - miscutils
fsck.minix- m
I wish that all of the programs we need from util-linux
> were distributed separately, that way we could package them individually.
> I'd prefer to split util-linux into smaller packages, if you have time
> to do that.
I'd prefer it that way. I'll work on it.
If anyone else has any comments, please send me a note.
Thanks,
Jeff
Ian Jackson writes:
> The whole design of system() in Perl isn't conducive to good
> error-trapping. I suppose it might be better to use fork oneself.
>
> Jeff (you're the maintainer of this package, aren't you?) - would you
> like me to send you an update that uses
Ian Jackson writes:
> Bruce Perens writes ("Re: miscutils snag/questions for all"):
> > [Jeff Noxon:]
> > > Do we really want
> > > programs like fdisk to evolve differently in different distributions?
> >
> > Fdisk is a special issue. There is a n
do on a heavily loaded system.
The BogoMips calculation was only intended to calibrate delay loops in
the kernel.
Regards,
Jeff
> > fleabag> cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep BogoMips
> > BogoMips: 33.55
> No - the /proc/cpuinfo doesnt get updated as the time goes by. It only
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Absolutely.
Jeff
I agree: I don't see why the setfont command needs to be there at all.
I think most people are used to the default font their video card
provides. Why change it?
Jeff
> A friends system recently installed with Debian just booted in 80x50
> and set the font incorrectly, resu
ackage for developers, after all. :)
Jeff
B and 8MB machines have the most to lose here.
Let's save -O3 for packages that can benefit from it, like X servers and
math applications.
Jeff
tered with 7 different
ncurses libs, all incompatible. There must be a Better Way.
Jeff
> ncurses1.9.8 will be released really soon now and contains:
> dist.mk ==
> # If a new ncurses has an incompatible application binary interface than
> # previous one, the ABI version should be changed.
> VERSION = 1.9.8
> SHARED_ABI = 2.2
> On Fri, 8 Dec 1995, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> > If the ncurses guys are going to keep blowing off binary compatibility,
> > then perhaps we should not mess with ncurses at all.
>
> I suspect, especially now that we've got the package load spread around
> more, that D
> On Fri, 8 Dec 1995, Jeff Noxon wrote:
> > I have several months of the ncurses list archived. If anyone is interested
> > in having a copy of the archive, please let me know how to deliver it. :)
>
> How big is it?
1.3MB uncompressed, 450K gzipped.
Jeff
I wrote:
> I've been waiting for this, waiting, waiting, and now it's out!
Hmm, that's the first time an autoreply has gone back to the list instead
of the original author. Guess it'll teach me to check twice.. :)
Jeff
es it
a bad format to store documentation in.
I believe there is already a program to do info->html, but if I recall
it uses 10's to 100's of megabytes of VM to do its job. Not exactly a
well-written program... :)
Any programmers out there itching for something to write?
Jeff
trick Volkerding about this a few months ago. I've attached
a piece of our correspondence.
I think it would be great if we could add these manpages. Something
is better than nothing. I can't stand `info'. :)
Jeff
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 16 17:01:10 1995
Return-Path: [EMA
to put in man pages but say they're not maintained.
I still don't see what's wrong with the FreeBSD manpages. They were written
specifically for the GNU programs we're using, and they have been useful to me
on a number of occasions.
Jeff
(In fact /var is a separate filesystem on mine.)
In fact, isn't /etc guaranteed to be on the root filesystem? I don't see
how a system can boot without it. Why move initrunlevel at all? I think
other distributions will leave it in /etc.
Jeff
ng ifconfig or route for some reason.
Jeff
ny case, I can't get SLIP or CSLIP to work with DIP.
On *my* machine, it works fine. I'm not sure why; our kernels are
almost identical.
Thanks,
Jeff
This has been reported before as a bug. This time I just thought i'd
chime in and say "me too."
Thanks,
Jeff
>
> Package: base
> Version: 0.93.6-13
>
> It is utterly unreasonable for the system to try and do fsck's when the
> system is booted with '
27;re still excellent products. :)
Merry Christmas!
