Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:50:08PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Helen Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I think that is the main issue here. I would like to believe that > > Debian is capable of showing more respect for other people than > > including hotbabe in the distribution would indi

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activitymonitor

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:46:16PM -0500, William Ballard wrote: > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 01:25:36AM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > The Christian Bible ought to be OK by most Islamic scholars - it's the > > Crusader history that has caused most of the problems - but you

Re: Questionable image process. Was: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- (abusive?) erotic images in Debian

On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 04:31:03PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: > David Weinehall wrote: > > > >You *really* need to have a look at the pictures. All of your > >argumentation below about pron neatly goes *wooosh*. > > > I'll take your word. However, we seem to be lacking some process here. I > don'

Re: Questionable image process. Was: Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- (abusive?) erotic images in Debian

On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 05:15:50PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: > Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > >You're looking at this from a US-centric viewpoint, Bruce, and extending > >this to the whole Project. > > > Because I am one of the people with legal responsibility fo

Re: Linux Core Consortium

On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 05:11:32PM -0500, Ian Murdock wrote: > On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 23:07 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Ian Murdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I understand the LSB is beginning to think about the multiarch issue, > and I suspect Debian is far ahead of others in terms

Re: Debian "Sarge" Support

As far as I can see - Debian "Sarge" / Debian "testing" / Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 - now has support both for Reiserfs [?? 3.6.19??] and Reiser4 [?? 1.0.3 ??]. There is a kernel patch against version 2.6.8 for Reiser4. Hope this helps - everyone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong :) Andy -- To

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 03:23:18AM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > Just because a full Debian doesn't usually > fit today's embedded footprint doesn't mean it won't fit tomorrow's, > and in the meantime Debian's toolchain, kernel, and initrd-tools are > probably the best embedded Linux developm

Re: Co-maintainers sought

On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:01:03AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:42:25AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: > > I seek co-maintainers for: > > > > mwavem > > thinkpad, tpctl > > resolvconf > > > > I got a couple of thinkpads, so i could be a good candida

Re: switching to vim-tiny for standard vi?

On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:38:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > There are obviously users who will prefer nvi to vim (and others who > prefer some other vi), but I get the impression there are rather more who > prefer vim, it's probably the most commonly used vi in linux these days. Count me as an nvi

Re: bits from the release team

On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:13:08AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 06:43:28PM -0500, Brian Nelson wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > > > > > > Why don't we use RHEL's kernel, or collaborate with them to maintain a > > stable kernel tree, or something? > Hav

Re: Packet radio and foul language

On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:25:11PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So what's the likelihood that this is actually a problem? 0.1%? > 0.001%? > Small, but real. > > In the extremely unlikely event that it is a problem, why should it be

Re: APT public key updates?

Way to go Joey - well demonstrated :) Andy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GFDL question

On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 11:30:04AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote: > Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > El martes, 14 de marzo de 2006 a las 08:27:25 +0100, Norbert Preining > > escribía: > > > >> Ok, there are no invariant sections, but there is (a short) front and > >> back cover text. >

New bootdisks ?

I just deleted a message announcing updated bootdisks from ?? Enrique Zanardi ?? Can anyone post me the date/location for these ?? Andy [meaning to install Debian from scratch to delete Caldera Lite !] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

Can't find boot disks in Incoming

Thanks to all those that pointed me to Incoming. Having looked on llug.sep.bnl.gov and also ftp.de.debian.org - all I can find are some .in.base* files, all of which are 0 bytes long. Does this mean that Guy / someone else has already moved these to hamm/hamm/disks-i386 and that the mirrors will

Bootfloppies 12 April

Just installed Debian on an old machine using these: no _absolute_ show stoppers: When loading modules: iso-8059- is all that appears for the iso-8059-1 etc. modules Partitioning disks: Initially, I partititoned /dev/hda into /dev/hda1 (root) and /dev/hda2 (swap) and mounted /dev/hdb as /usr T

Re: Sarge release for amd64 - Please help to fix the remaining bugs

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 11:32:25AM +0200, Andreas Jochens wrote: > Debian sarge release for the amd64 architecture > --- > > At the amd porters irc meeting on 2005-04-23 07:00 UTC, the amd64 porting > team decided to release a version of sarge for amd64

