Adeodato Simó (01/03/2009):
> Hello,
o<,
> We have a number of FTBFSes that are blockers for the current set of
> transitions going forward. I've gone ahead and tagged them with
> user:debian-rele...@lists.debian.org and usertag:transition-blocker.
thanks for the heads-up.
> The list is here:
Adeodato Simó (04/03/2009):
> (pkg-multimedia-maintainers and pkg-phototools-devel Bcc'ed).
The latter Cc'd this time.
> 2. OpenEXR packages
> ===
>
> * openexr
> * ilmbase
>
> These two library packages I RFA'ed quite some time ago (#494877 and
> #494878), but the person w
Paul Wise (04/03/2009):
> Is ALSA supported by kFreeBSD or hurd or other unofficial ports?
Last time I checked, GNU/kFreeBSD provided with OSS, not with ALSA
(which is, as its name suggests, Linux-specific).
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Ben Finney (04/03/2009):
> * Invoke the appropriate VCS tool to export the specified revision
> from the VCS repository URL to a temporary directory.
>
> * Pack the temporary directory to an appropriately-named tarball in
> the current directory.
AFAICT, that doesn't ensure reproduci
Ben Finney (04/03/2009):
> How feasible is it to ensure reproducibility, though, when there is no
> canonical upstream release tarball?
Just saying that your get-orig-source stuff will not necessarily give
you the same tarball on different machines/setups/etc.
You want to look at pristine-tar to
Samuel Thibault (09/03/2009):
> which makes parallel not take a command, but executes commands from
> stdin. That can however be obtained by xargs sh -c. Another option
> that xargs misses is
>
>-j +NAdd N to the number of CPUs. Run this many jobs in parallel.
> For
(Wild guesses follow.)
Jay Berkenbilt (11/03/2009):
>* dh_installdocs: No longer add maintainer script code to call
> doc-base, as it supports triggers in stable.
>
> This version was uploaded on 3/7/2009.
>
> I can't really parse "as it supports triggers in stable." Who is "it"
> and
Fabian Greffrath (16/03/2009):
> Unfortunately IANADD, so I cannot modify the wiki page on my own.
Yes, you can!
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Goswin von Brederlow (17/03/2009):
> Aurelien Jarno writes:
> > I am interested in seeing the dpkg patch.
>
> The most current work should be on the multiarch alioth project. If
> you do work on something please add it there.
>
> http://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=310911
Jonas Meurer (21/03/2009):
> Joerg, please don't you see the consequences of your harsh discussion
> style?
You can cross out “discussion” here.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh (16/03/2009):
> So, ethtool really needs to grow an option to iterate over all
> netdevs, and another one to print a summary of link state and
> speed,duplex before mii-tool could be dropped.
I won't promise anything, but I'm interested in having a look, time
permittin
Mike O'Connor (25/03/2009):
> Yes, there have definately been times when packages are rejected from
> NEW that only got there becuase of a package addition. I'd say its
> common, even. If a package passes through new, then the maintainer
> uploads without really paying attention to what they ar
Mike O'Connor (25/03/2009):
> [...] we are having trouble keeping up with the NEW queue wihtout
> doing all of the source checks of packages not in the queue as you
> seem to be suggesting we should possibly be doing.
Actually, that's not what I meant to suggest. :) I've been wondering for
a whil
Luk Claes (25/03/2009):
> Michael Meskes wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:24:59PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >> And while the new package is kept out, the package currently in the
> >> archive might not be suitable at all. In
Vincent Fourmond (01/04/2009):
> Although I admit that schroot is a neat tool to deal with that, it is
> overkill in the case of wine, and much too complex for users that would
> be interested to use wine: one of the public that can be attracted to
> the GNU/Linux side of the game is gamers - es
Raphael Hertzog (06/04/2009):
> Except when you have multiple people listed you don't know who
> uploaded without resorting to who-uploads (or gpg check).
Not to mention cases where 5 people are listed there, and the package
got sponsored by even someone else (any idea how many NMs there were in
Romain Beauxis (06/04/2009):
> Couldn't this also be a line in the changelog ?
Like the trailer line, yes.
> This is not a standard but this is done in many cases:
>
> [ Romain Beauxis ]
> * Upload to $TARGET
Dunno about others, but I just see that as: this person chose to target
this or tha
William Pitcock (07/04/2009):
> Alternatively, we can just leave it and let it become another XMMS. I
> don't like this solution very much.
