Sorry if this is off-topic, but I can't help asking if that "15381 March 1977"
was on purpose or just from some wonky email client: 15380 days after March 1st
1977 happens to be April 10th 2019, so...
--
Pengcheng Xu
https://jsteward.moe/
> -Original Message-
>
What the hell is all this crap?!?
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Hi,
I took a look at your site a couple of hours ago...
and I want to tell you that I'd really love to trade links with you. I think
your site has some really good stuff related to my site's topic of stickers
and would be a great resource for my visitors as it deals with some great
Hi,
I took a look at your site a couple of hours ago...
and I want to tell you that I'd really love to trade links with you. I think
your site has some really good stuff related to my site's topic of fasteners
and would be a great resource for my visitors as it deals with some great
Hi,
I took a look at your site a couple of hours ago...
and I want to tell you that I'd really love to trade links with you. I think
your site has some really good stuff related to my site's topic of psychics
and would be a great resource for my visitors as it deals with some great
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jirawat Iamsamang
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-protobufjs
Version : 6.10.2
Upstream Author : Daniel Wirtz
* URL : https://protobufjs.github.io/protobuf.js/
* License : BSD-3-Clause
P
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sagar Ippalpalli
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-beeper
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Sindre Sorhus (sindresorhus.com)
* URL : https://github.com/sindresorhus/beeper
* License : Expat
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sagar Ippalpalli
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-deprecated
Version: 0.0.1
Upstream Author: Fractal
(http://wearefractal.com/)
* URL : http://github.com/wearefract
Hi,
I prepared the packaging of materia-gtk-theme. It is lintian clean
and tested with pbuilder.Further information about this package can
be accessed from the URL :
https://salsa.debian.org/isaagar-guest/materia-gtk-theme
It would be nice if it is maintained under Debian desktop group
On रविवार 04 फेब्रु 2018 10:49 म.नं., Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 04, 2018 at 09:59:56PM +0530, I Sagar wrote:
>> I prepared the packaging of materia-gtk-theme. It is lintian clean
>> and tested with pbuilder.Further information about this package can
>> be
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sagar Ippalpalli
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name : golang-gopkg-data-dog-go-sqlmock.v1
Version : 1.3.0-1
Upstream Author : DATA-DOG
* URL : https://github.com/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sagar Ippalpalli
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,
pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
* Package name : golang-github-zyedidia-glob
Version : 0.0~git20170209.dd4023a-1
Upstream Author : Zachary Yedidia
* URL : ht
Hi, all.
Maybe I choose wrong list, but I didn't find more suitable list for such
mail.
I wrote small scripts which should help to build chroot enviroment. I
know already exists such things like 'makejail'. But I wrote my own
version of 'how to chroot specified packages
;chroot', not another debian installation.
2. Does not need to start/stop service (like makejail), sometimes
it's not possible. For example I try to create another chrooted env
on machine where executes 200 apache and I could not stop apache. Also
makejail creates chroot on heavy-loaded mach
e. "player" alone means very little and
> > is likely to cause confusion.
>
> Yeah, I already thought about it. I'll probably name the final package
> something like player-gnome or player-gstreamer. Really, I'm going to
> talk with upstream about it.
>
Tho
) command
needed.
Probably you have to call ldd_handle.pl for each external binary file. I
think the one solution for such cases does not exists. But I think
the better it's just chrooted only needed files from packages like fileutils,
but not
the whole package (why you need command like ls, dir? i
Hi, I successfully upgraded to hamm from a very recent CD. I've got
netscape, Realplayer, mxaudio, & lots of other non-debian stuff working
(2.0.33-pre-1 :), so the distribution seems to be working pretty well.
However, there ARE some bugs, of course. I'll report them h
I suppose I got related problem.
Here are my /etc/apt/preferences
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=etch
Pin-Priority: 900
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=sid
Pin-Priority: 400
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian,a=experimental
Pin-Priority: 300
Package: *
Pin: release o=Debian
Pin-Priority
My computer tells me it has located "new hardware" yet can not seem to
find a driver for it. What is this?
Thanks for any help you can give me
Jay Zeller
11245 131st Lane
Kirkland WA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi
I do still have the problem with ADS that it does not accept any input from
keyboard after the upgrade to xorg 7.0. I am using it in a chroot
environment, without problems but I would like to get it working as before
the upgrade. All other programs are working perfectly with xorg 7.0
I
Hello.