Test of upgrade from Woody -> Sarge

Just a couple of quick notes: the process in general was fairly smooth, though I wouldn't want to have to do it for more than a couple of machines at a time. Hardware: Home build, Celeron 1200, 640M of memory, 40G disk, ATI Radeon video with 128M memory, 3Com 3C905, cheap CMP soundcard, genuine M

Re: [WASTE-dev-public] Do not package WASTE! UNAUTHORIZED SOFTWARE [Was: Re: Questions about waste licence and code.]

a little more complex than that, but essentially, if Debian doesn't want to include it, it doesn't have to. Let them do the same as MPlayer--I'm never going to use Debian, so why should I care? -- |Andrew A. Gill |I posted to Silent-Tristero and| |<[EMAIL

Re: RFC on mysql 4.1 in sarge

On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:01:58AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:49:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > >... > > I see the same three options. Joey has said he is working on a final woody > > point release for the last weekend in May; you'll probably need to > > coordinate

Re: Debian Sarge

On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 02:26:59PM +0200, Eddy Veenstra wrote: > > Dear Debian team, > For the future: this question and others like it would be better asked on debian-user. Debian-devel is essentially a list for Debian developers and others to discuss the development of Debian - including off-t

Linux / Debian / Ubuntu

Listening to BBC world service right now - good mentions of Linux, Open Source, Hacker Ethic - and specifically Ubuntu (mentioned as derived from Debian Linux). Go Digital - on air and on line Also mentioning "open source ethic" as a possible way of developing e.g. drugs and other collaborative de

Re: Canonical and Debian

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:34:37PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > Ok, we need more alpha machines then. If nothing else then at *least* > one for porters. Let's ask the debian-alpha list or debian-devel if > someone's got a spare alpha they don't mind parting with. I can > probably arrange hos

Re: AMD64 CDs and DVDs released

On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:10:47AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > Security.d.o may have been promised, but sarge/amd64 will not be > hosted within the official archive - Debian did not release amd64 with > sarge. > Good work, Steve. Just building the DVD's now, having downloaded the jigdo files

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:59:09AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 08:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > In any case, since you're the maintainer of the package, the decision is > > ultimately yours -- see the Debian Constitution, §3.1, point 1. In other > > words, you

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 09:39:05AM +0100, Gervase Markham wrote: > Cameron Patrick wrote: > >I'm curious as to how this would apply to Debian-derived distributions > >which either (a) don't change the Firefox/Thunderbird packages, or (b) > >change them in some trivial way. Would someone taking the

Re: Ongoing Firefox (and Thunderbird) Trademark problems

On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 01:01:05AM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > My problem with it is DFSG 8. If we accept a trademark license, we're > attaching additional rights to the program that are Debian-specific. I > understand that the DFSG were framed in the context of copyright > licenses, but I thin

Re: Bug#400070: RFP: gaia -- Google Earth client

On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:39:42PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > [Fabricio \"aybabtu\" Cannini] > > Call it a n00b question (ok, it IS a n00b question :) , but if the > > whole problem is about google's data, why don't google GPLs the > > program (google earth) ? > It's _not_ Google's dat

Re: Bug#361418: [Proposal] new Debian menu structure

On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 09:48:48AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 04:46:10PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > > Package: debian-policy > > Version: 3.6.2.2 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > Background: > > -- > > The menu structure define the list of sections and subsect

Re: Bug#361418: [Proposal] new Debian menu structure

On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 02:51:31PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > > Outdated...? The term "Ham Radio" seems a _lot_ more common than > "Amateur Radio" -- for instance, Ham Radio seems to be heard quite often > on the news (usually in connection with disasters), whereas, to be > honest I can't say I'

Re: AMD64: etch and uploads

Frank Kuester wrote > Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > In order to fulfill this requirement, is there a best practice / any > > possible way to "convert" an amd64 box which has been installed from > > debian-amd64 to an official debian amd64 box? > You could always try what I

Aladdin Ghostscript

ghostscript system. -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ===8<- >From adfernan Thu Feb 7 03:52:36 2036 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CDROM license Status: RO Hello, I have a question regarding the Aladdin Ghostscript Public