Beware, gtk3 is coming, so you'd better update lilo to no longer depend
on gtk2!
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
(Not sure if you need to To+Cc d...@…)
Michael Biebl (09/04/2009):
> Sorry for hijacking the thread, but what are the plans for bdb in
> squeeze, I'm counting 5 atm:
> libdb4.2
> libdb4.4
> libdb4.5
> libdb4.6
> libdb4.7
>
> Are there plans to reduce this?
I guess you're aware of the thread sta
Cyril Brulebois (04/03/2009):
> > 2. OpenEXR packages
> > ===
> >
> > * openexr
> > * ilmbase
> >
> > These two library packages I RFA'ed quite some time ago (#494877 and
> > #494878), but the person who expressed initia
Kurt Roeckx (04/03/2009):
> Argyll (#498396) might also be something you want in the
> pkg-phototools group?
Looks like Roland is very much more bzr-ish than git-ish. Thanks for
mentioning that package though.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Philipp Kern (14/04/2009):
> there are some news from the autobuilding front that may be of your
> interest:
o<
> State of the software packages used on the buildds
> ==
>
> This is part of the plan to unify those buildds to use one common set
> o
Neil Williams (14/04/2009):
> This is where the Draft TDeb Specification, created at the
> ftp-master/i18n meeting in Extremadura, will be developed and improved.
> Motivation
>
>1. Updates to translations should not require source NMU’s.
Any reason not to make that “sourceful uploads”?
Mra
[ Since you seem to like redundant stuff: GO AWAY WITH YOUR PRIVATE
REPLIES. GUESS WHAT, I READ THE LIST, OTHERWISE I WOULDN'T HAVE
ANSWERED. ]
Neil Williams (14/04/2009):
> > Any reason not to make that “sourceful uploads”?
>
> Well, the maintainer will be making the initial TDeb upload
> (
Neil Williams (14/04/2009):
> > > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep4/#index9h2
> >
> > You probably need to clarify in your DEP what “initial” means.
>
> This section covers part of that:
> http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep4/#index9h2
>
> "When the maintainer makes a new release, foo1.2.3-5, which in
Nick Leverton (19/04/2009):
> This is really an ITA for the existing unicorn and unicorn-source
> packages which were somewhat precipitately removed from Debian two
> weeks ago.
Well, I don't call that “precipitately”:
| Please remove unicorn:
| - mostly unused (2 in popcon for the binary package
Charles Plessy (21/04/2009):
> Source: libmqdb-perl
> Section: perl
> Priority: optional
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7)
> Build-Depends-Indep: libdbd-mysql-perl (>= 3.0005),
> libdbd-sqlite3-perl (>= 1.14), libdbi-perl (>= 1.51), perl (>= 5.6.0-12)
Charles Plessy (21/04/2009):
> > > libdbd-sqlite3-perl (>= 1.14), libdbi-perl (>= 1.51), perl (>= 5.6.0-12)
> > ^^
> > WTH?
>
> aqwa『~』$ zgrep -A1 -B1 '5.6.0-12' /usr/share/doc/dh-make-perl/changelog.gz
> * when module
Nick Leverton (22/04/2009):
> Thanks for your interest in my IT(re)P and your comments.
No problem.
> Of the stated reasons for removal:
>
> > | Please remove unicorn:
> > | - mostly unused (2 in popcon for the binary package unicorn)
>
> The unicorn binary package contains ancillary utils whi
Charles Plessy (22/04/2009):
> I try to refresh my control and rules files with latest versions of
> dh-make-perl when I upload new upstream releases. Be sure that this
> depenancy will be removed after the patches that you will send to the
> Policy and to dh-make-perl will be accepted.
Contacted
(No need to Cc me if you keep -devel in the loop.)
gregor herrmann (21/04/2009):
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:22:39 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > > > > libdbd-sqlite3-perl (>= 1.14), libdbi-perl (>= 1.51), p
Russ Allbery (22/04/2009):
> Yeah, absolutely. Could you file a bug against debian-policy so that I
> don't lose track of this before I get a chance to do it?
Sure. #525190 (-policy received the bugreport, dropping it; adding the
initial bugreport).
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Bradley Smith (23/04/2009):
> That's certainly some of them yes, but lintian only seems to check for
> files from earlier than 2004, however AVR32 was only added on
> 6/6/2006, so there are certainly considerably more than those.
