Hey - Don't get ripped off!
http://www.terima.net/ss/
Penis Enlargement Patch That Works!!!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Our new online members service.
Become a member to use the new online home for all \"TRAMPS\" worldwide.
www.trampmagazine.com.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:55:18PM +0300, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi!
>
> I'll be glad to see any suggestions.
>
> Package: task-printing
Ideally, printing shouldn't require a task-package. :-(
--
James Deikun, Techi
bloated than the old 'flavors' system.
--
James Deikun, Techie(tm), CSI Multimedia
The opinions expressed &c.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Hunt
* Package name: out
Version : 0.0.1
Upstream Author : James Hunt
* URL : https://code.launchpad.net/~jamesodhunt/+junk/out
* License : GPL-3.0+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Utility for producing
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Hunt
* Package name: procenv
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : James Hunt
* URL : https://launchpad.net/procenv/
* License : GPL-3.0+
Programming Lang: C
Description : utility to dump all aspects of its
news, focusing quite a large portion of it on Debian News.
Although this may seem like a huge journey, I am willing to embark on
it, and I would love for others to help. We need a people run community
website, and I would like to help create one. Have a great day!
Thanks in advance,
James
Thanks
for reading. Have a nice day!
Thanks in advance,
James Gallagher
at removing netplan can
deconfigure the network even if its backends are still installed?)
Out of curiosity, what's the recommended workflow for doing this?
[1]: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1442352/
[2]: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1508124/
Cheers,
Lukas
Best,
James
OpenPG
Pornography may be offensive to some. Is the package description for
hot-babe accurate? Are people who do not want it installed being
forced to install it?
People who may be offended by the package should read its description
and make up their own mind about whether or not they would like to
insta
Debian system administrators are too busy to deal with this
> then I would be happy to help.
No thanks.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signatures are. Care to send URL to pages explaining the
> topic?
As per 'apt-cache show dpkg-sig':
Website is http://dpkg-sig.turmzimmer.net/
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpEBswLX1uTA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nugo need be installed is not. In fact, that part of
the description could become invalid depending on the development of
both gnugo and ladder.app.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpOCDBYDPUI7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
count
So, shouldn't your Reply-To: header be:
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-devel@lists.debian.org
or
Reply-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
instead of your current:
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which is useless since the From: header is used when there is no
Reply-To: header.
Hi,
I would like to advertise at your website.
Please get back to me ASAP, I really want to close a deal today.
Thanks,
James Hunter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This communication contains information which is privileged and confidential
and is exclusively intended only for the individual or entity
es in handy. You
could send the email to the bug via that alias and then CC the person
you're discussing the patch with.
James
--
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpkbE3C7W7hx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
;it does not work". I thought it
> more as a feature request (or idea) than bug report. I was asking about
> how is aptitude supposed to solve such situations, beacuse it isn't clear
> if it really should try to guess the correct packages to install.
The aptitude in unstable and tes
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Package name: libsocket++
Version : 1.12.12
Upstream Author : Herbert Straub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.linuxhacker.at/socketxx/download
* License :
Description : a family of C++ cla
On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:52:35PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Copyright Notice:
> > -
> > Copyright (C) 1992-1996 Gnanasekaran Swaminathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Permission is grante
ed libreadline for
some of my packages.
Also, I'd imagine there were other bugs fixed in 2.01.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
mean that the maintainer for XEMacs is gone?
No it just means my old ISP decided to remove my account without
telling me. Nice of them eh? :) My new address is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jim
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@http://www.dimensional.com/~dres | Lin
om
unstable to bash-2.01 without problems, as did "netgod". And from the
fact that two developers uploaded libreadlineg2 dependent packages, I
assume that it didn't hose their machine either. I'm truly sorry it
did for you :-(
I'll have a look at the info you've
machine being used?
Cut and pasted from bash_2.01-0's debian/rules, but enough to get the
idea? :-
ARCH = $(shell dpkg --print-gnu-build-architecture)
make [ ... ] CC=$(ARCH)-linuxlibc1-gcc [ ... ]
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe&quo
stribution, but if I don't there are two packages with
unsatisfied dependencies.
> At least I couldn't find the readline package.
It's in ~troup/ on master for now. Caveat; Use at your own risk, the
package worked fine for me and someone else but not for Christian.