Re: Source packages

ing arguments... remember some patches will be debian-specific-platform-independent, while other patches will be debian-independent-platform-specific. We *do* hope to get debian ready for alphas and powerpcs some time in the far future... :-) -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

packaging X things

subdirectory, but make sure that these paths don't get compiled into the program, or am I going to have to bite the bullet and comb the source by hand and by grep? -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

sbpcd module init

the value should be one. Lastly, I presume (but have not tried) using arguments in the /etc/modules file. If it won't take them, it should only be a bit of tweaking to get it to go. It *should* allow the modules to take arguments... -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

e2fsprogs-dif

I have uploaded the context diff for e2fsprogs-1.01-1.diff.gz to ftp.debian.org: 89d24e4bedccc995314c18fe2bcc4af2 e2fsprogs-1.01-1.diff.gz Note that I accidentally uploaded the same file as e2fsprogs-1.01.diff.gz: that file should be deleted. -Andrew.

Bug#1851: gopher-client-2.1.1 has quotes around version and revision numbers

-client VERSION: "2.1.1" PACKAGE_REVISION: "2" MAINTAINER: Ted Hajek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DESCRIPTION: Client software to access stuff on gopher servers. Gopher+ aware. DEPENDS: netbase -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#1849: includes,source do not conflict

Package: includes Version: 1.2.13-5 includes should conflict with source -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#1850: includes,source do not conflict

Package: source Version: 1.2.13-5 includes should conflict with source -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: md5sum passwords

certainly is not more secure than "R8#cjs;)". There are plenty of references on how to pick good passwords in 8 characters. Just my 0.02$, -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

e2fsprogs-1.01

I just thought I'd notify people that I will be uploading a new version of the e2fsprogs in the next day or so that incorporate the changes suggested by Rolf . I've been a bit too busy for it yet... -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Bug#1896: fsck won't go because of elf?

(seeing as how the move is on the way!) but I can see where this problem comes in from. The trouble is, I don't know how to specify a dependency like this. So, since the elf move is on, do we assume that elf support must be compiled in the kernel? -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#1896: fsck won't go because of elf?

done

Re: inline-math-1.7 (fwd)

atical software for linux. -Andrew. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Bug#3999: nfs module fails to load

Package: kernel Version: 2.0.6 I recently updated from debian 1.1 - kernel version 2.0.0 - to 1.1.3 by installing the new package in base/kernel-image-2.0.6_2.0.6-0.deb (plus the updated dpkg and kbd). Rebooting the machine showed that all was working apart from the nfs module failing to load wit

Bug#4394: dselect does not appear to look for updates when access method is floppy

Package: dpkg Version: 1.2.14elf When using dselect with access method=floppy and filesystem=msdos, and after updating to the latest Packages file (Debian 1.1.8), a number of packages were selected as requiring updating/upgrading. Going on to attempt to Install these packages gave the message

Re: Release-critical Bugreport for March 17, 2000

Can we drop Netscape Navigator and Communicator ? Adam is busy, obviously. Mozilla will do just as well for most things (and is free) - some of the bugs on Navigator/Communicator are for obsolete versions anyway. [Note: this need not be a permanent drop, but a temporary measure to get potato out

Sound config broken in 2.2.17 ???

Hello all, Two colleagues and myself have tried to get sound working on 2.2.17 systems with Potato. [I have also tried on a Woody system] Kernel builds - sound modules aren't there. Devices in /dev are all there OK. If the soundcard drivers are built into the kernel - all appears OK - cat /de

Re: apt and multiple connections

use ftp.. On a similar (but kinda opposite) note, are there any plans to add some bandwidth-limiting functionality to apt/apt-get ? -- Andrew J Cosgriff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sheila liked the rodeo... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Opteron progress??

I was actually asked directly at work today what I thought was going to happen to Red Hat and whether Debian supported the AMD64. I've seen a couple of posts on this topic since about March. Anybody care to sum up in words suitable for a suit how well Debian supports AMD64 / when it will be read

Re: The size of debian packages

Thanks for that Scott. It works very nicely. Regards Andy

Re: gcc 4.1 with stack smashing protection in etch?

On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 11:45:21PM +0200, Michael Meyer wrote: > Hi, > now that Steve Langasek has published July 30th as the > toolchain freeze, do you already know if you will > include gcc 4.1 instead of 4.0 as the standard gcc > in etch? If yes, etch could profit from the > ProPolice-like sta

Re: buzz/rex binaries/install media?

