To debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org:
Stable offshore resources:
- Direct Mailing Dedicated Server
- Offshore web Hosting
- Supply email list according to your order
Rudy
Server Dept
Do not reply to this email. Please contact us by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ve revived, lead by the Fedora
folks. Please do check out the new thread, especially if you have opinions
about what /usr/bin/python should do once Python 2.7 is EOL.
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/linux-sig/2017-August/thread.html
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
ou old timers
that I used to work with might be willing to sign my new key and/or
would be looking for possible keysigning in Philadelphia, PA area or
maybe even New Haven, CT area.
Thanks for any guidance/help!
Barry deFreese
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 09:38 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> On 14.07.24 02:28, Barry deFreese wrote:
> > OK, don't beat me up too bad, even though I deserve it. I've been
> > away
> > a LONG time and did not retire properly nor update my key and my
> >
Universe is winning." Rich Cook.
Barry deFreese (aka bddebian)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
y and well I just
couldn't believe it. It is now far easier to install Debian than
Windows XP - yes - really. And I'm not a regular Linux user.
Congrtaulations.
God bless,
Barry
-- From Barry Drake (The Revd) minister of the Netherfield United Reformed
church, Nott
7;s java vm would be an example
of what is not permitted.
--
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
Registered Linux User #368650
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Trading alert!
Just do yourself a favor and watch A B S Y tomorrow morning, and
don't say we didn't tell you...
Talk about flying under the radar? Isn't that what we look for?
Trade Date : Monday, June 7th, 2006
Company Name : AbsoluteSKY
Ticker : A B S Y
Price : $0.95
8month Target : $1 -
Hello,
Приходите к нам, здесь вы сможете не просто выучить язык но и
отлично пообщаться.
Сегодня со скидками!!!
Телефоны в Москве:
105-5186
два-три-восемь-три-три-восемь-шесть
Kopmels Lehnert
Williams Chan Bamforth
Gurchenko Cherfas Henson Canbaz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
:
what shall I do about that?
greetings,
jonas
What version of lintian do you have? That should be fixed by now.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
urd5 to nurd6 if it was still there or no?
If I have done something wrong, please feel free to notify me and let me
know but I don't think it helps us any to just say "here we go again".
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.
Checking something extensively is much easier if there
is one canonical branch which everybody agrees on.
Sounds like Utopia but I can't see it happening.
Regards,
Martin
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
any reverse dependencies except for the
Python ones, so I think we’d be better off removing them ASAP.
If you are fine with it, I’ll do a MBF.
Cheers,
Joss,
I was getting ready to file all of these so a +1 from me.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel
.
There has also been some similar discussions in Ubuntu with some users
reporting that some web sites and packages don't work with openjdk but I
have not seen a lot of concrete proof.
My personal feeling is that we either need to remove it or fix it up.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Barry deF
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 11:44:21AM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
There has also been some similar discussions in Ubuntu with some
users reporting that some web sites and packages don't work with
openjdk but I have not seen a lot of concrete proof.
I might
34 outstanding security issues? :)
OK, I guess it stays but it would be nice to get it fixed up.
Thanks for all the input.
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
have bugs and a very low popcon.
Does anyone have any objections before I remove them?
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
bugs and/or
> remove them from the archive.
I like that plan!
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
point me to a wiki page that has a correct way to adopt a package
> such as soundjuicer.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Andreas Marschke.
>
>
Andreas,
Where did you see that it was up for adoption? It's not listed as Orphaned or
RFA'd? In fact it just had an upload on 10/31
especially appreciate some feedback from any kfreeBSD folks as I
re-applied the patch for the joystick stuff but had to re-factor it a little.
Thanks!
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Glibc Packaging Team,
Hi Pierre,
I got 2.5 to build with TLS but we need some changes to Hurd and gnumach
to handle it. As I understand it we have even more issues with 2.6.
Of course I'm certainly not the expert on the issue..
Thanks,
Barry deFreese (aka bddebian)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
.
- Upload them to unstable.
For the moment I did one upload to experimental, but I am not convinced
by my own choice. If somebody has wise comments, I will be grateful to
listen them.
Have a nice day,
Just help get ctsim to build with wx2.8 so we can drop 2.4. ;-)
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
kages should be removed as soon as they don’t have
remaining rdeps
I will look at this as well since I'm on an RM:/proposed RM kick. I
assume this is more of a Lenny+1 goal?
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Barry deFreese wrote:
OK, I have looked at several of these and man what a mess.
Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gnome-libs
Orphaned but obviously tons of r(b)depends.
gtkfontsel
Orphaned but a fairly significant popcon. I can't find new upstream
source. Could probabl
Raphael Geissert wrote:
Barry deFreese wrote:
[...]
stegdetect
RM: filed.