--
James
free Unix.'' (3.1.4.1 of debian-policy 2.1.3.3)
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
vided by sh. Adding csh/tcsh would be
overkill, IMO.
> Basically, it seems that this policy doesn't quite apply correctly.
I totally agree with what Galen said: the policy is a guide not
something to be applied to the letter, and IMO a good one and on the
whole most maintainers have got
absolutely *stunningly* bad idea IMHO.
This really should have been discussed before you implemented it
(apart from anything else you've made a new package essential so
discussion is required by policy).
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscri
s-Archives/debian-devel-9711/msg00919.html>
--
James - {,}.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble?
e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
call ldconfig in
> its maintainer scripts.
The packaging manual is wrong; this is a long standing bug.
> Why is it calling ldconfig?
Because it's the Right thing to do.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
un ldconfig?
> What does the ldconfig do, if the symlinks are already there?
RTFM. Also, try it and see. I dare you to take a bo machine, rebuild
hamm's bash and remove the C postinst which runs ldconfig and then
install the resultant debs.
(Hint: it tells the dynamic linker that the libr
, the ld.so author &
maintainer, says the packaging manual is wrong; are you *so* confident
you're right and everybody else is wrong that you're going to tell him
he's wrong too?
I give up.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
get the predependency, since it doesn't
> make sense for it to be inconsistent with all those other packages.
Now that is the single most lame reason I've yet to hear for a package
to have a Pre-Depends:.
> Of course, we still need new text for the packaging manual. Try as
>
age with a maintainer who can't do
uploads for unstable is about as good as a package which is orphaned.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
04-2) has only a Depends. Perl-base is
Essential and it's Pre-Depends are definitely a good thing, for, I
hope, obvious reasons.
> netstd, elvis-tiny
I'm not sure why elvis-tiny has Pre-Depends, I'm not convinced it
should. I don't know enough about netstd to know if it&#x
Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I (and a couple of friends) are using Debian on a A1200 without
> prob, so I guess that it's 'finnished'... :)
It most certainly is not.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "
es have yet to be compiled and a
further 204 are out of date. Debian/m68k is not finished and it is
not released.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
eamlined and feature free implementation?
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
f with debug symbols put it in a libfoo-dbg.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
ispute that)
[1] According to Michael Johnson on the pam list, which,
unfortunately, doesn't seem to be archived.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
"Adam P. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, are .elc files arch-dependant or arch-indep? I've always
> wondered about this.
They're architecture independent.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" t
D]>
Cc: Debian developers list
[ ... ]
--- End of forwarded message ---
[Note the Cc: to iwj, despite the fact he's obviously on debian-devel]
Interesting to note that those whining about duplicate mails and
advocating the Reply-To munging are themselves creating duplicates.
-
Alex Yukhimets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When doing 'g'roup reply in elm, the e-mail of the person goes into
> the "To:" header and list address (along with all other thread
> participant's adresses) to "Cc:" header.
So, umm, fix elm?
--
J
g reporting) and you don't have
to a source release to do a non-maintainer release, just add a new
entry to the changelog before you recompile.
What advantage do you see in *not* changing the version number?
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscr
ber is
wrong, IMO. What you think our packaging system should be doing at
some unspecified time in the future has nothing to do with it.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
't
> depend on libpam-util. I don't see why a library package should
> depend on a binary one.
I think you should look at pam before making statements like that.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Hi,
I'm going home for a week or more, if any serious[1] bugs in my
packages come up, please feel free to do non-maintainer uploads of
them.
Happy Christmas and all that larky.
[1] And, please, I do mean serious, i.e. not whether /x/y/z should or
shouldn't be a conffile.
--
Jam
"Boris D. Beletsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If not, shouldn't we schedule one already. What are we waiting for?
Gee, I dunno, maybe it's, at least in part, for the developers who
still haven't upgraded their packages to libc6, despite it being
availabl
however have a problem with those same
people asking questions like "What are we waiting for?"
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
't that be better tested if it were uploaded to unstable?
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
links using SNMP. MRTG generates HTML pages containing GIF images
which provide a LIVE visual representation of this traffic. MRTG typically
produces daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly graphs.
installed-size: 418
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Heiko, can dupload be changed to upload all files with one "scp"
> when using SSH to upload?
