Re: Singapore Linux Conference

2000-12-23 Thread exa
ve sex in public places. > > You can do the same in Finland, except having sex in public places, > like parks, is not very popular, due to sub-zero temperatures and > snow up to your balls... Arrgh. Trying to supersede highly respected members of this list in going off-topic? :) Cheers

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread exa
so I presume the upgrade corrupts something in the way. How do I fix this? please reopen the bug thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread exa
r anything and ended up with a broken xinit. How can this be possible? Regards, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread exa
ght that review by wider audience would be instrumental in that. [+] Not because I'm especially fond of the developer in question. It is not a matter of personal liking. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread exa
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 01:16:22PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > 2a. Install (or recompile) the specific packages from unstable that fix the > bugs That I should have done... -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread exa
things that do not interest me at all... Are you guys on crack? -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread exa
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 04:39:43PM -0200, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > Branden, please understand this for what it is meant: "Branden does not like > to be poked. He seems to like even less to be poked by you. Please don't > poke him, he'll bite back and we get to watch the fallout." > Great kiss

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread exa
per, I might have felt hurt. Now, I have managed to get the sid version here working and hope the lusers here will be happier. Had to stand a lot of flames to get a small answer. :/ Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread exa
Excuse me, I had not read the latter amusing part of the mail. I'd just seen the reassign part. It looks like Branden makes another hopeless attempt at defamation of a bug reporter and fellow contributor with his underrated literary skills. On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:36:33AM -0500, Branden Robins

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread exa
om potato without disappointing users. Thanks, > Regards, > Steve Langasek > postmodern programmer :P goood luck with your postmodern codes. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-06 Thread exa
and it doesn't have the bug. I login as root from console, and I get all the sbin paths here. On borg, the bug occurs as you say, I login as root and I'm in like a normal user. I have to do a 'su' to get things right. What might be the reason for this? -- Eray (exa) Ozkur

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-07 Thread exa
tication for > display managers when you upgraded? Yes, but it certainly wasn't in the X > packages. ?? I'm not sure, but when I downgraded to the version in sid, everything got back to normal. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent Univers

Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-07 Thread exa
her has had it > deleted, and then (and only then) is login/whatever providing you with a > default user env... Thanks for the suggestion. That's it. Please close the bug. That file has somehow gone and replacing it will solve the problem. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent

Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-07 Thread exa
't smart to transmit cleartext passwords while the network is full of people snooping packets. Thanks for the idea, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-07 Thread exa
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 05:43:52PM +1000, Jason Henry Parker wrote: > Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Hmm. Well, I know about that. The display managers start all right. The > > problem occurs when I login. I'd tried xdm, wings and gdm. How com

Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-07 Thread exa
in "why have you submitted this bug?". It occured to me as a bug, and I wanted to report it as soon as I observed it. Sometimes the bugs I see turn out to be bogus surely, but I have reported many useful bugs as well. I invest a lot of time in testing stuff and reporting bugs. Thanks, -

Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-07 Thread exa
valid bugs I've reported I believe that improvements have been made. Testing is part of contribution. Could please one of you close this bug now? :> Best Regards, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-07 Thread exa
read every mail the BTS sends. I am sure your excelent bug analysis > skills are greatly appreciated. > Well, I guess I should. I have developed a great liking for bug reports somehow. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-07 Thread exa
Plus a lot of bug reports, etc. If the slow debian application process finalizes for me I'll be able to do a lot more. [waiting for DAM approval, whenever that is supposed to happen :(] Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: Singapore Linux Conference

2000-12-23 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Branden Robinson wrote: > > Wow, I may have to revise my opinion of France, then. Isn't France the same country that tried to spy on Netscape's SSL implementation? -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.c

Re: biweekly debian-installer status report

2000-12-23 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
w installer should provide the same functionality as FAI. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-24 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
ly: It should be re-usable as a library for implementing packages/modules for PLsĀ· That would make it pretty academic :) As a matter of fact I claimed to Anthony Towns that I'd rewrite dpkg for a test of skill during a friendly exchange. That's one of the features I really wan

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-24 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
dpkg's code in 3 years. That smells like "re-write". The scent of painstaking coding. Mmmm. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-24 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
be limited to files and directories. What I would want to see is a more abstract view of the process. In fact, one should view this as part of a software-engineering toolchain. It should play nicely with a corresponding build system, config system, etc. Off the top of my head of course. :) Thank

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-25 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
ll file gets fscked and the system stalls, then you gotta fix it by hand. Ah, and if a large portion of the database is gone, there is nothing your stupid hand can do, anyway. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections

2000-12-25 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
papers. Of course you can take a look at his work yourself. At this location there are many papers authored by him: http://www.ladseb.pd.cnr.it/infor/ontology/Papers/OntologyPapers.html Merry Christmas, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: What do you wish for in an package manager?