On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 08:41:07PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > On Tuesday 18 October 2005 19.40, Matej Vela wrote: > > > See > > for buzz disks. > > Thanks. > > Now, does anybody know if buzz/Linux 2.0.0's 'ne' driver di

Re: real-i386 (was Re: i386 requalification for etch)

On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 10:35:51AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: > > I think we should at least consider to rename, since the current i386 seems > to cause a lot of confusion. When even DDs confuse the meaning how can we > expect the user to understand? > > Most people know instantanously what

Re: The 30 most popular packages missing in Debian

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:57:25PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > One of the lists from popcon.debian.org I find most interesting, is > the list of popular packages currently missing in Debian, > http://popcon.debian.org/unknown/by_vote>. I understand it to > list the packages our users wo

Re: RFC: preventing accidental deletion of system directories

On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 03:50:32PM -0500, William Pitcock wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 13:51 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote: > > To get those Vistaesque questions, "alias rm='rm -i'" is surely not > > worth a > > package. It's slightly larger in scope, but only slightly, as > > removing > >

Bug#474937: ITP: logstalgia -- a website access log visualisation tool

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrew Caudwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: logstalgia Version : 0.9.0 Upstream Author : Andrew Caudwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://code.google.com/p/logstalgia/ * License : GPL Descrip

Re: An introduction to multiarch

On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 11:57:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Hi, > > after listening to the "Multiarch round table" talk at Debconf I feel > that the talk was targeted at people already familiar with the subject > and jumped right in at full speed. Someone new to the idea was > probably

Re: Debian, universal operating system?

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:53:55PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > If memory serves correctly, that slogan was added to the web > site without discussion, and was never ratified by the project, > though I do remember Bruce being very pleased about it. > > It certainly has not b

Bug#545151: ITP: libnatspec -- a library for national and language-specific issues

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Andrew O. Shadoura" * Package name: libnatspec Version : 0.2.4 Upstream Authors: Vitaly Lipatov , Pavel Vainerman * URL : http://natspec.sourceforge.net/ * License : LGPL2.1 Programmi

amarok 2 in squeeze

Can we have amarok 1.4 as an option to use? in my opinion, amarok 2 is not usable yet. I decided to give it a try when it replaced 1.4 in squeeze, but it's missing many 1.4 features and has many unstable glitches that were not present in 1.4. Currently when I run amarok I get a dcop no reply error

Re: Results for General Resolution: Altering package upload rules

On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 09:05:10PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On pe, 2007-03-23 at 10:32 +0100, BALLABIO GERARDO wrote: > > > Debian Project Secretary wrote: > > > > At the end of voting, with 313 Ballots resulting in 260 votes from 257 > > > develo

Re: Bug#427297: ITP: sturmbahnfahrer -- simulated obstacle course for automobiles

On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 04:00:28PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 02:30:43AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz a écrit : > > Package: wnpp > > * Package name: sturmbahnfahrer > > Dear Miriam, > > I have very bad feelings when I read the name of this game. It is a very > bad taste pla

Re: i386 33meg boot iso

On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:14:14AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo [Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 11:19:25PM -0400]: > > To: All > > > This list is targetted at the development of Debian, not at user > support. You will find better answers if you try > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I think you m

Re: Using standardized SI prefixes

On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 02:32:35PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:15:25PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le lundi 11 juin 2007 à 15:25 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit : > > > > You seem to fancy the K-is-1024--k-is-1000 convention > > > > No, I hate that convention. K and k

Re: Testers needed: aptitude 0.4.5.2

On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 10:23:27AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Hi all, > > The ported aptitude should merge its database of automatically > installed packages into the apt database -- any packages listed as > automatic in either database will become automatic. > Dude - YOU ROCK :) This is

Re: I don't understand Debian

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 08:24:22PM +0200, ignatius wrote: > I have two questions that really concerned me. > > - Why it's Debian that fixes bugs and security holes? Why it isn't > upstream developers? How can you be sure that all security holes will be > found or revealed? (for instance an old s

Re: Agreement between parties achieved on IRC (Re: virtualbox-ose: package hijack?)