See #13383.
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
ark off 100% pointless recompiles on other architectures.
o it serves no purpose. The only source change is to the changelog,
and that is included in the deb. And it doesn't help the rational
of this policy (that is: source, or no source, dpkg/dselect will
still recognise foo_1.2-1.0.1
essential. It by no means matches the definition of
it. It probably could be raised to a higher priority though.
> CL> should be found on *every* Debian system.
>
> Done :).
Christian was talking about the bug package not yours.
> This package uses standard.
Uh, why? How is it
Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> cd /debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386
Grr.
cd /debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-$(dpkg --print-installation-architecture)
--
James - Hardcoded-i[345]86 detection alarm triggered
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail
n trailing zeroes?
Yes. 20 > 15 -> 1.20 > 1.15
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
want to move on now.
Rob> I think Mark is willing to put the startup change into emacs 19,
Rob> and if James is willing too, then we're set. Until that's done
Rob> I can just make emacsen-common conflict with xemacs, which I
Rob> believe is no worse than the current sit
pen("/etc/ld.so.preload", O_RDONLY)= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/etc/ld.so.cache", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open("/lib/libc.so.6", O_RDONLY)= 3
Dres
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
inn diff (which says more about
my lack of life than anything else), or packaged theirs, so I'll
upload mine. It'll be section devel, I guess, and priority extra
(it's main use is for people with exotic (i.e. non-i386) hardware,).
Any objections?
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ sleep is linked with libcrypt ]
> That's weird since it's in fact linked with libcrypt, but doesn't
> seem to use _any_ function/symbols from this lib:
Everything in shellutils is linked with libcrpyt, build it from
e similar licence.
It bears the *same* license; it's a port of scsh, how could it be
arbitrarily relicensed?
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be an obscure bug in dpkg (?) which causes
directories to not be noticed as directories but as files, creating
false overwrite problems. See #20250 for more details (including a
-D2773 log)
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ends. YANMU uploaded to
master
I'm going to promote #12717 to important and report important bugs on
all the others. Any objections? (I hope no one thinks
non-libc5-compat libc5 packages should be in hamm when it's released).
The script used to obtain the above information is of cou
Their functionality has been integrated into the upstream source so
they are obsolete.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hen
announce you're working on the non-free vile? I'm confused.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% of the debs because
they are not the size where bzip2's savings really kick in. So for
the vast majority of cases you'd do nothing but slow installation down
and increase the already heavy cost in memory of installation.
> BTW: tar can handle bz2 files. you can use
> --use-com
m).
Having said that, I'm a lot less opposed to this idea than I am to the
idea of using bzip2 for debs.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
27;t anticipate that RSN). It'll be
maintained by "Igor Grobman and James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>".
I know this is controversial, but quite frankly, I don't care. The
current ``policy'' was invented by Christian with zero consultation
(he ``thought it was alread
move my l3 package from frozen. Thanks.
File a bug against ftp.debian.org.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Igor Grobman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, could you explain to me how this advertising clause is so
> harmful?
http://www.oryxsoft.com/rms/rms-bsd-license.html>
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Briscoe-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Urk! It's the Obnoxious BSD Advertising Clause, back to haunt us.
>
> Including the OBSDAC would make Moxa non-free.
Say _what_? I do *not* think so. (Hint: look at glibc's copyright
file)
--
James
--
To UNS
examples of licenses
|that we consider "free".
Let's please end this FUD now; the advertising clause is extremely
obnoxious but it doesn't make software non-free.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e: there are several useful acronym lists / search systems on the
> web [ ... ]
and the `jargon' package in doc/
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rograms
being Qtized are owned by the FSF and the authors haven't been
informed for the programs (or they don't have a problem with it).
Dres
--
@James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be!
@http://www.dimensional.com/~dres | Linux is kewl!
@"Argue for your
hers like it is available at:
http://home.att.net/~SAMIGWE>
I'll take it as read that there are no objections. How could there
be?
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
try and
hijack the packages.
Any objections?
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to Martin Mitchell[1], I don't
expect for anyone to complain without extremely good reasons. What
objections have you got to me maintaining mawk and gawk?