Seems like a valid reason to request bumping the date check in lint
Ben Finney (24/04/2009):
> Think of it as “defense in depth”, ensuring that there is more than
> one barrier to undesirable elements.
Having to enable contrib/non-free and to pull stuff from there being of
course insufficient?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Mathieu Malaterre (24/04/2009):
> I am trying to understand some license issue I am having. Could
> someone let me know if the following is compatible with a debian
> package:
You usually want -legal@ for that.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bradley Smith (25/04/2009):
> In light of the recent outdated config.{sub,guess} discussion I have
> decided to generate a list[0] of packages that have these files from
> before June 2006, which is when the AVR32 architecture was added.
Speaking of which, where can one read more about that port?
Charles Plessy (26/04/2009):
> But since in the rejected package I had taken great care to include
> uuencoded sources of the PDF and explained this in REAME.source, can
> you confirm this was not acceptable for Debian and that shipping
> sources in the Debian diff is not enough?
JFWIW, I guess y
FIRST: GO AWAY WITH YOUR STUPID CC'S. I OBVIOUSLY READ THE LIST.
Noah Slater (26/04/2009):
> > JFWIW, I guess you want license-related stuff to go into
> > debian/copyright, rather than README.source.
>
> Actually, I would use debian/copyright for simply specifying licences,
> and debian/README.
Daniel Burrows (07/05/2009):
> As a practical matter, downgrading these dependencies will cause
> aptitude and other package managers to believe that the documentation
> is unnecessary and suggest removing it.
So that one has a chance to notice possibly unneeded doc? Works for me.
Mraw,
KiBi.
Peter Eisentraut (13/05/2009):
> The latter two approaches have obvious flaws, but it seems that no one is
> using
> the built-in dpkg approach. Is there anything wrong with it? Are people
> just
> not aware of it?
People might be using the following, which is slightly better than
listing e
Cyril Brulebois (13/05/2009):
> dpkg folks haven't been advocating their use, either.
Ah, Phil just mentioned what I had troubles remembering: the fact that
Build-Depends and Architecture can't be handled in a similar fashion.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
brian m. carlson (14/05/2009):
> I've worked on FTBFS-with-new-GCC bugs before, and realized only after
> putting significant work into the bug that the package didn't build on
> amd64, only on i386. Therefore, I think that the package should have
> a proper list of archs that prevents this probl
Russ Allbery (15/05/2009):
> Calling dpkg-buildpackage -S produces a superfluous _sources.changes
> file, so anything that uses that method to produce a source package
> for build would either need to remove it or would leave it lying
> around. pdebuild uses dpkg-buildpackage -S to generate a sou
Russ Allbery (15/05/2009):
> So, y'all realize that pdebuild --buildresult .. by default breaks the
> *_source.changes file that it generates because it regenerates a
> source package as part of the regular build, right? How are you
> actually using that *_source.changes file? Always having pdeb
Xavier MAILLARD (07/06/2009):
> The package was already in Debian till 2006 then it got dropped (no
> reason given).
You could look at:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/records.html
Removed 1.4.9-4.1 from unstable →
http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/records/news/20081204T190628Z.html
# 507598 →
ht
Aaron M. Ucko (21/06/2009):
> [Copying the original poster because I'm not certain he's subscribed;
> apologies for any resulting duplication.]
[AFAICT, he is, since he replied in some threads previously. ;)]
> I agree that this message is not as clear as it could be. In
> practice, I believe th
Shaun Jackman (21/06/2009):
> I have a source package with two binary packages. One binary package
> is arch i386 amd64, the other is arch all containing the
> architecture-independent data files. The resulting dsc file is
> Architecture: amd64 i386 all
> which lintan complains about:
> E: eagle s
Mathieu Malaterre (22/06/2009):
> Sorry this might be dumb, but I cannot get the *.commands to be signed
> as expected:
Use dcut.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Guus Sliepen (24/06/2009):
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:17:14AM -0400, Bryan Donlan wrote:
>
> > Is libposix complete enough to link against for real programs yet? If
> > not, why should it be included at this time?
>
> I agree that if the only thing that works at this moment is the simplest
>
Stefano Zacchiroli (25/06/2009):
> Still, as a DD, I would like to explicitly switch to dash to help in
> spotting possible problems. Can you please consider document how to
> switch? I guess switching the symlink is enough, but an entry in
> README.Debian saying explicitly so (and possibly docume
Lucas Nussbaum (25/06/2009):
> On 25/06/09 at 10:32 +0200, Harald Braumann wrote:
> > Checkbashisms is a lintian check, right?