Jeff
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> : It doesn't really matter if a 152X gets detected before a high-power
> : whiz-bang SCSI-matic 2010 PCI adapter, because you can still put root
> : on any SCSI controller you like.
>
> You are correct, of course, J
n a device-order basis, the way things work now.
Does anyone know how NT does this? I guess I could play around with it
and see what Norton Disk Doctor turns up.
Thanks,
Jeff
so _highly_ recommend the DEC PCI cards, and also
the Kingston PCI cards. The Kingston cards use the DEC ethernet chip,
work with the DE4X5 driver, and cost $60-$70. Not bad for 1MB/sec
transfers.
Jeff
bably retain this one in some shape
or form just to keep familiar users happy.
In any case, I expect to release a new version of miscutils this weekend,
depending on my health after some minor surgery on Friday. :)
Thanks,
Jeff
> Package: miscutils
> Version: 1.3-5
>
> The BU
Something similar happened last time I upgraded init -- to Bruce's ELF
version.
Shouldn't packages doing stuff like that do some postinst _after_ rebooting
the machine? They could just add an rc file that removes itself once it
executes.
Thanks,
Jeff
Helmut Geyer <[EMAIL PROT
omeone wants to fix the PCI probing so it works
as a module. Doing so is completely safe, but for some reason the
driver won't do it.
Thanks,
Jeff
Note that current 1.3.x kernels seem to have everything in /proc/ksyms,
instead of just one page. Using that information, psupdate and System.map
are completely unnecessary.
Jeff
Re comments such as:
| > Getting dselect to install the packages I wanted was a real pain [...]
| Yep, I didn't care much for dselect either. [...]
1) I think dpkg / dselect / ... are tremendously important
and impressive! I'm used to the convenience of the SGI
package management system,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| Until now, the Linux community has always ignored
| the problem with the crypt() function; it is part
| of the Linux library, both the source and binary
| releases but _officially_ you are *not* allowed to
| export this from the US!
Do we know this to be true? I'm not up to
.
You can make local versions, you just can't give them to anyone else
unless it's in the form of a patch.
--
| Jeff Teunissen -- President, Dusk To Dawn Computing -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Disclaimer: I am my employer, so anything I say goes for me too. :)
| dusknet.ddns.org is a black
fusion somehow.]
The POC handles Objective-C by translating it to C++, IIRC.
--
| Jeff Teunissen -- President, Dusk To Dawn Computing -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Disclaimer: I am my employer, so anything I say goes for me too. :)
| dusknet.ddns.org is a black hole for email.Use my Reply
I intend to package EPM, the Easy Software Products Package Manager.
(Actually, I've already packaged it, so this is more an "intent to
upload to woody".)
License: GPL.
Package: epm
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: devel
Installed-Size: 110
Maintaine
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 10:34:54PM +0100, Matthias Berse wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 03:16:56PM +0100, Martin Waitz wrote:
> > compile devicd3dfx-source and you are done :)
> Am I the only one where make-kpkg modules-image fails on devicd3dfx? I
> have to do it manually! But maybe that's relat
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 01:17:56AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> > However, I'ld like to see a standard meta-info files about
> > the package, which had informations necessary to create a packages, like
> > compilation commands, files (including inf
It seems like they've given up their rights by calling it public domain
in a public forum...
Debian needs a lawyer for things like this.
Regards
Jeff
On Thu, Mar 16, 2000 at 04:51:51PM -0800, Jakob 'sparky' Kaivo wrote:
> Damian M Gryski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&
CUPS 1.1.2 packages have been installed into woody.
I know, I know: if you wanted package updates, you'd subscribe to
debian-changes. But, I've received several requests via private
E-mail as well as in the BTS, so I thought a more general announcement
was warranted, since it seems to be in some
;ll be willing to ITP
> some.
Qt 2.2 hasn't been released yet. Supposed to be released soon (Thursday?)
though.