Why apt/dpkg doesn't use bzip2 for Packages file?
-rw-r--r--1 root root 749427 Sep 3 00:56 Packages.bz2
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1024180 Sep 3 00:56 Packages.gz
It's about 25% can be saved in download.
wbr, Serge.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Thus spake Sergey I. Golod ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Why apt/dpkg doesn't use bzip2 for Packages file?
> > -rw-r--r--1 root root 749427 Sep 3 00:56 Packages.bz2
> > -rw-r--r--1 root root 1024180 Sep 3 00:56 Packages
David Starner wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 03:15:10PM +0600, Sergey I. Golod wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Why apt/dpkg doesn't use bzip2 for Packages file?
> >
> > -rw-r--r--1 root root 749427 Sep 3 00:56 Packages.bz2
> > -rw-r--r--
Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Yeah, but I guess it would take about twice the time to unpack. Please
> > > don't do that to my poor 486 :-((
> >
> > But extra size = extra traffic = extra money, that's worse. Unpack no cost
> > at all
> > (except
$B"#5^$0$"$J$?$N6/$$L#J}!*%"%$%(!<%+!<%I$N%b%P%$%k%-%c%C%7%s%0(B
$B"#$*?=$79~$_$+$i?69~$_$^$G:GB.(B20$BJ,!#5^$J=PHq$G$*:$$j$NJ}92$F$kA0$K$^$:Ev\:Y$*$h$S%a!<%k$G$N$*?=$79~$_$O%"%$%(!<%+!<%I(BHP$B!!(Bhttp://www.i-a-ai.com/aiei/index.html
$B"#$*E
$B"#5^$0$"$J$?$N6/$$L#J}!*%"%$%(!<%+!<%I$N%b%P%$%k%-%c%C%7%s%0(B
$B"#$*?=$79~$_$+$i?69~$_$^$G:GB.(B20$BJ,!#5^$J=PHq$G$*:$$j$NJ}92$F$kA0$K$^$:Ev\:Y$*$h$S%a!<%k$G$N$*?=$79~$_$O%"%$%(!<%+!<%I(BHP$B!!(Bhttp://www.i-a-ai.com/aiei/index.html
$B"#$*E
Hi,
I took a look at your site a couple of hours ago...
and I want to tell you that I'd really love to trade links with you. I think
your site has some really good stuff related to my site's topic of chat
and would be a great resource for my visitors as it deals with some great
aspec
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pyqwt3d
Version : 0.1.3
Upstream Author : Name Gerard Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pyqwt.sourceforge.net/
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pyqwt5
Version : 20070303
Upstream Author : Name Gerard Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pyqwt.sourceforge.net/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qtiplot
Version : 0.8.9
Upstream Author : Name Ion Vasilief <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://soft.proindependent.com/qtiplot.html
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ngspice
Version : 17
Upstream Author : Paolo Nenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://ngspice.sourceforge.net
* License : "Old
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: easyspice
Version : 0.6.7
Upstream Author : Jean-Marc Routoure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://easy-spice.sourceforge.net
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gspiceui
Version : 0.9.33
Upstream Author : Name Mike Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.geda.seul.org/tools/gspiceui
* License
Hi Gunnar, list,
first of all thanks for the summary and reminding us all of the things
we discussed those days. Let me quickly expand on the bits that involve
CPANPLUS;
On Oct 3, 2007, at 5:59 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
When talking with Jos Boumans, I basically had to eat my own words: I
Hi
I have a strange problem when building the sdcc package. Compilation fails
with the following message:
ccache i486-linux-gnu-gcc -pipe -ggdb -g -O2 -Wall -I. -I../.. -
I./../../support/Util -I. -c sdcclib.c -o sdcclib.o
i486-linux-gnu-gcc: No such file or directory
but if I manually
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson"
* Package name: liborigin2
Version : 20081216
Upstream Author : Stefan Gerlach
* URL : http://liborigin.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : l
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #662736
Owner: "Pedro I. Sanchez"
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #662736
Owner: "Pedro I. Sanchez"
Package: wnpp
Followup-For: Bug #662736
Owner: "Pedro I. Sanchez"
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package na
Dzień dobry,reprezentuję nowoczesnej Agencję Interaktywną.Zajmujemy się budową
nowoczesnych oraz profesjonalnych Stron i Sklepów internetowych. Jeżeli mogę
przedstawić Państwu nieodpłatnie naszą aktualną propozycję dla Państwa firmy to
bardzo proszę o odpowiedź o treści "tak" na t
Dzień dobry,zajmujemy się budową stron i sklepów internetowych dla firm. Jeżeli
chcieliby Państwo otrzymać bezpłatną, niezobowiązującą propozycję na ten
tematprosimy o odpowiedź TAK na ten e-mail. Jeśli mają Państwo skonkretyzowane
wymagania dotyczące oferty, prosimy o wskazówki.--Serdecznie