>
> No, it's in devscripts.
Yes, it is also a lintian check. Although not as complete, see lintian's
check/scripts file.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Philipp Kern (26/06/2009):
> On 2009-06-25, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> > European ID cards are more like a passport, whereas a US ID is a
> > driver license. (In addition to that national driver licenses of
> > european countries are much less usefull for this purpose unless
> > they are the new e
Frank Küster (26/06/2009):
> In this case, I'd tend to say that there is actually a bug: Move the
> documentation that explains why the behavior is intended to a more
> prominent, visible place.
OK, and once that done, what do you do when the bugs keep on being
opened because people don't read th
mli...@stacktrace.us (26/06/2009):
> While installing mysql-server I noticed the following dependencies:
>
> "bsd-mailx exim4 exim4-base exim4-config exim4-daemon-light"
>
> Although it's not that big of a deal, it does raise the question "Why
> should a database server require a MTA?"
-(cy...@ta
Thorsten Glaser (2014-07-13):
> Cyril Brulebois dixit:
>
> >Thorsten Glaser (2014-07-12):
>
> >> OK, can you please give-back makefs on mips once the new bmake
> >> binaries are available for all buildds?
> >
> >Please send your request to the appro
Joachim Breitner (2014-07-13):
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, den 13.07.2014, 13:02 +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > > Maybe a “gift” job for a Debian Contributor would be to put together
> > > a “DD’s cheat card”, with infos about how to contact DSA, WB team,
> > >
Hi Riku, Holger,
Holger Levsen (2014-07-16):
> On Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2014, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > This a side-effect from Debian's policy that discourages fixing bugs in
> > other maintainers packages via NMUs. Somehow, it is felt better to
> > remove packages from testing than possibly offending
Ansgar Burchardt (2014-08-01):
> as a first step towards source-only uploads, the archive will now accept
> source-only uploads provided the following conditions are met:
>
> * The source package is not NEW and does not build NEW binaries.
> * Architecture-independent (arch:all) packages must b
Anton Zinoviev (2014-08-07):
> Hi!
>
> I have two bugs reported against console-setup about keybord not working
> properly under X Window. In both cases I have asked the reportes to
> provide the file /etc/default/keyboard and in both cases the file was
> correct. Therefore, the bugs are not
Hi dd@.
(M-F-T was set so respecting it; but adding -boot@ anyway.)
Jordi Mallach (2014-08-07):
> It's been around 9 months since tasksel changed (for real) the default
> desktop for new installs. At the time of the change, it was mentioned
> the issue would be revisited before the freeze, aroun
Theodore Ts'o (2014-08-08):
>
> Potentially stupid question --- why are the gcc-4.[789]-base packages
> have the priority required? And what are they used for?
>
> I'm fine-tuning a small kvm appliance (kvm-xfstests, as it happens), and
> I'm trying to keep the root file system as small as poss
Russ Allbery (2014-08-08):
> Cyril Brulebois writes:
>
> > I'd therefore contact the relevant maintainers to make sure, probably
> > through a bug report asking for a priority downgrade.
>
> It looks like the only remaining purpose for gcc-4.9-base is to cre
Charlie Brown (2014-08-09):
> Hi,
> I'm using Sid(Unstable). I tried to install fglrx-driver, and failed.
> It seems that fglrx-driver requires xorg-video-abi-15 or below, but
> xserver-xorg-core(1.16.0) in Sid doesn't provide any of them. A search
> in aptitude shows that it provides xorg-video-a
Hi Josselin,
here's my take as d-i release guy. That's basically in line with
Christian's except for the last answer.
I'm also putting -boot@ in Cc so that other d-i members can voice their
opinions. Full mail can be found at:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/08/msg00432.html
Jossel
Hi Russ,
Russ Allbery (2014-08-16):
> None of this is why libav and FFmpeg can't both be in the archive.
> They can't both be in the archive because both the release team and
> the security team have said that they're not interested in trying to
> support both, due to the amount of work involved.
Ansgar Burchardt (2014-08-17):
> incoming.debian.org is used to publish recently uploaded source and
> binary packages before they reach the mirror network of the main
> archive. Until now, however, with the exception of the buildd network,
> it has not been possible to verify the integrity of the
Marc Haber (2014-08-18):
> And others removed. Or do you actually claims that the systemd
> migration didn't actually break things? Not all of them, but a
> noticeable number.
