-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 30 Jun 96 17:56 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Jim Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: zircon
Version: 1.17p1-1
Binary: zircon
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
zircon: An X11 interface to Internet Relay Chat.
Cha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 23 Jun 96 22:50 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Jim Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: auctex
Version: 9.3c-3
Binary: auctex
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
auctex: An integrated environment for writing TeX/LaTe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 30 Jun 96 22:34 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Jim Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: netpbm
Version: 1994.03.01p1-1
Binary: netpbm
Architecture: i386 source
Description:
netpbm: netpbm -- graphics conversion tools.
C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Date: 30 Jun 96 22:33 UT
Format: 1.5
Distribution: unstable
Priority: Low
Maintainer: Jim Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: netpbmdevel
Version: 1994.03.01p1-1
Binary: netpbmdevel
Architecture: i386
Description:
netpbmdevel: Netpbm development libraries a
> it also runs h2ph in the foreground, when there's no good reason why it
> shouldn't run in the background and let dselect get on with the rest of
> the install process.
Some people don't like this (IMO, very sensible) approach. So there
needs to be options given. What I'm going to do is write
> I believe that the 3 first extra explanatory lines in file `xbase.postinst'
> of this package should be removed as they trigger unexpected result in some
> cases (can go into an infinite loop as Xsession will call itself if you
Perhaps the Xsession should be
for i in `grep -v "
Much of this discussion (talking about MS-DOS, assembler code, etc.)
has no real place for debian developers. I've asked Bruce to say
something, and he told me to ask you all to please move this
discussion off the list. Please take it to private e-mail or
something for now.
Jim
ation of either
perl or wg15_locale, hence, I have reported this bug.
I also just reran perlconfig just to make sure that it is configured
as designed. I can produce the error message anytime perl is
executed, for example, "perl -v" will produce the error message.
--
/-----
If anyone out there has pppd working with slirp, I would surely
appreciate getting a copy of their chat and options file (remember to
edit our the password!).
I've been trying on and off for weeks now, spending 15 minutes trying
to figure out why pppd dials, seems to connect, and then hangs up
On Thu, 22 Aug 1996 02:01:47 -0400 I wrote:
< re pppd and slirp
I must have been really tired when I sent this -- I don't know why I
wrote debian-devel in the To: list. Well, nobody responded but I
figured it out anyway. It seems as though problem was likely to come
partly from the kernel not h
Package: smartlist
Version: 3.10-1
Hello,
I noticed a few problems with the smartlist when I installed it (to
check out whether or not it is a candidate to replace majordumbo)
My first thought was that the postinst should probably ask whether or
not it should set up an announce mailing list --
I just had dselect run through the latest and greatest in rex, and
then found out that something in there broke gcc's ability to find
cc1. I just added the directory to my path, and got gcc working
again, but I believe one does not normally need to do this. Gcc
should know where the correct prep
> But you need a list to test it.
Right, but we might want to create "smartlist_tester" to test it.
> Ok. I can ask for it.
Thank you!
> newaliases could only run when the automatic announce list is generated.
Well, my point was that newaliases isn't _on_ my system, and if it
fails the postin
Package: xypic
Maintainer: Erick Branderhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 3.2-4
xypic depends on mflib, yet it seems to overwrite mflib's 1.0.8's
/usr/sbin/install-fmt-base with a different file.
[lestat:/usr/local/pub/debian/tex]# dpkg -i xypic_3.2-4.deb
(Reading database ... 32572 files and
Package: amstex
Maintainer: Nils Rennebarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 2.1-1
one of amstex's file seems to conflict with amsfonts, and it can't
seem to find a tfm file it needs. This is the same error that was
triggering massive multi-megabyte log files before, and I am thinking
that error mig
Package: dpkg
Maintainer: Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 1.3.14
I think dpkg may be broken -- when installing dvipsk it seems to
either ignore or eat some files in the deb file. I manually unpacked
the dvipsk.deb file with dpkg-deb --extract, and the config.ps file
was there. Yet whe
Maintainer: Nils Rennebarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 2.6-2
Provides: kpathsea
Whenever I run dvips or xdvi I get a long list of "Errors" which show
MakeTeXPK trying to create fonts that already exist. I'm really not
sure if this is kpathsea's fault, but it is the one running MakeTeXPK.
I gue
> Its not compiled for 16bpp.