Package: wnpp
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Owner: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson"
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: python3-trove-classifiers
Version : 2022.12.1
Upstream Contact:
* URL : https://pypi.org/project/trove-classifiers/
* License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sao I Kuan
* Package name: idseq-bench
Version : 0.0~git20191121.9623264
Upstream Author : Chan Zuckerberg Initiative
* URL : https://github.com/chanzuckerberg/idseq-bench
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sao I Kuan
* Package name: recan
Version : 0.1.2
Upstream Author : Yuriy Babin
* URL : https://github.com/babinyurii/recan
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : genetic distance plotting for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sao I Kuan
* Package name: smart-open
Version : 1.11.1
Upstream Author : Radim Rehurek
* URL : https://github.com/piskvorky/smart_open
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : utils for streaming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sao I Kuan
* Package name: ncbi-acc-download
Version : 0.2.6
Upstream Author : Kai Blin
* URL : https://github.com/kblin/ncbi-acc-download
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Download
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sao I Kuan
* Package name: insilicoseq
Version : 1.4.6
Upstream Author : Hadrien Gourle
* URL : http://github.com/HadrienG/InSilicoSeq
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A sequencing
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sao I Kuan
* Package name: seirsplus
Version : 0.0~git20200528.5c04080
Upstream Author : Ryan Seamus McGee
* URL : https://github.com/ryansmcgee/seirsplus
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sao I Kuan
* Package name: cwlformat
Version : 2020.05.19
Upstream Author : Kaushik Ghose
* URL : https://github.com/rabix/cwl-format
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : opinionated
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sao I Kuan
* Package name: duckpy
Version : 2.1.1
Upstream Author : Alisson Lauffe
* URL : https://github.com/AmanoTeam/duckpy
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A simple Python library for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sao I Kuan
* Package name: benten
Version : 2020.06.03
Upstream Author : Kaushik Ghose
* URL : http://github.com/rabix/benten
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Language server for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sao I Kuan
* Package name: dukpy
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Alessandro Molina
* URL : https://github.com/amol-/dukpy
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Simple JavaScript interpreter
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pau Garcia i Quiles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: witty
Version : 2.1.0
Upstream Author : EmWeb bvba
* URL : http://webtoolkit.eu/
* License : dual licensed (GPLv2, commercial)
Description : C++ web fra
Quoting Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
* Pau Garcia i Quiles [Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:36:59 +0100]:
* Package name: witty
Wt (pronounced 'witty') is a C++ library and application server for
developing and deploying web applications.
If the author names their softwa
by the Kopete IM application since KDE
4.2.
.
Download URL:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libmsn/libmsn-4.0-beta1.tar.bz2?modtime=1226519186&big_mirror=0
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pau Garcia i Quiles
* Package name: libopenspotify
Version : 20100217
Upstream Author : Noah Williamsson
* URL : http://eternalmedia.se/openspotify/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pau Garcia i Quiles
Please note Spokify 1.0 is not available yet (it will be in a couple of
weeks, according to the author). I am submitting this ITP so that the ITP
for libopenspotify (which Spokify depends on for now) I filed a while
minutes ago is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
when I am booting with de new linux-image-2.6.37-1-amd64 it hangs.
in the console the information is:
[0.788804] Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init
: http://projects.tevs.eu/osgppu/downloads/osgPPU-0.4.0.tar.gz
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Andreas Cadhalpun <
andreas.cadhal...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I don't have an opinion about ffmpeg vs libav, apart from how hard the
>> soname transitions are, especially in ubuntu where we somehow ended up
>> with ex-multimedia package
k than 100 *really*
> minor security updates.