--
| Jeff Teunissen - Pres., Dusk To Dawn Computing - deek at dusknet.dhs.org
| Disclaimer: I am my employer, so anything I say goes for me too. :)
| Core developer, The
re along the line, this quite reasonable, non-derisive suggestion was
turned into "I demand you beg my personal forgiveness for violating the GPL,
and by the way, GNOME is still going to bury you", which is completely
derisive and completely unreasonable...and which never happened.
--
I hope a developer out there with access to commit packages can take the
initiative to package up agentcell. The authors settled on releasing
this software package under the GPL. It's a great contribution to the
scientific community.
Just thought I'd pass on the word,
Jeff
--
To U
On 08/15/2005 01:16 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2005, Jeff Carr wrote:
>
>> I hope a developer out there with access to commit packages can take the
>> initiative to package up agentcell. The authors settled on releasing
>> this software package und
"localhost".
Just as a sanity check, Solaris ships with:
127.0.0.1 localhost loghost
FreeBSD ships with:
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.my.domain myname.my.domain
I don't have access to AIX, HPUX or other major Unices, but I bet in the
hosts file, 127.0.0.1 is immediately
On Sat, 2005-10-08 at 23:04 +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Saturday 08 October 2005 22:07, Jeff Stevens wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 16:26 +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > "localhost.localdomain" and "localhost" must be swapped. The first
> > entry
ults in the resolver properly
returning localhost when resolving 127.0.0.1.
In summary: (1) It's reasonable to expect DNS and file based resolution
to function the same in regard to 127.0.0.1/localhost (proper DNS
resolution of 127.0.0.1 is documented in RFC 1912). (2) There is a long
histor
of 127.0.0.1 to return localhost? That is, localhost
shall precede any other aliases in /etc/hosts.
Again, thank you. Attention to detail is quite important; in this case
detail is the location and/or existence of a mere 21 bytes.
-Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
where as if you package it
for just Rails, other Ruby users may be missing out.
.Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 01/17/07 00:22, Loïc Minier wrote:
> The Debian menu system is completely useless to me, and I expect to
> most GNOME and KDE users.
You've hit the nail on the head. That whole thing came about from
earlier times. I wish you every luck in purging it from existence.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 01/16/07 20:22, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Thus their goal is to help win market share,
That's an important goal.
Have you heard this before: the fear is that not gaining significant
market share will allow Microsoft to effectively render free software
unusable by the average user.
> not to he
that is so, however apt-mirror is scripted so one could also argue
that this expectation is unjustified.
Thanks for your thoughts and your time,
Jeff.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 22:22, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It should not take us an indefinite time to release with
> firmware blobs gone. I'll stake my reutation that the period involved
> is not indefinite, and there is a upper boundary to it.
>
>Testing out th
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 09:21, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How can that be? (That is an ernest question)
Because that's how the hardware works. If you are making a widget and
you need a fpga or hybrid chip of any sort, then you generate a binary
blob using the chip manufacturers too
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 07:21, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Your argument boils down to: There is function that will never
> be supported by free software. Annoying people by asking them to expose
> their function by freeing the software just irritates them, so we
> shou
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:35, Lennart Sorensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 06:38:53PM -0700, Jeff Carr wrote:
>> Because that's how the hardware works. If you are making a widget and
>> you need a fpga or hybrid chip of any sort, then you gener
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:26, Lennart Sorensen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would expect anything on opencores.org to be perfectly readable VHDL
Hardly perfectly readable - I put up code there too :)
> code, which is the prefered format for manipulating it. So what was
> your point again? B
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 05:36, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> similar tools to modify the blob (even if it is only useful to do so on
>> a different board / with a different chipset)?
>
> Ish. Someone else should be able to use the same tools (barring
> development environment issues) b
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 03:10, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just want to find out: Under what circumstances does the blob need to
> be modified and who gets to do that modification?
Probably only the hardware engineers.
> Are these "chip manufacturer tools" physical tools/machine
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