2000-12-25 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
ural" aspects of upgrading. No religious wars, all right? :) Cheers, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Oops

2000-12-25 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Mistakenly sent to debian-devel. This is off topic. Merry Xmas to you all!! Cheers, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-25 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Brian May wrote: > > - harder to administrate /etc/passwd as more users exist. I like using groups to give different sets of rights and I'm annoyed by Debian giving every user his own group. Is that reall necessary? cu, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, An

Re: Misclassification of packages; "libs" and "doc" sections

2000-12-25 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Anand Kumria wrote: > > In future please send those kinds of emails privately. mis-take. :) -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-25 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Nathan E Norman wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:43:53AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > > I like using groups to give different sets of rights and I'm > > annoyed by Debian giving every user his own group. Is that > > reall necessary? > > It&#x

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-25 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Brian May wrote: > > >>>>> "exa" == exa writes: > > exa> Brian May wrote: > >> - harder to administrate /etc/passwd as more users exist. > > exa> I like using groups to give different sets of rights and I'm >

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-26 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:43:53AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > > I like using groups to give different sets of rights and I'm > > annoyed by Debian giving every user his own group. Is that > > reall necessary? > > No, but it

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-26 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
gets processed for all shells, but is run > before zshrc. I use bash. Is this zsh better? :) Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
e, I need root access to do it :( ^^^ That's what troubles me. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#80343: general: Lack of policy on which files should be owned by which user

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
remote). > Ok. Then what I did was correct. I set up a developers group and put all devels there, then I changed umask to 002 in /etc/profile. I guess that's the way it works for multiple CVS users, right? Since there are per user groups, the umask won't disrupt any other operat

Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
ssions? Do you think everyone reporting a bug is a lamer? Revise your prejudice please. orion:exa$ groups exa dialout cdrom audio dip video windows I can do ANYTHING I WANT to those files okay? only in gmc renaming (that is the old mv) will fail > > But gmc thinks I don't have suf

Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
ip/ppa-bugvfatdefaults,user,exec,rw,noauto0 0 that happens to be data and gid 105 is windows !!! -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

(a small correction) Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
"Eray Ozkural (exa)" wrote: > > Try to reproduce what I do there. The permissions on parent > are irrelevant. That's a vfat filesystem. Permissions are > same everywhere anyway if you wonder. Sorry sorry sorry sorry. Permissions on parent of course do matter as you exp

Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-28 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Nathan E Norman wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 03:05:50AM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > > Martin. Yes. I tried. Do you think I'm a newbie or something? Why > > do you think the file is owned by root? It's on windows partition... > > Hold on ... this is

Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-28 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Chad Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 05:41:28PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > > BUT gmc (and most possibly mc) will not be > > able to rename stuff, though you can move > > files ;) It's a bug for certain! > > Whoa. I don't understand th

Re: Bug#80544: [rename] can't rename dir with valid permissions

2000-12-28 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Hi Martin, in the light of what has been discussed... could you please replicate the bug and report upstream? thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: RFC: pools and catagories of packages

2000-12-28 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
I'll deploy it for other interesting applications. (the most immediate is some kind of a bookmark /personal-data manager) Constructive comments most welcome. Criticism without reading any of the papers I'd linked to before on this list will not be tolerated!!! Thanks!! -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: RFC: pools and catagories of packages

2000-12-28 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
is *totally* irrelevant here. It's the semantics that matters. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

vacation

2000-12-28 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
I'll be off for a few days, so I may not be able to answer the posts in RFC: pools... thread. Happy New Year!! -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: RFC: pools and catagories of packages

2001-01-02 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
wo of the problems I'm trying to address. Another is the structure of ontology: a single inheritance tree doesn't seem to be sufficient. Plus, we need a part-of hierarchy as well I'm sure... -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: bugs + rant + constructive criticism (long)

2001-01-02 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Branden Robinson wrote: > > You know, kinda like the way I went nuclear on Wichert when he broke vim. You use vi? Emacs rules. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

[Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-03 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
to submit a patch. That's maintainer's responsibility. I've just reported what I had thought, some many many months ago, to be a problem. Of course, the maintainer has not done anything about this report for 7 months, and then he closes it like that. Not good. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Oz

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-03 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Peter Palfrader wrote: > > Did you do this first? No. I'm sending it here because I want it to be seen. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-03 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Wanted to make an ass of yourself in public, eh? Yep. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-03 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Ben Collins wrote: > > > WOW. Go fucking figure. YOUR BUG REPORT says > > PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_INITIALIZER_NP > > while this info page shows > > PTHREAD_ERRORCHECK_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_NP > argh. my first great mistake of the millenium. fuck me real

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-03 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
. Are all three types of mutexes supported under glibc? According to the info manual it should be but...? Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-03 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
strcmp then how will I rightfully complain about my bug not getting attention? Sorry Ben. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-03 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Ben Collins wrote: > > Oh, and just to chime in on this little bit, I did not start maintaining > glibc until Aug 31, 2000 (my first changelog entry). So no, I have not > been sitting on this for 7 months. Get your facts straight. I'm really ashamed, Ben. Sorry, sorry, sorry.