>
How is it better to have libav, which does a lot less security bugfixing,
in?
I'd rather have a library that fixes bugs than one that passes in order to
look "more secure". When in fact it's less.
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www
s. Looks
good to me. Maybe Andreas should have made a not-so-polite proposal?
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I personally don't have enough information to know why libav was chosen
> instead of FFmpeg, and the discussion on debian-devel so far has mostly
> come from FFmpeg advocates. So there's probably another side to the story
features.
Since before the fork, the libav developers have been sabotaging ffmpeg as
much as possible, in every "combat field": library names, library versions,
taking distributions hostage (ffmpeg package that installs libav!?), etc.
This is not the way to fork anything. This is a
Hello,
I am the maintainer of witty, a C++ library for web development.
In addition to the latest version of Debian, I provide backports of the
package for all the supported versions of Ubuntu in a PPA, and for Debian
oldstable in an OBS repository. I have been doing this for years.
So far
been an log struggle between the nodejs package and the node
> package, which is still unresolved (bug #611698 for example) And I
> wonder now what the future should look like.
>
> To summarize the problem:
> * the nodejs upstream binary is called "node", and the upstream
&g
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Hi Pau,
>
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 04:24:21PM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>> Regarding the often-mentioned "many users run 'node script' from the
>> command-line"... so what? If we can get enou
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> 3) Make a new source package containing every jQuery version existing in the
> wild, then build depend on that.
FTP Masters do not like that solution.
Vincent's question was due to FTP masters complaining about the
package '
ancement to uupdate if it could deal with a list
>> > > > of files (wildcard strings that could be feed to `rm -rf`) which should
>> > > > be removed from the upstream tarball? This could simplify repackaging
>> > > > to a certain amount.
>> > >
haël proposes is indeed not good
but I'd say this one would clear the issues:
"The program ust include source code for all the files that are used
in building the Debian binary packages"
Which means:
- If upstream is including jquery.min.js but I'm not using it because
I'm u
s of this?
>> http://lintian.debian.org/tags/source-contains-prebuilt-windows-
> binary.html
>
> This includes:
>
> tcltrf (source)
> * win/msvcrt.dll
>
> This is part of Windows. I don't expect Debian has been granted
> permission to distribute it. :)
Are you sur
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Pau Garcia i Quiles , 2012-08-17, 13:39:
>
>>> 3) Make a new source package containing every jQuery version existing in
>>> the wild, then build depend on that.
>>
>> FTP Masters do not like that soluti
a minifier may use generate
shortened variable names randomly.
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think the debate in this thread is about whether it makes sense to
> require removing the minimized version from the upstream source when we
> don't install that file or otherwise use it in the binary package (because
> t
nrelated
> packages, possibly many of them, will become RC-instabuggy.
I'd say it's not a problem.
If one day the package containing the corresponding source vanishes
from the archive, the other package (witty, in my case) would not be
buildable, as witty build-depends on libjs-jquer
Hello,
I am having trouble with my package jquery-jplayer (a JavaScript library
with Flash fallback) and I would like to ask for advice on how to proceed
Major and minor releases are available as zip files from the official
website ( http://jplayer.org/download/ ) and they are tagged in the git
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
> On 17/05/2013 01:01, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> >
> > Patch releases are NOT available as zip files and the list of
> wrongdoings is long:
> > - Patch releases are only available
Hello,
What is the right way to contact the Security Team? I have tried the
tracker, and a variety of e-mail addresses but nothing yet (maybe I'm doing
something wrong?). An update to Debian 7 was released today without a
security fix for my package jquery-jplayer, even though the fix has
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Thomas Koch wrote:
I'm currently switching my laptop (again) and I have the following vision:
> The Debian system should provide tools to make it possible to switch over
> from
> one machine to another in a matter of minutes without le
b for a
> couple of years. We recently ran Mayhem on almost all ELF binaries of
> Debian Wheezy (~23K binaries) [2], and it reported thousands of
> crashes.
>
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
Hello,
I am the maintainer of Wt [1], a C++ web development library (think of Qt
or Gtk+ for the web) and web server.