On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 05:33:40PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > Just a quick note to say that after some discussion in #debian-devel > involving Daniel, Patrick, and Michael, and fostered by various DDs > (azeem, buxy, Ganneff, myself), a solution to resolve this situation was > achieved. > Can

Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent

On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 06:54:32PM +0100, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > Quoting Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Turbo Fredriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Why was it removed from Debian GNU/Linux in the first place!? > > > > It's never been in Debian. The source package is in non-fre

Re: Bug#457318: ITP: qmail -- a secure, reliable, efficient, simple message transfer agent

On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 07:12:09PM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote: > Miros/law Baran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Ah, but it's been there, once. I remember that my first Debian > > installation included in the default setup all the accounts used by > > qmail (if not the qmail itself). > > OK, that'

Re: Xen, Squeeze, and Beyond

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:53:56PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > Hi folks, > > There was a thread here a little while back about the status of Xen in > future Debian releases. It left me rather confused, and I'm hoping to > find some answers (which I will then happily document in the wiki). > > A

Re: Looking for maintainers of Spacewalk packages

On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 06:08:43AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Hi, > I'm developer of Spacewalk [1,2]. Spacewalk is an open source > (GPLv2) Linux systems management solution. It is the upstream > community project from which the Red Hat Network Satellite product > is derived. > > Recently we a

Bug#587522: ITP: twms -- tiny WMS service

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Andrew O. Shadoura" * Package name: twms Version : 0.01q Upstream Author : Darafei Praliaskouski * URL : http://code.google.com/p/twms/ * License : GPL-3+ Programming Lang: Python Description : tiny W

Bug#593775: ITP: indicator-sound -- system sound indicator for the indicator applet

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Andrew Starr-Bochicchio" * Package name: indicator-sound Version : 0.3.8-1 Upstream Author : Conor Curran * URL : https://launchpad.net/indicator-sound * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: C, Vala D

Bug#593779: ITP: ido -- widgets and other objects used for indicators

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Andrew Starr-Bochicchio" * Package name: ido Version : 0.1.10-1 Upstream Author : Cody Russell * URL : http://launchpad.net/ido/ * License : LGPL-3 or LGPL-2.1 Programming Lang: C Description : w

Bug#607358: ITP: hinotify -- Hinotify is a Haskell library for inotify, a part of the Linux kernel

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "R. Andrew Bailey" * Package name: hinotify Version : 0.3.1 Upstream Author : Lennart Kolmodin * URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage- scripts/package/hinotify * License : BSD Programming Lan

Re: Bug#518696: ITP: parallel -- build and execute command lines from standard input in parallel

On 29/12/10 15:28 -0600, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Time has passed and parallel became a GNU project: http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/ I guess packaging it can be reconsidered? Samuel I've been working on a package for parallel, but I'm a newbie maintainer so it'll probably turn

Re: Programming first steps.

On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:45:51PM +0800, David Palmer wrote: > > I thought that I might make a beginning at learning. Good call :) > I've searched the web, found information that goes beyond the definition > of plethora, so I thought that I'd ask here. "Go not to Usenet - for you will be told Y

Re: Debian Enterprise?

On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:45:05AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote: > Over the past week, my boss and I have had discussions about the niche > left by RedHat, and the possibility of working on a > distribution/sub-project aimed at enterprise folks. The plan is to target > those RedHat users and compan

HELP - Screen is flooded with DHCP messages.

Firewall died, taking down disk. New disk: clean install of Woody upgraded to testing. Two network cards: 3COM 3C905C 10/100M as (internal) card (eth0) 3COM Etherlink III as cable modem facing (external) card eth1. Simple Iptables firewall. DHCP needs to work, as does ddtc for resolving dynamic

Re: Need access to an Alpha

Would an Alpha in UK be OK?? Running Debian unstable and potentially on 24/7 Andy - Original Message - From: "Andrew Pollock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 11:04 AM Subject: Need access to an Alpha

Do not touch l10n files

Some common sense rules, perhaps. 1. No one person can produce a solution to fit everyone. 2. The translation teams / translators should try as far as possible to maintain the meaning of the original. Sentence structure / paragraphing / layout / punctuation will vary from language to language.

Braille, anyone??