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-03 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Now it's my unavoidable duty to find out what has caused me to file this bug. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-03 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
ause the bug I reported was inaccurate, and all that. However, I would not have reported it if there was no problem. No bug should be closed without some investigation and communication by the maintainer. BTW, might bugzilla be better than Debian BTS in some aspects? Just a thought... Regards, -- E

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-04 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
important packages. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-04 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
appreciate the huge effort and many juicy changelog > entries that have gone into libc6 recently. I do, too. I appreciate Ben's skills and effort. Sorry if there's misunderstanding. For instance, there was this bug about fmemopen() and a few days later, the fix from CVS was in debian. A

Re: [Fwd: Bug#63511 acknowledged by developer(Bug#63511: fixed in glibc 2.2-7)]

2001-01-04 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
be the second developer for libc6 then start fixing some bugs! Ahem! *choke* Perhaps, I must start with the (inaccurate) bug I'd reported!! I'll just determine the cause of that bug and see what I can do myself. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, An

Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-06 Thread Eray &#x27;exa' Ozkural
Package: general Version: N/A; reported 2001-01-06 Severity: important After I upgraded from potato to woody on an i386 machine, I observed a strange sympton I login as root. It doesn't matter where, console, X or from network... When I check the environment, normal user environment is present. I

[authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread Eray &#x27;exa' Ozkural
I can summarize: from auth.log, a message like PAM_unix[...]: authentication failure; (uid=0) -> exa for gdm service exa is a normal user here, and gdm is the standard gdm. exa's uid is 1000 That's when I try to login from gdm. When I try to login from console the error is more

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
pioneer of the list. I upgraded our research cluster to unstable because I wanted to use it for testing the latest cluster software. If you call your insults to another contributor to debian "deserved rant", then I'd think you are either misinterpreting your status or unaware of any soc

Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
then #source ~/.bashrc #fi # set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists #if [ -d ~/bin ] ; then #PATH="echo `~/bin`:${PATH}" #fi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/environment LANG=C -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
-- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
this person is not that talented. And he is one of the most arrogant and irresponsible young computer-oriented persons I have ever encountered. His actions are simply not tolerable. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
stop reporting bugs > against general, and subscribe to a UNIX help mailing list. Why are you pretending that this is an FAQ. This happened twice on systems that I used, and was caused by an upgrade. I marked it important not because it is difficult to solve, but because it would apparently disrupt o

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
ealt with if bug reports were subject to peer review. I think that review by wider audience may be instrumental in that... - Thanks, [*] When we talk just about code, objectively, I wouldn't hesitate to post it to public places. -- Eray (exa) Ozku

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
s are the ones that I tries) to function correctly? Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 11:34:04PM +0200, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > > If you call your insults to another contributor to debian "deserved rant", > > then I'd think you are either misinterpreting your status or unaware of > > an

Re: How to report bugs (was glibc thing)

2001-01-07 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
e time. It's been a long time, but I hope I will be able to replicate the bug. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-07 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
ng at all to say on the subject. Yes, I did. At any rate, you didn't have to publicly insult me. -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Re: Bug#81397: [authorization] fails silently for normal users, cannot start server

2001-01-07 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
on if they don't have a cristal ball handy. When I have more time on my hands, the bug reports become more comprehensive. Excuse me for being paranoid about bug reports, but some of the bug reports are really being overlooked. Thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent Univers

Re: Bug#81396: root shell fscked after upgrade to woody

2001-01-07 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
tiation, while of course > non-SSL-capable telnet clients will still be able to connect insecurely. that sounds even better. perhaps ms is a good place to work at. :) thanks, -- Eray (exa) Ozkural Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

mozilla 0.7

2001-01-10 Thread Eray &#x27;exa' Ozkural
Hi Myth and all, I filed a bug report about the new mozilla 0.7 release. It looks like it's got PSM built in so it will comfort a lot of people. It would be highly appreciated if you could give it a whirl. Regards, __ Eray

ITP: cgen -- cpu tools generator

2001-04-27 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
be used in an unlimited fashion. Which is usual for a development tool. URL: http://sources.redhat.com/cgen/ -- Eray Ozkural (exa) Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo

Does BTS clean old bugs?

2001-05-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
On the bts web interface, it's written that closed bugs are cleaned up after a period of inactivity. Are they permanently erased? I'd prefer that a complete history of all bugs is preserved. Thanks, -- Eray Ozkural (exa) Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara e-mail: [EMAIL PROT

Re: Does BTS clean old bugs?

2001-05-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
Josip Rodin wrote: > > On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 03:00:56PM +0300, Eray Ozkural (exa) wrote: > > On the bts web interface, it's written that closed bugs are cleaned > > up after a period of inactivity. Are they permanently erased? > > I'd prefer that a complet

Re: Adopting these packages

2002-01-06 Thread Eray Ozkural \(exa\)
e contact me? Unfortunately I'm not available until February, but if you have any problems I'd try to help. Thanks, - -- Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent University, Ankara www: http://www.cs.bilkent.edu.tr/~erayo GPG public key fingerprint: 360C 852F