Why isn't just the xsetg package dropped? stegdetect is a CLI app; only xsteg
uses GTK+
Cheers,
/me who has stegdetect installed and keeps it around to time by time try to find
something that
pends
while libnet1 exists. Who's taking care of those users? Should we keep
every version of glibc in the archive? How about all the gnome1 stuff?
BTW, I don't care if GTK+ 1.2 stays or goes but I do care about
unmaintained stuff hanging around.
Just my worthless $.02 :)
Barry d
Michael Banck wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:20:31AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
So I am not advocating keeping every bit of software around.
If we keep every version of every library out there how do we support
it?
Morten did not say that
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On 06/12/2008, at 15.47, Barry deFreese wrote:
Obviously I was exaggerating purposely.
Yes, but, you know, exaggerating the position of others in a forum
like this is not really constructive. In fact, it signals that you've
run out of arguments.
Give me a
a [1]. The modified package is on mentors and I am
looking for
a sponsor [2] (nudge nudge :-))
Morten,
Maybe I've already offended you but I already offered to sponsor your
gtkglarea upload, I just had a question on the soname mismatch that I
asked about on -mentors.
Thanks,
Barry d
Neil Williams wrote:
Barry - PLEASE do not continue with the request for sponsorship of
gtkglarea.
Neil,
My apologies but I just uploaded it. It still has a few r(b)depends:
rdepends:
xt
worlded
vertex
python-visual
rbdepends:
celestia
vertex
xt
Sorry,
Barry deFreese
--
To
porting
and/or uploads of new upstream where possible. I'd personally love to
see it go but I'm just one lowly new DD in a sea of people with much
more skills than I. :)
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
and NMUs for a couple of them. I will keep updating these notes if I
get anywhere.
If any of you maintain any of these packages and have any
thoughts/suggestions/etc, please feel free to contact me.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
shell.
Cheers,
Looks like snes9express is supposed to be another front-end that is
gtk2.0 but it has never been part of a stable release.
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ew upstream available. I've pinged the ITAer to
see if the new upstream is GTK 2.0.
sqlrelay
Some of the binaries have decent popcons. We could probably either
port sqlrelay-config-gtk or just remove that binary for now.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
://wiki.debian.org/OngoingTransitions
This is the one that Barry added:
http://wiki.debian.org/Transitions
Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did. I didn't see the other one when I
was poking around wiki.d.o today though. Which one should we actually use?
Sorry,
Barry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did.
Ah, woops.
Which one should we actually use?
OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too).
BTW, found this page too:
http://wiki.debian.or
fail for Debian?
They get paid? In my experience this helps a lot to be nicer to stupid
people.
No, MOTUs are held to the same CoC and are definetly NOT paid.
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
Paul Wise wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:55 AM, Barry deFreese wrote:
Shoot, I didn't add that, Moritz did.
Ah, woops.
Which one should we actually use?
OngoingTransitions IMO (perhaps it could be renamed too).
BTW, found this page too:
http://wiki.debian.or
. But I did have "Just a suggests, can
probably be removed." in there.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
at gnome-libs removal was suggested (and bugs
filed) over a year ago, does it make sense to remove gnome-libs before
Lenny releases?
For more details, I have been trying to keep the wiki page up to date:
http://wiki.debian.org/Gtk1.2ImlibGnome1Removals
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Tim Dijkstra wrote:
Barry deFreese schreef:
Hi folks,
There are only 5 packages left that have reverse depends on gnome-libs
packages. They are as follows:
digitaldj: Removal request was filed but maintainer claims someone has
done a Gtk2 port and saved it for now.
I thought this
se of
you that wish it to survive, want to take over maintenance of the
package? If not, I will likely be requesting removal. It is currently
not in testing.
Thank you,
Barry deFreese
Debian QA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
or
exactly a master but I'm happy to help if you want it.
Thanks,
Barry deFreese (aka bddebian)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
* Package name: python-flufl.enum
Version : 3.0.1
Upstream Author : Barry Warsaw
* URL : http://launchpad.net/flufl.enum
* License : LGPLv3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
* Package name: python-flufl.i18n
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Barry Warsaw
* URL : https://launchpad.net/flufl.i18n
* License : LGPLv3
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A high level API
Woohoo, congrats Torsten.
Again, I must apologize for my extended absence, work and personal life are
just insane right now.
I hope it slows down in the winter and I will resume full duties. :(
Thanks,
Barry
On 9/17/2010 11:52 AM, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Heyho,
>
> as you may have re
ing or some other form of notification that you were working on
it would have helped.
Sorry,
Barry deFreese
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
).