Could such programs then have a note telling us about that in the
description? It looks bad when one downloads software and gets a core
dump trying to run it. I think many people are running 16bpp, and
many more will be running it as 2meg become the default -- is t
Package: gcc
Maintainer: David Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version: 2.7.2.1-1
I don't know whether or not this is a gcc bug, but after I installed
the latest rex stuff, gcc stopped being able to find cc1. After I
added /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/2.7.2.1/ to my path it worked, but I
never needed t
> Are you sure you don't have another gcc or cc1 in your path? The gcc
> provided in the gcc package knows its own path.
Ah hah! gnats or dpkg seem to be the culprite:
[lestat:~/.www/unabomber/unabomber_writings]$ locate gcc|grep "gcc$"|xargs
file|grep -i exec
/usr/bin/gcc: ELF 32-bit LSB exec
> It's *gnat* , not *gnats*. GNAT is the GNU Ada Translator; GNATS is
> the Problem Report Management System :-)
Right, sorry -- I was coming down off of being wired on expresso and
not thinking/reading/associating very clearly.
> override altogether (perhaps supplying an ada-gcc executable, whi
> Why is ae the default editor for vipw/vigr even on a completely
> installed system?
>
> Doesn't VI-gr/pw suggest that a VI clone is executed? I can
> understand to use ae as a fallback editor, but not as the main one
Probably it is setup for the same reason ae is the default editor on
the bas
> However, I remember a discussion that, I believe, lead to this decision; >
I
can't remember all the discussions that have gone on here, there so
very very many. ;-)
> IIRC, it was the same idea that made ae (wrongly) essential - "all other
> editors can be removed, so ae is a better fallbac
> According to /etc/mh/mtstailor, "lockstyle: 1" apparently means to do the
> correct form of Debian mailbox locking, however `inc' isn't setgid mail so it
> can't create the lock file.
Just sticking in my two cents.
I'm curious as to what changed on Debian to make this a requirement
for mail pr
Check out the new map showing developer locations:
http://www.debian.org/devel/developers.map.jpg
The marker file used to generate this can also be viewed:
http://www.debian.org/devel/developers.coords
***
As was decided when discussing the developer database,
developer names are not shown.
***
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 06:26:19PM -0400, Hugo Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 1999, Philip Hands wrote:
> > Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I have the feeling that I missed something, but anyway as I don't manage
> > > to
> > > find it in the archive: how can we find out what our passwo
I should have used https://www.debian.org/ in the original mail.
Sorry. Everyone who can (legally) use ssl should use that URL.
Additionally, I have asked for a page to be linked from
db.debian.org to describe what those who have lost their
password should do.
Someone else will have to explain wh
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 12:53:23AM +0100, Phil Hands wrote:
> Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 01:26:19PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > > Check out the new map showing developer locations:
> > > http://www
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 08:45:16AM +0100, Phil Hands wrote:
>
> As it happens, I just got an Epson Stylus Photo EX, so should be able
> to a pretty decent A3 version.
>
> Is the image it uses for the Earth actually scalable up to that size,
> or is it likely to go blobby? If it's not up to it, a
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 12:52:49PM +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Wed 22 Sep 1999, James A. Treacy wrote:
> >
> > I should have used https://www.debian.org/ in the original mail.
> > Sorry. Everyone who can (legally) use ssl should use that URL.
>
Aack. I write www.deb
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 11:02:03PM +0200, Colin Marquardt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when doing a package search for "gpg" from the main page, I´m
> getting some hits, where two pages
> (http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/utils/gpg-idea.html and
> http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/utils/gpg-rsa.h
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 09:29:35PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 01:39:41AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 04:26:27PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > Also use of computer in planes is discouraged and prohibited during
> > > landfall
> > > and ta
On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 11:55:10PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> Have you all seen the nice developers' map at
> http://www.debian.org/devel/developers.loc ?
>
> Here's your chance to help make it better!
>
> The map is generated by xplanet. However, we have a few slight problems
>
> 1) xpl
e a point in forcing the issue when we were
so close to the freeze.
Once potato is released, we will work on getting
all the packages updated.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
g packages should work
with all the mesa* packages in frozen. If the packages need to
be compiled for the first time for one of the ports, it is
a trivial fix.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:15:03AM -0600, BugScan reporter wrote:
>
> Package: glut-doc (debian/main)
> Maintainer: James A. Treacy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 61366 /usr/doc symlink not made
>
New glut packages are being uploaded to fix. Note that
glut-data was the cause of
uot; -> Installation Instructions
>
It has been changed to point to /releases/stable/. The change
will be visible after the next mirror update tomorrow.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
g to be a necessity.
>
> I don't have much time right now, but I'd be happy to help when I do
> (in October, most likely).
>
>Julian
>
It's easy to set up. I'll do it after the scripts have stabilized.