(I don't think Russ claimed anything along those lines, no.)
Anyway: things get broken, bugs get reported, bugs get fixe
Sven Bartscher (2014-08-19):
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:49:42 -0600
> Ryan Burchett wrote:
>
> > Hello! My apologies if this is the wrong email to contact for my issue.
>
> debian-u...@lists.debian.org would have been better.
>
> > I would absolutely love to use Debian. I cannot do this however.
Brian May (2014-08-21):
> Can somebody please tell me why python-openssl and python3-openssl isn't
> available in sid?
[…]
> It appears that the packages produced have changed to architecture
> dependant packages, seriously wondering if maybe this got DAK confused.
>
>
> (this problem is prevent
Hi,
Diogene Laerce (2014-08-22):
> Is it possible to automatize the installation process of Debian ? I
> mean being able to install without user intervention ?
sure: https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/apb
But please get in touch with a user support list next time, like
debian-user@ or
Svante Signell (2014-08-29):
> I'm about to install Debian Jessie/testing on a brand new (powerful)
> computer and don't want to have systemd running as PID 1. Is the only
> way to do that now is to install with the installer, getting
> systemd-sysv as PID 1, and later install sysvinit-core, syste
Thomas Goirand (2014-09-07):
> During Debconf14, I could chat with Joey about the future of Tasksel,
> and having a "More option" task, which would lead to a new screen which
> would propose more tasks.
>
> Before anyone can implement this plan, we have to make sure that we all
> agree on what ki
Steve McIntyre (2014-09-08):
> This is (almost) exactly what's being worked on after discussions at
> DebConf. By removing some of the less useful tasks, we'll be able to
> add some extra more useful options.
At some point it would really be nice to have a summary of what happened
or what was dis
David Weinehall (2014-09-30):
> The latest upload of xbmc seems a bit botched; this is the
> changelog in its entirety:
>
>
> xbmc (2:13.2+dfsg1-2~exp0) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
> .
>*
>
> Now, there is nothing wrong with terse and succinct changelogs,
> but I'd say this is a bit *too*
Thorsten Glaser (2014-10-07):
> Yeah, but Md is an arsehole anyway and requires printf to be
> a /bin/sh builtin instead of just adding /usr/bin to $PATH,
> especially now that the initrd mounts /usr already anyway,
> and CTTE decided to rather offend me than Md because he is
> maintainer of the m
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Tille (2014-10-08):
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 09:11:24PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the second beta
> > release of the installer for Debian 8 "Jessie".
> > ...
>
> thanks for yo
Hi again Andreas,
Andreas Tille (2014-10-14):
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 06:02:11AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > well to be honest the whole blend story came as a surprise.
>
> Ahhh, this in turn is surprising for me since the first "version" of
> this bug i
Thorsten Glaser (2014-10-15):
> Who are powerpc buildd admins, again?
Still listed at the same location since last time you asked:
https://www.debian.org/intro/organization
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/07/msg00446.html
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Scott Kitterman (2014-10-29):
> Would another option be to use "built-using" the doxygen version in
> question. Since effectively this is embedded code from the doxygen
> package if I understand it correctly. Using doxygen to regenerate
> things is the preferred form of modification and all the
Simon Richter (2014-11-06):
> I've run into a bit of a problem building a root filesystem for an ARM
> system where the kernel shipped by the vendor is 2.6 based. As systemd
> does not work there, I tried installing a sysvinit based system using
> --include and --exclude to (c)debootstrap.
>
> In
Jonas Smedegaard (2014-11-10):
> If we had the *option* of init system choice at install time (even if
> completely hidden from default UI only activated by a commandline
> option), I believe that would radically limit complaints.
We already have, Simon mentioned one way to do it.
You can also
Rebecca N. Palmer (2014-11-11):
> It has been recently stated [0-1] that backports is enabled by
> default in Jessie.
Yes, and that's a bug. See #764982.
> 1. Does that mean that if pkgX is in jessie-backports but not
> jessie, "apt-get install pkgX" will install it from -backports?
Yes. And th
Scott Kitterman (2014-11-11):
> As long as apt prefers a version from stable over a version from
> backports when both are available (unless instructed to install from
> backports) why is this a problem?
>
> It seems more user friendly to me for a package that's been
> specifically ask for to en
Adding said list to Cc…
Svante Signell (13/04/2012):
> Are the Debian Maintainers for Enlightenment packages active? There has
> not been any packaging updates since 2011-04-25 (almost a year) while
> upstream has made several releases since then.