I was considering packaging up the new upstream but I would have to
register to do that and I am not really keen on putting that much effort
into a non-free package.
Anyone have an opinion?
Thanks,
Barry deFreese
P.S. Apologies for the cross-post but since arb is a Debian Med
Packaging
Daniel Baumann wrote:
Barry deFreese wrote:
I was considering packaging up the new upstream but I would have to
register to do that
not true: ftp://ftp.ics.com/openmotif/
Anyone have an opinion?
it's still on my todo list. if i'll not get arround to do it over t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-persistent
Version : 4.0.8
Upstream Author : Zope Foundation and Contributors
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/persistent/4.0.8
* License
dividual developer rather than of the "package"?
Especially for team maintained packages, if you and I are on a team, you might
not want it to apply patches but I might.
I suppose in those cases though, teams (or even co-maintainers) can establish
conventions, although it would be nice in that case to also have a
--no-skip-patches option.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
he two git-based package development regimes is
"better" or "more popular"?
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
git and Debian, but I think it
makes a lot of sense not to assume what 'master' might point to, but instead
be explicit about the series name in the branch name. If it's possible to
make a shorthand alias for the most common branch (unstable?) then that's fine
too.
Cheers
it makes me somewhat uncomfortable to assume that a git tag in the
upstream repo will always be equivalent to their released tarball. In fact,
it's often not, as is the case with Python packages containing a MANIFEST.in.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ou
do all your cutting edge development, and there isn't usually a clear
alternative naming scheme (e.g. code names). 'trunk' might be better anyway.
But in Debian's case, all packaging work is targeted to a series, so it makes
more sense to make that evident in the branch name
d sense to have that.
(I'm not arguing against using an upstream git tag when it *does* all work
nice and smoothly, just saying you can't count on it, and should force our
workflows onto upstreams'.)
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: lazr.smtptest
Version : 2.0.1
Upstream Author : lazr-us...@lists.launchpad.net
* URL : https://launchpad.net/lazr.smtptest
* License : LGPL
ndwaving
>etc. about this kind of thing there.
I'm hoping there will be discussions regarding vcs at Debconf (I will be
there), especially among the DPMT for planning on a transition from svn to
git.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: lazr.config
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : lazr-develop...@lists.launchpad.net
* URL : http://launchpad.net/lazr.config
* License : LGPLv3
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: lazr.delegates
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : lazr-develop...@lists.launchpad.net
* URL : http://launchpad.net/lazr.delegates
* License
me, regardless of whether you used gbp, git-dpm, or plain vanilla
git + quilt. One example of a superficial differences is the tag names used
by default. They're different between the two helpers, but really needn't be.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ano's summary of the DC14 conversations:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2014/08/msg00159.html
There are other threads in the archives, so please do read up on our
discussions to date, and come over to the debian-python list to give us your
suggestions and feedback.
Cheers,
-Barry
On Sep 12, 2014, at 07:18 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>I'm looking forward for systemd-mta.
It's inevitable. ;)
http://catb.org/jargon/html/Z/Zawinskis-Law.html
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Oct 22, 2014, at 03:02 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
>debsnap, in devscripts.
>gbp-import-dscs --debsnap, in git-buildpackage
I've also been working on this script (with help from tumbleweed) for
similarly importing history using debsnap into git-dpm:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/
On Oct 29, 2014, at 01:47 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
>I got the impression that sbuild is winning over pbuilder BICBW.
Especially now that bug #607228 has been fixed!
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
if you don't anticipate importing an other
upstream branches.
Again thanks. After Jessie is released, I hope to restart this discussion
over in Debian Python, for that team's transition to git.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e we recommend "upstream/latest" by default but allow "upstream"
>alone in the case when there are no other upstream branches tracked ?
+1
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
was once a necessity (with CVS/SVN). Not so with git.
+1. On Ubuntu, we had sourceful branches with UDD (bzr-based Ubuntu
Distributed Development). It always seemed more awkward to use debian-only
branches in debian-python svn branches. Playing with sourceful e.g. git-dpm
is a joy.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
redates Python 3 by
many years.
Please do create the python3- version of the package. This page may provide
some helpful guidelines on how to do this:
http://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide
I also hang out on #debian-python and am willing to help and/or answer
questions.
Cheers,
-Barry
ycon 2012 that we should just have a revolving
set of names for the regular expression module rewrites in Python:
+- regex -> re -> sre -> -+
^ |
|-+
rinse-and-repeat-ly y'rs,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
in pursuing this further, I suggest contacting Colin
Watson, who I think did most of the development to make this possible.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ther so packages can more easily cross the chasm.