--
James (Jay) Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 01:50, Ryan Murray wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 06:48:06PM -0500, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Don't reopen bugs just because you think it's not fixed, I've spent
> > three or four hours testing libtool on mips this evening and I've not
>
> I'm not convinced it'
Version 3.39-1 of the file utility changed the format of the output line
for MIPS shared libraries again.
Older versions of libtool.m4 use the file utility and a regular
expression to determine if something is a shared library or not. This
regular expression does not match the new file output for
On Fri, 2003-07-04 at 06:01, Joey Hess wrote:
> The file format is the same as a debian changelog file, but we leave off the
> asterisks generally, and use bigger paragraphs explaining news items when
> necessary. It might be a good idea to run your file through
> dpkg-parsechangelog to check its
installations or users
resulted in your post/point being lost. 100 million users =
10000 users - it should just be 100 users?
-James
--
James Michael Greenhalgh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://opendoorsoftware.com
open minds providing open source solutions
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 09:18, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * (Nathanael Nerode)
>
> | I'm sure no DDs want to volunteer *while* there's someone officially
> | in the job and the DPL is "satisfied" with them, as it might be
> | perceived as an attack, and wouldn't have any effect anyway! If the
> | D
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 01:15, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> Currently, when a source package is unpacked, all the files that have
> modifications in diff.gz are given somewhat "random" timestamps. This is
> because patch updates their timestamps as it processes the diff file.
>
> Because of this, there
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 19:34, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:25:16PM +0200, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 08:39:11PM +0300, Halil Demirezen wrote:
> > > Are we in dilemma on "should we support arch that are not used
> > > widely?" or "We should support all a
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 21:23, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> Now you're assuming that I have access to the Debian machines. TMK,
> these machines are *not* public access machines, but instead are
> accessible to full DDs only. This excludes all new maintainer
> applicants, myself included.
>
Ask the
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 16:40, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 04:25:57PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 19:34, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> >
> > > So, are you volunteering to help those of us without access to
> > >
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 16:59, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 09:08:54 +0100, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 08:55:15AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> >> (2) Since all people say that having an account on the Debian machines
> >> is the major reason tha
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 19:59, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Jamin W. Collins writes:
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 06:28:42PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >
> > > I think he just wants them kept open until the old gcc versions get
> > > removed from the archive. That does make a certain amount of sense
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 14:58, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> > I think at least the RCness of this bug is rather dubious, frankly. If
> > the script is configuration
>
> I don't think the script is meant to be edited... So it should be in
> /usr/sbin.
>
I've edited it, and I'd bet I'm not the only one w
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 23:25, Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-01
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: geeklog
> Version : 1.3.8
> Upstream Author : Tony Bibbs and geeklog community
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 03:05, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Tags: patch
>
You forgot to attach it :-)
> > I've edited it, and I'd bet I'm not the only one who has a
> > dog/cat/turtle/etc who keeps knocking the power button, resulting in a
> > change to scheduling a shutdown in 1 minutes time :)
>
> I
On Sat, 2003-08-02 at 03:38, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> >> Tags: patch
> > You forgot to attach it :-)
>
> Shit. And the BTS doesn't seem to have noticed the patch tag...
>
You meant to put "tags 203588 patch", "thanks" and Bcc
[EMAIL PROTECTED], didn't you? :-)
> > Event-handling from cardmgr, ho
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 03:32, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Today I was reminded of something that causes apps not to migrate into
> sarge. When maintainers remove old libraries from the archive! Today
> for example libexif8 was removed by Christophe Barbe and replaced by
> libexif9. Guess what that doe
On Mon, 2003-08-04 at 22:12, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> I just found this, maybe aîuseful read
>
> http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1060025253&count=1
>
"I used apt-get to get aptitude. I fired up aptitude."
The writer is obviously a moron if he did this with such ease and it
never occured to him h
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 19:39, Oliver Bausinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 August 2003 20:01, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:10:24PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > > Interessting analysis. Many things that hold up the release can only be
> > > solved by active and expe
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 21:49, Chris Cheney got eaten by the Troll:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:10:01PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > I've always thought KDE a wonderful example of what happens when you
> > give commit access to just about anybody too.
> >
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 00:43, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 August 2003 00:34, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le mar 19/08/2003 Ã 23:33, Mike Hommey a Ãcrit :
> > > Ok, let's google a bit, and shazaam !
> > > http://www.linex.org/sources/linex/debian/linex/nvidia-glx_1.0.4349-1_i38
> > >6.d
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 08:35, JÃrÃme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Le mar 19/08/2003 Ã 23:33, Mike Hommey a Ãcrit :
> > > Ok, let's google a bit, and shazaam !