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/e17.html giv
Svante Signell (14/04/2012):
> As the title says, are there plans to use eglibc 2.14 for wheezy??
> It has been out for some time now.
Again, ask the maintainers. Not dd@.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Holger Levsen (02/05/2012):
> *grin*
>
> btw, is the concept of numbers smaller than zero but not negative known/used
> anywhere outside of debian/dpkg?
Something like that?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signed_zero
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Jonathan Wiltshire (16/05/2012):
> Viral? I hope this is just a translation artefact; can you explain
> exactly what you mean by it?
Quite a shock for a project advertised as licensed under the BSD!
(INSTALL.txt says GPLv2 though.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Daniel Leidert (18/05/2012):
> Our bug tracker contains items for packages, which do (not longer)
> exist. What should happen to them? I see, that it might be a good idea
> to keep them for the case, a package is re-introduced. But this might
> happen only for a few packages. Most of them got remo
Xueqian (19/05/2012):
> Package: general
> Severity: important
>
> Recently, I have upgrade packages xorg, xserver-xorg,
> xserver-xorg-input-all and x11-common from 7.6+12 to 7.6+13.
See “Follow-up with more info” on:
http://x.debian.net/howto/report-bugs.html
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
De
Alain SAURAT (19/05/2012):
> This package is only avaible for squeeze and sid, is it normal ?
Yes, see:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/php-suhosin/news/20120320T163911Z.html
> I have dist-upgrade my server from squeeze to wheezy and my php
> won't run and send a lot of mail via cron to me.
B
Andrey Rahmatullin (22/05/2012):
> > Seeing the trouble broonie has with zlib, why are those
> > packages still built anyway? Can’t they please go away?
> What are you talking about?
Probably that:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/z/zlib.html
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/z/zli
Mark Brown (28/05/2012):
> Ask the s390x folks, they asked for them. Though what on earth inspired
> them to name the new architecture such that the old architecture name is
> a substring of the new name is beyond me... As far as I can tell nobody
> is really using the biarch packages on most ar
Jonas Smedegaard (31/05/2012):
> I have heard before the argument of the sponsor having responsibility,
> but in reality I have *never* heard of sponsors actually being held
> responsible for anything but the concrete upload of a specific
> packaging release.
Suggested reading:
http://bugs.debi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Cyril Brulebois
* Package name: xserver-xorg-video-modesetting
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Tungsten Graphics, Dave Airlie, Red Hat…
* URL :
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-modesetting/
* License
Thomas Goirand (14/06/2012):
> 1/ […] 2/ […]
> 3/ How to achieve it
> |=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> |To acheive this, we would need something like this:
>
> ||Vcs-Git-Debian-Branch-Name: debian/unstable
> ||Vcs-Git: |git://anonscm.debian.org/openstack/nova.git
> |||Vcs-Git-Upstream-Branch-Name: master
> |V
Michael Gilbert (14/06/2012):
> package (version) sid; urgency=low
>
> * Binary-only non-maintainer upload; no source changes.
>
> -- Debian Release Team Tue, 05 Jun
> 2012 16:33:05 +
>
> or some other appropriate binnmu mailing address. This would also
> mean rebuilding all of the ot
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (14/06/2012):
> I have uploaded libavg_1.7.1-1 into delayed/7 queue. After that it
> will hit new, as it was previously removed.
Why the seven days delay? It looks to me like you could/should skip
that. (dcut has “reschedule” for that.)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: D
Ansgar Burchardt (07/07/2012):
> Another question is if the release team would consider unblocking
> updated packages (with just the switch to xz for binaries). I think
> it would be nice to be able to get a useful desktop system using just
> the first CD, but I'm not sure if they would make an e
Wouter Verhelst (08/07/2012):
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 01:17:32AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > Even grub-legacy?
>
> Yes; d-i in expert mode still has the ability to explicitly choose for
> grub legacy, if you really want to.
It looks to me like a current debian-installer build installs grub
Noel David Torres Taño (11/07/2012):
> > Your view is irrelevant here: GNOME project considers it essential.
>
> Gnome view is the one irrelevant. This is Debian GNU/Linux, not Gnome
> GNU/Linux. We need to care for our users (both proficient and novice [1]),
> not for Gnome developers desires. A
301 - 400 of 707 matches
Mail list logo