Anyway, I've rambled enough. My intent wasn't to offend either community, but
just to say that Debian and Ubuntu work best when they appeal to their
strengths, but always strive for collaboration. And maybe there's opportunity
to
an
SDL team which
ideally would be packaging it. Have they been contacted?
I am actually a member of that team but admittedly have not been keeping up
with it unfortunately. :(
Thanks,
- --
Barry deFreese
Sometimes helper, sometimes hinderer to:
Debian Gam
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-enum34
Version : 0.9
Upstream Author : Ethan Furman
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/enum34
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: python-pytest-instafail
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Janne Vanhala
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pytest-instafail
* License : BSD
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: restish
Version : 0.12.1
Upstream Author : Matt Goodall
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/restish
* License : BSD
Programming Lang
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Block
* Package name: pyper
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Barry Block
* URL : https://github.com/bblock/Pyper
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C#
Description : Easily transform text into other forms
uilt
interaction right, especially when doing merges. Another important lesson is
to be sure that when committing a branch (say for a merge proposal), you do it
at the same quilt push "level" as the original branch.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
nue "to own the
copyright in the contribution, with full rights to re-use, re-distribute, and
continue modifying the contributed code", but it allows Canonical to use your
contribution in certain ways. Read the above link and the linked FAQ for
details.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
accurate about exactly the deal
that you agree to in order to contribute to upstart.
Cheers,
-Barry
[*] or have their employers make up their minds for them. ;)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: flufl.password
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Barry Warsaw
* URL : http://launchpad.net/flufl.password
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang
managed to make quilt work mostly
non-painfully.
I accept that others have different, completely valid opinions on the matter.
-Barry
[*] which is actually more likely with Debian branches than Ubuntu branches
because Ubuntu developers will almost never push to debianlp: branches.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
It's certainly
not *required*, but often works out pretty nicely.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
b, etc.
I also think allowing source-only uploads makes for easier contributions, and
thus hopefully *more* contributions.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ests have been run
during the local build process? I think it's a good thing to enable more
packages tests (e.g. through dh_auto_tests or DEP 8 tests), so ensuring that
DEP 8 tests for example are always run before the package is published is,
IMO a good thing.
Cheers,
-Barry
signatu
ndards[1]. ;)
(Yes, that is a sarcastic joke! and of course I'm +1 on Arno's sentiment.)
-Barry
[1] http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2369.html
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ws, which is why Mailman
supports either (we generally support the relevant RFCs but leave policy
decisions to list owners).
If you really want to understand both sides of the argument:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e contributor agreements for core
developers, and this is not an uncommon requirement.
We can argue about specific contribution legal documents and policies
(although hopefully, not here ;) but not about whether they are a reality in
today's FLOSS world.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
r this refusal, I
can respect that even while I might try to convince them their concerns are
misplaced.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ularly onerous
to me, nor should they (IMHO) be an impediment to participating in such
projects.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
d hasn't gotten nearly the same real-world exposure yet, I'm convinced
that it will be easier for end-users to manipulate than either Python or XML
syntax.
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Dec 04, 2012, at 02:29 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>It's currently tied to Python 2.7 (but not to a very high degree, it's
>totally backportable).
Mmm, Python 2. Would the authors be open to a Python 3 port? :)
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
an benefit from it. My patch has less
value as a patch that someone has to apply independently and rebuild.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
been on the other end of it in past jobs, where
Legal is no fun at all to interact with.
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e open:
https://github.com/paramiko/paramiko/issues/16
Cheers,
-Barry
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ouch
>anything dpkg is supposed to be managing.
>
>It's useful for installing crap from PyPI in a more or less standard,
>distro-agnostic manner.
This arrangement works pretty well for me in practice, especially since
`virtualenv --system-site-packages` can usually give y
with
distros, Linux-based or otherwise. I thought we'd made a lot of good
progress, but some of the drivers moved on to other things. I'm hoping Nick
Coghlan's efforts at Pycon 2013 can help motivate a revival of this work[1].
Cheers,
-Barry
[1]
https://us.pycon.org/2013/community/openspaces/packaginganddistributionminisummit/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Okay, fortunately, no bands are practicing tonight and no kids need homework
help, so let's see if I can answer some of these questions. :)
On Feb 07, 2013, at 08:54 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>> Speaking with many hats on, I th
is released.
--
Barry Fishman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/m3d2tmgq9x.fsf@barry_fishman.acm.org
On 2013-04-22 19:40:01 EDT, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 18:21 -0400, Barry Fishman wrote:
>> Is anyone else seeing a boot hangup on wheezy with the linux/3.2.41-2 kernel
>> on systems with multiple display controllers?
>>
>> I filed the bug report o
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