> > >
> > http://www.linex.org/sources/linex/debian/linex/nvidia-glx_1.0.4349-1_i386.deb
> > > O
[ Moved to debian-devel, I don't think this is relevant to private as
the GNU crack is well publicised ]
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 14:58, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 12:35:44PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:51, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > What do you s
On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 20:16, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> Scott James Remnant:
>
> > No problem, this is only a quick run -- others may find ways to improve
> > this script somewhat.
>
> What did you use to determine which packages to check? I notice that at
> least m
On Thu, 2003-08-21 at 11:18, JÃrÃme Marant wrote:
> No, no, no! You don't get it. There may be a majority among the
> debian-legal zealots, but we need a consensus among Debian as a
> whole (which means voting of course).
>
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> We musn't let the bigots decide for us! ;-)
>
On Fri, 2003-08-22 at 03:02, Miles Bader wrote:
> Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Jerome demonstrated a clear understanding of the Social
> > Contract and the Debian Free Software Guidelines."
> >
> > Perhaps you would c
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at 04:51, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> Im having problems compiling libextractor on at least ia64 and m68k
>
> On those arch's dpkg-buildpackage fails with
>
> libtool: compile: unable to infer tagged configuration
> libtool: compile: specify a tag with `--tag'
>
libtool hasn't fou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On September 08, 2003 20:28, David Meggy wrote:
> from debian/rules install line
> (cd build && $(MAKE) install prefix=$(CURDIR)/debian/gcc4arm/usr)
>
Hi David,
Dunno about 'prefix=' ... I've always used 'DEST
(CC'd as I'm not positive you're subscribed to this list)
On Tue, 2003-09-23 at 22:34, Andrew Lyon wrote:
> Since installing Debian in May the amount of disk space required for my OS
> has risen from 1.5GB to 3GB and has reached the limit of the partition.
> I don't really want to allocate any
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 11:23, Richard Atterer wrote:
> I've fixed a critical bug in w3c-libwww and now want to regenerate all the
> libtool/autoconf/automake files. Not trivial!
>
> With the same libtoolize/aclocal-1.4/autoheader2.13 under unstable, the
> latter gives "FATAL ERROR: Autoconf versi
I was interested how we're doing according to AJ's original timetable,
so had a read and see how we're doing given we've just passed the third
date milestone...
This is given "without comment", that is I'm not trying to start a
flamewar here.
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 07:49, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 06:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 05:57:58AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
>
> > > * September 1st
>
> > > HOWTO use debian-installer to install sarge posted to
> > > -devel-announce (v
On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 09:49, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:16:28AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > i have developed a system in python which abstracts from the backend too.
> > moreover it is easily expandable with python plugins. it is also easy to
> > develop new applicati
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 12:41, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Oct 2003 15:58:46 -0500, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >But it would not be nice to not have the things that would leave with it
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 23:42 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> I don't know if it's feasible, but my ideal vision for how the new
> version tracking would handle bugs in stable would be that if the
> version in stable is affected, the bug is left open if it's tagged
> sarge or if it's of RC severity;
we were using being partially incomplete for a while.
The latter problem seems to have been fixed, and the Canonical sysadmins
are working on the former.
Sorry for any inconvenience,
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
Ubuntu Development Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 23:30 -0300, Gustavo Franco wrote:
> On 4/2/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As some of you may have noticed, the patches.ubuntu.com website and
> > equivalent mailing of changes to the Debian PTS and ubuntu-patches
> > mailin
On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 14:32 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> As some of you may have noticed, the patches.ubuntu.com website and
> equivalent mailing of changes to the Debian PTS and ubuntu-patches
> mailing list has been offline, or at least intermittent, for a few
> weeks.
>
."
"No, you mean two gibibytes! A gigabyte is ten-to-the-nice
bytes, whereas a gibibyte is two-to-the-thirty bytes!"
*punch*
"Ow! You broke my nose!"
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
Ubuntu Development Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
the use of powers of two multiples altogether, no?
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
Ubuntu Development Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 15:50 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 09:24 +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > The difference is a sufficiently small percentage, that most users will
> > not care.
>
> No, like I said in my earlier post, the error grows quickly.
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 16:50 +0100, (``-_-´´) -- Fernando wrote:
> Actually bandwidth is mesured in bits per second and no bytes per second
>
> On 6/12/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Bandwidth should be quoted in true SI units over a metri
rounded
anyway. If you really want to know how many bytes are available, you
can use this great unit called the "byte" which is accurate and not
subject to change[0].
Scott
[0] Unless you're older than 25.