[1] Just an example, Martin doesn't want it, and I don't plan to give
it up RSN.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ ... ] ld.so doesn't apply [ ... ]
Upgrade your quinn-diff :-) From 0.31's ChangeLog.main :-
| Sun Apr 12 21:33:14 1998 James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| * Packages-arch-specific (ldso): exclude alpha.
I said (among other things) ``For the record I don't really
think it's a good idea to flout policy and I regret suggesting that.''
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not a "significant bug" and I have no idea what
makes you think it is.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, it was gfetting frustating, what with being in the middle of
> two conversations, one with Dale and James, who are of the opinion
> that policy is a guideline, and not a set of rules adopted by the
> project
Again, please don
nd will not
start recompiling core applications with a previously unused (*in
Debian*) library, one month into a freeze. The decision to postpone
PAM integration till 2.1 was made a long time ago (see the list
archives).
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s (I'm thinking, X, *Emacs*, gcc,
binutils etc.) over a 28.8 would scream bloody murder. Please think
very hard about the benefits of our current system before advocating a
replacement for it.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ Gratuitous Cc to maintainers who already read debian-devel removed;
please respect the Reply-To ]
Christian Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > It'll be maintained by "Igor Grobman and James Troup
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". I know this
I was not talking about pine-src, as I made clear in the parts of my
message you cut out.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t; Sure it does. You put the dependencies on the Depends: line of the
> control file.
You can do that in the .dsc file too, but it suffers from the same
problem, i.e. what to do with source dependencies like svgalibg1-dev,
which are arch-specific when .dsc files (or source debs, whatever)
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> More specifically, I don't think that late in the frozen stage is
> the right time to introduce a new package format requirement for
> hamm.
Nor do I, which is why I've been avoiding this discussion.
--
James
--
To UNS
8
>
Moved to some `Dead' directory in master, I can't remember the
location of offhand. Copyright renders it undistributable IIRC.
> *** tex Opt latex2rtf1.1-6
>
> *** web Opt cgiemail 1.2-3
>
No idea.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ntil recently still #3xxx era bugs filed by previous
m68k maintainers about source packages being unbuildable from source.
I think Dirk may have fixed the last with his upload of autopgp, I
can't check right now though (nameserver problems).
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
ss
> it in the bug list.
You've certainly received 2 from me WRT to *imlib.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
should not use killall,
killall is Evil[1]. Packages using killall should be fixed not to use
it rather than depend on psmisc.
[1]
http://www.nl.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-devel-9801/msg01205.html>
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &quo
Brandon Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now about that hard one, what are we releasing this time[?]
m68k is certainly going to if I have anything to say about it.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
h, you realize that anyone using dselect and installing custom will
> be FORCED to install both gnus and w3...?
Yes.
> Having these packages depend on a certain version of custom would be
> wiser.
You can't. There is *no* way round this other than to upgrade gnus if
you inst
rely
you don't want custom to conflict with something it depends on?
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you do fix all the known bugs, it's
_way_ too late in the game to put an automatic call of update-passwd
back in the postinst.
--
James
~Yawn And Walk North~
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nerated from Debian are
stated as such and give an Ubuntu address where users can get support.
--
James Treacy
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Take care
James
--
URL: http://www.mortgagesforbusiness.co.uk
Title: Buy to let mortgages
Description: Excellent rates on buy to let mortgages
--
URL: http://www.mortgagesforbusiness.co.uk
Title: Commercial Mortgages
Description: Commercia
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fish
Version : 1.9.1
Upstream Author : Axel Liljencrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://roo.no-ip.org/fish/
* License : GPL
Description : a friendly
I think one of the biggest hassles with instant messaging is that its tied to the computer. If Im away from the computer, like watching tv, I may miss an important IM. I can leave the speakers on the PC really loud, but then Im always jumping up and running back to the PC to read an incoming IM
room. These outages are currently
scheduled as follows:
0900 UTC Wednesday, June 29th
0900 UTC Sunday, July 3rd
The expected downtime is about an hour each time. Sorry for the late
notice and any inconvenience.
- --
James
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Co
On (28/07/06 12:12), Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:53:22 +0100, James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > On (28/07/06 10:03), Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> >> pe, 2006-07-28 kello 00:03 +0100, James Westby kirjoitti:
> > But, yes, like all of
1 - 100 of 1132 matches
Mail list logo