My upstream [2] sent me a mail asking about mixing C++03 and C++11. My
understanding is it is not possible for a variety of reasons, unless all
players take great care (see [3
of
> 5-year security support. This support only applies for packages in
> main. A common example is nginx which is in universe. Packages in
> universe are just unsupported. They may or may not get any security
> support. If you need to advocate for Debian vs Ubuntu, I think this is a
&g
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 11:48:13PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > > Russ already replied and I agree with its reply. Just to say that
> Debian
> > > usually has a 3 year support. This is the kind of misguiding t
upgrade the kernel to LTS+1's ?
>
AFAIK Ubuntu does not add drivers for new hardware to any version save for,
maybe, some exceptional cases (that I cannot remember, frankly).
Quite the opposite: it's the hardware manufacturers themselves who are
compelled to provide drivers f
duty as Debian
> > developers. Sure, packaging new upstream versions is always more exciting
> > than fixing a broken version/package but it needs to be done.
>
> You seem to be saying "this is an important thing to do - will you
> all please go and do it".
>
>
ity team. Of course some package maintainers do help.
>
> I consider it part of my responsibility as a package maintainer to provide
> security support for my packages for as long as Debian does. If I felt
> like I couldn't do that, I would orphan the package or look at having it
> rem
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:48 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
Ubuntu uses a combination of driver backports and newer kernel versions
> in LTS releases.
>
>
As Clint, Philipp and you say, I was wrong.
However, I don't see that as an insurmountable argument against Debian
LTSs. It &q
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
Does anyone even know for sure what the decision to switch was actually
> based upon?
>
Not really, but I have seen Debian rejected at several companies
(customers) due to too-short support of old releases and too-far away
releases. Bo
e, especially if we
want 5 years support for the *whole* archive (IMHO Ubuntu did a smart move
in regards to support when it split the archive in main/universe/multiverse
and decided to support only main).
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
;s how I'd like the Security Team to work. It would
alleviate the burden on them and move the bugfixing/security fixing to the
people who know the package better and are probably in touch with upstream.
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:53:47AM +0200, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
> > But I'd like to stress we need *all* developers to be involved fix bugs
> > (esp. security) in their packages in all the supported releases, not on
7;t respond?
>
>
Then, and only then, as a last resort, the Security Team / LTS Team takes
care of the problem
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Neil McGovern wrote:
> I think you have a very valid point here. I kind of doubt many people
> would
> > like to run on a five year old desktop.
> >
>
> Stats seem to disagree:
>
> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/operating-sys
nes which only have a CD
reader can use USB or an external DVD unit and let the project move to
DVDs.
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > Why are we still talking about CDs? Didn't everybody move to DVDs a
> century
> > ago?
> And then they moved away from DVDs too.
> I guess we are talking about install images to download (where you usuall
ux of the issue and it is not specific to JavaScript
> libraries, anything that is interpreted has this issue. I'm pretty
> sure I've seen API breakage in libraries implemented in Python for
> example.
>
>
I agree.
So far it seems I have been pretty lucky with my package wit
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Roland Mas wrote:
>> Requiring the non-minified file to be provided in the same source
>> package is not a very productive use of our time.
>
> Right. In the same way that providing the source for our binaries
> isn't very producti
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Zygmunt Krynicki
wrote:
> W dniu 27.10.2011 11:22, Pau Garcia i Quiles pisze:
>
>> I said this in the original thread and I'll repeat it here: if we have
>> the non-minified JavaScript, then I see no problem in providing only
>> the m
e what's worse: a malfunctioning application or an insecure one.
Zygmunt's proposal of adding unit testing, etc to upstream is a noble
one but highly unrealistic, IMHO.
--
Pau Garcia i Quiles
http://www.elpauer.org
(Due to my workload, I may need 10 days to answer)
--
To UNSUBSCRI
ls-mingw-w64.
>
> Is there a principle behind all this or where can I help to clean this up?
> ;)
>
> Cheers,
> Fabian
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@l
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Does mingw[32] have any particular advantages over mingw-w64, I wonder?
Not that I know. mingw-w64's CRT is more complete (it includes LFS,
which mingw32 does not, for instance), includes more up-to-date
compilers and handles t
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> So if I understand it correctly, it would be best to entirely drop mingw32,
> gcc-mingw32, mingw32-runtime and the other members of that family from
> Debian and concentrate on mingw-w64 (which then, as a bonus, could be spl
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