--
Scott James Remnant
Ubuntu Development Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 15:01 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
> 1 TB is not rounded. It means precisely 1 × 10^12 bytes, no more and no
> less.
>
No it doesn't.
The meaning of 1 TB depends on the context, and has always done so.
Scott
--
Scott James Remnant
Ubuntu Development Manager
[E
e here about the issue to help
raise awareness of the problem again.
James
[1]
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=readline6;users=d...@debian.org
On Apr 28, 2010, at 11:32 AM, James Y Knight wrote:
After checking a scattering of random packages, I happened across
one example of this already in Debian testing: socat. It is GPLv2-
only, and is linked against GPLv3 libreadline6 in testing. (filed
bug 579494).
One further note: Fedora
> One of my concerns about upstart is that systems that want to
> use SELinux and upstart _have_ to also use an initramfs, which is yet
> another component of the system that has to be audited. There have
> been patches proposed, and semi-rejected b the upstart folks, who are
> of the opinions tha
> This does mean that when you use something like screen, the tty it was
> connected to is from then on unusable, right? As the cgroup that
> contains the screen process also contains the getty and it doesn't
> kill one without the other as that is in no way reliable :-)
>
Yes.
I investigated usi
> OTOH, it is not obvious to me anymore that Debian should commit to
> Upstart now that systemd has appeared and it has many compelling
> features. I believe we should consider systemd's merits and wait and
> see how it will work in the next Fedora release and if SUSE will
> really adopt it.
>
I'm
> What is so bad about init scripts? Where am I supposed to put my init
> script magic[1] in an upstart scenario?
>
Upstart job configs go in /etc/init
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
> It is still on the wishlist, but the needed pieces are not ready, so
> it seem unlikely to happen this late in the release process. At the
> moment, I believe it will happen shortly after Squeeze is released, if
> the needed pieces are ready by then.
>
I will be at DebConf all week.
I'll be th
> Or just have per-user cgroups that a process is moved into when
> logging in, see libpam-cgroup for something that does this.
>
Then getty would respawn the second you login, stealing the controlling
terminal from bash.
> In addition, killing all members in a cgroup when a service goes down is
> > I have never rejected any SELinux patches for Upstart; I have simply
> > never been *sent* any.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=543420#10
>
This pretty much proves my point. I was never sent these patches,
instead Debian kept them to itself and never attempted to get the
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 21:19, martin f krafft wrote:
> I'd appreciate if you kept your opinions to yourself,
>
Can you do the same?
Scott
(Unsigned as I've already packed my keyring for Linux Expo today)
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 07:33, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Does anyone happen to know why .la files hardcode the paths to .la files
> that they depend on?
>
To guarantee that you don't end up linking with something totally
different if the app being compiled happens to have a different search
path.
What
merged
> into gnucash proper?
>From /usr/share/doc/gnucash/README.Debian:
The postgressql backend is not currently enabled. Upstream is updating
this backend to support all the features in the 1.8.x series. Once
that work is complete, postgresql support will be added back in.
--
James
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 21:32, Chris Cheney wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 02:58:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I think the problem with .la files may be solvable by updating
> > Build-Depends and -dev packages' dependencies to refer to libxrender-dev
> > (>= 0.8.3-1), and/or libraries th
On Sat, 2003-10-11 at 13:37, John Hasler wrote:
> Joe Drew writes:
> > "Note: IRC support is not available in azureus because the library being
> > used for IRC support has legal issues."
>
> "Note: IRC support is not available in azureus because the library being
> used for that has legal proble
On Sun, 2003-10-12 at 02:31, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On the shared library side, we already have the NEEDED field in ELF libs
> which is more elegant; so the .la's are redundant (and, indeed, can get
> in the way). I understand Scott is working on fixing libtool so that it
> doesn't try to redund
Cc'd to debian-devel, because I'm honestly unsure about this...
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 09:51, Adam Conrad wrote:
> Package: libtool
> Version: 1.5-3
> Severity: serious
>
> libtool fails to build from source on all the buildds[1] due to a missing
> build-dep on texi2html.
>
libtool (and libtool1
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 14:44, Marc DequÃnes wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
Ya know, sometimes Quality and not Quantity is better ;-)
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 21:26, martin f krafft wrote:
> I am going to be away from my machine(s) starting 22 Nov until the
> middle of December. I currently have 1 RC bug and several other bugs
> against my packages. If sarge's release will happen in 2003, I will
> bite the bullet and fix these bugs
On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 09:41, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:09:39PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>
> > And what about the other people that Like James? Can they too
> > not be wrong?
>
> There must be something true in
901 - 1000 of 1132 matches
Mail list logo