The RNIB have released the source to their Braille conversion program Braille-It under the GPL. This is a tool, written in C, which will take text and convert it into contracted Braille. [For those that don't appreciate this: grade 1 British Braille spells out words letter for letter, grade 2 is co

Re: Woody version number

Read the archives for the sad history of version numbers and the flamewars :) Please remember that the reason we went to using version names was prompted by Debian 1.0. [For those that don't know: Debian was at something like 0.97 when a vendor [?? Infomagic ??] released a prerelease snapshot whi

Debian testing - uninstallable packages

sarchie zmailer suggestsmail-user-agent -- Andrew. ------ Andrew M. Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gedanken.demon.co.uk/

Re: Debian source code search engine

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 02:44:02AM +0200, Peter De Wachter wrote: > Op Mon, 25 May 2009 03:36:28 +0100 > schreef Ben Hutchings : > > > Cool - that looks really useful. However, it looks like you're just > > running "dpkg-source -x" to unpack packages. This misses any Debian > > changes made usin

Bug#753962: ITP: ghp-import -- Easily import docs to your gh-pages branch

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Andrew Starr-Bochicchio" * Package name: ghp-import Version : 0.4.1 Upstream Author : Paul Joseph Davis * URL : https://github.com/davisp/ghp-import * License : Tumbolia Public License Programming La

Re: Bug#753962: ITP: ghp-import -- Easily import docs to your gh-pages branch

On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Thomas Koch wrote: > On Sunday, July 06, 2014 07:14:49 PM Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: >> Inside your repository just run `ghp-import $DOCS_DIR` where $DOCS_DIR >> is the path to the built documentation. This will write a commit to your >>

Re: Node.js and it's future in debian

est of us understand the issues your user would face? Apologies if you've covered this elsewhere (I've read this thread but not all of the past ones). Thanks! -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething> Debian Maintainer <

Re: Wheezy release: CDs are not big enough any more...

On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 11:30:12PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On May 12, Adam Borowski wrote: > > > Thus, let's just switch dpkg-deb's default to xz. Lowering bandwidth usage > > is worth the extra build time cost. > Agreed, this looks like a good idea. > > -- > ciao, > Marco The only probl

Re: Debian documentation permalinks

generate it is available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-manpage-repository -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething> Debian Maintainer <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com> PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- T

Bug#684093: ITP: libgtk2-appindicator-perl -- Perl bindings for libappindicator

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Andrew Starr-Bochicchio" * Package name : libgtk2-appindicator-perl Version : 0.14 Upstream Author : Hans Oesterholt URL : https://launchpad.net/libgtk2-appindicator-perl/ License : Artistic, LGPL-2+ Programming Lang: Perl Descript

Bug#708306: ITP: typecatcher -- Download Google webfonts for off-line use

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Andrew Starr-Bochicchio" * Package name: typecatcher Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Andrew Starr-Bochicchio * URL : https://launchpad.net/typecatcher * License : GPL-3 Programming Lang: Python D

Re: bzr (was: Re: Debian systemd survey)

icely for that usecase yet. I'd encourage anyone who cares about this workflow and these packages to continue any further discussion of bazaar in Debian over on pkg-bazaar-maint. Thanks! -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething> Deb

Bug#710060: ITP: pyflot -- interface from Python to libjs-flot

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Andrew Starr-Bochicchio" * Package name: pyflot Version : 0.1 Upstream Andre da Palma * URL : http://github.com/andrefsp/pyflot * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python Description : interface from

Re: DM Upload

n it if needed. Thanks, -- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething> Debian Developer <http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=asb> PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#715182: ITP: fonts-junction -- humanist sans-serif typeface

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Andrew Starr-Bochicchio" * Package name: fonts-junction Version : 18de8417c6 [1] Upstream Author : Caroline Hadilaksono * URL : http://www.theleagueofmoveabletype.com/junction * License : SIL Programming

Re: how can we help DSA save money

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 07:13:57PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Steven Chamberlain > > > On 2013-07-22 15:49, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > > It's not, it's a limitation of resizing a raid and that requiring about > > > a billion seeks across the disk surface. > > > > I didn't realise it was

Re: Bug#717538: ITP: python-django-oauth-plus -- Support of OAuth 1.0a in Django using python-oauth2

sn't clear to me that this is was a provider and not something that helped consumers do the OAuth dance. There are a number of other Django OAuth providers (not packaged for Debian AFAIK). The description should give me a hint as to why I should use this one. Thanks! -- Andrew Starr-Bochi

Re: Dreamhost dumps Debian

package that are Ubuntu specific. This is the resulting compromise: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField That said, Debian maintainers should not be receiving automatic emails without explicitly opting in. If they do, that is a bug that should be fixed. Thanks, -- Andrew Starr-Boch

<    7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >