Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> ...and where is SuSv3 in Debian (which package?).
[...]
Nonfree. http://packages.debian.org/susv3
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inc
inue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
ual
b) apt-key.8
c) perhaps somewhere else
Could maintainers of a) and b) (and perhaps c) ;-)) acknowledge, that this
will be done or should we rather file bug reports (IMHO with severity
"important") to these packages?
Kind regards
Andreas.
PS: debian-boot@lists.debian.o
day I had the same issue in my i386 chroot, so the issue
seems to persist
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Andreas Fester wrote:
>> I experienced the same some time ago and worked it around
>> by temporarily switching to a different mirror. It then succeeded,
>> and afterwards
* Santiago Vila ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 11:34]:
> It seems testing and unstable change twice a day now, which is fantastic.
Also britney runs now twice per day, and ftp-master host has changed
(now ries).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
loser and many people are
> happy because that, including myself :-)
Thank you for this information, I adjusted the bug severity so that
it occurs on our list of critical bugs.
Regards,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:29]:
> Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:16 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > * Mgr. Peter Tuharsky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:07]:
> > > I don't intend to do any advocacy. I just wish to politely point Your
> >
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061128 12:36]:
> Le mardi 28 novembre 2006 à 12:30 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > > FWIW, fixing this bug requires changes in the kernel.
> >
> > Why that? AFAICR, umount must not return before not everything is
> > written
package maintainer has
caught up with the database, the maintainer is responsible for future
sections).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Stefano Zacchiroli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061129 16:41]:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 04:28:24PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > If you are maintainer of a non-free-package falling into this category (i.e.
> > after careful review of the license that it can be autobuild), pleas
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
On the other hand, there are plenty of packages in non-free that can easily
be autobuild, because their license is "free-with-tiny-exceptions". For such
packages, a group of Developers headed by Martin (zobel) and me provides some
au
quot;(normally)".
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as well as the security team.
I'm sorry, but I didn't see any comments from you on this bug report -
though perhaps I didn't look deep enough.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
means can be quite different in different
cases - so in the end, it is (mostly) the maintainers decision (as you
wrote).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00417.html
There seemed to be no interest in dict-wn because this
call for help gathered no response at all and I'm unable
to fix the problem myself. IMHO it is a shame to have
such a weak dict support.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBS
few months.
If you are able to compile it yourself you are also able to do it via
apt-get source dictd
debuild
So there is not really much to learn about packaging. In case
you have questions ask on debian-mentors or debian-devel.
Kind regards
Andreas.
PS: Reporting the problem
nencrypted e-mail
in general does. Even encrypted e-mail might not be really
safe. So what?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
u are fail to find a sponsor my interest in dict is high enough
to invest some spare time.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cked? Which operations do behave as
> if the bug were not blocked, which operations behave differently, and
> what's the behavioral difference between being blocked and not?
Afaik there are no changes in behavior. blocks are only
informational.
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning&#x
SIGNATURE-
- End forwarded message -
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061209 12:07]:
> Le samedi 09 décembre 2006 à 11:35 +0100, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > | * Fixed "Incorrect shlibs information". Closes: #401465.
> > --- libpng-1.2.15~beta5.orig/debian/libpng12-0.shli
essary. I would rather recommend to only add it during
first installation, and remove it during purge. Why bother at other
places?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
more severe a bug is, and the less invasive the fix is (and not
knowing one means "quite invasive") the better is the probability that
the tech ctte agrees it should be fixed.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as that I wanted a blocking annotation be automatically removed
> when the blocking bug was closed.
[...]
That is happening partially. - http://bdo/packagename is updated
dynamically, however http://bdo/bugnumber isn't - it keeps the full
list.
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleanin
vene or mediate in this matter if a
> hijack seems justified?
The tech ctte can decide about who should be a maintainer for a package
- but this probably would be only a very-last solution, one I hope will
never occur.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(because g follows f in alphabethical order) sounds as a
good name as successor of fdisk.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 15:28]:
> Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Format: 1.7
> > Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:42:31 +
> > Source: attr
> > Binary: libattr1 attr libattr1-dev
images.
Sorry, what is GPE?
Yes, I'm sure Google would be my friend for this question but package
descriptions should not require other resources to be understandable
for the user.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
ou can change the depends to a recommends for lanny (or
was it larry? lenny?) later on.
/andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
;
250 OK
RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
451 greylisted
RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
250 Accepted
DATA
[...]
and the non-greylist users will usually simply receive the mail
immediately. The same thing would apply to DNS-lists tests, rcpt to
for enabled acounts is rejected, the others re
ndex.html#toc0325
> Same question for greylisting: is it enabled unconditionally, or only
> for mails for which callout fails or hosts belonging to RBLs?
Unconditional greylisting.
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision o
perating system. So I would like to suggest to move this
thread to debian-curiosa.
Happy new year to all list members
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ugh-problem or more
directly connected with the release (for example in the installer like
Joey) might take it differently than me as just a normal package
maintainer.
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor'
the plugin's additional dependencies into Recommends,
using "dpkg-shlibdeps -vRecommends" but as the program would not work
without any plugin packaging them separately indeed seems to be the
sanest way.
cu andreas
[1] fasel|foo|bar, fasel| blah does not work since it allows
inst
On 2007-01-05 Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:33:56PM +0100, Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > You could move the plugin's additional dependencies into Recommends,
> > using "dpkg-shlibdeps -vRecommends&q
Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> You could move the plugin's additional dependencies into Recommends,
> using "dpkg-shlibdeps -vRecommends"
[...]
-v is a typo, -d is the correct thing, e.g this
dpkg-shlibdeps /usr/bin/xine \
-dRecommends
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jari Aalto wrote:
> [Please keep CC]
>
> Where should the bugs found in "Debian New Maintainers' Guide" be
> reported? BTS package name?
maint-guide?
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=maint-guide
Bes
t (PDK)
Great. Could you be so kind to announce the package at debian-custom
list once it has hit ftp mirror?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what's the best way to read a package list into
python?)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in question to track down the problem
and seek for more detailed information.
Kind regards
Andreas.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (499, 'testing'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bi
like answers that do not fit for the problem and you can believe
me that I'm skilled enough to track down simple things that are described
in FAQs.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e well
without using it for pcre for three major releases, and I seem to
recall that pkg-config is still a major source for unneeded linking
against indirect dependencies, mainly due to #340904.
Moved to d-d. (I am subscribed, no need to cc me.)
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning&#x
ur?
You could simply use start-stop-daemon instead of su.
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publish
gards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nation would be nice.
Keen on building new machines
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it is not really clever but the only chance. There is no
real cleverness in it - but finally this is of topic here to discuss.
If I will get no further comments until weekend I will start with
the digging.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
f old bugs (( even though it wasn't _this specific version_ where the
> bug was fixed )).
[...]
Does not look like that. Afaict current upstream is still gnuplot
4.0.0, released 2004. And 4.0.0-1 has been uploaded to unstable on
2004-05-27.
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cle
it is redirected with
/etc/aliases?
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Hello,
>> system users like proxy, sshd or identd usually do not receive any
>> mail at all. And system-users that _do_ receive mail are usually
>> redirected to a real user by /etc/aliases.
>&g
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 12:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
>> And now I am wondering whether this will break existing packages.
> Maybe not *packages*, but possibly non-Debian software.
non-Debian software, running in the Debian sy
Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Re: Andreas Metzler 2006-04-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> #1 sane packages redirect mail via /etc/aliases
>> #2 un-aliased mail to systemusers (e.g. spam) is not accepted and
>> dumped into /var/mail/systemuser but reje
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 07:53:44PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2006-04-09 at 12:25 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> And now I am won
kg calls? I don't remember how smart/stupid libapt was there. It
> > might be best to add "apt-get install libc6 libc-bin" to the upgrade
> > instructions.
>
> If that is needed, please file a bug report against release-notes.
But it would better if that wouldn't
debian-release@lists.debian.org, and attach a diff.
That will help us all, give you immediate feedback and makes sure there
are no unnecessary actions required.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssphrase more frequently than necessary.
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
h
would you want to do that?
cu andreas
--
The 'Galactic Cleaning' policy undertaken by Emperor Zhark is a personal
vision of the emperor's, and its inclusion in this work does not constitute
tacit approval by the author or the publisher for any such projects,
howsoever under
[1] For me that's just >10
*useless* mails for every upload I do.
> and when binNMU occur.
I guess more people are interested in that, but this should be
different keyword triggered when debian-release marks a package for
bin-NMU, but not for the >10 separate uploads.
#x27;X' if I skipped several upstream versions inbetween?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> i am disgusted. ...
>
> Dear fellow powerpc folk, this clearly means that the debian support for
> powerpc is dead or almost so, and i strongly recomend you to go find another
> distribution to run which cares a bit more about the powerpc architecture.
I'd rather prefer
* Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:53]:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:23]:
> > > Dear fellow powerpc folk, this clearly means that the debian support for
> > > powerpc
ld still prevent that bad things remain.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken from
> me, and why i find out only now as i was going to fix the issue ?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/03/msg01075.html sounds like
you stepped back, an
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 17:03]:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> > > Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken
> > > from
> > >
ed on beliefs?
Hey, that would be violating the rules of a flame fest. :)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 18:38]:
> c) The mipsel builds had been down nearly as long. And that machine
>seems to be dead. Argh.
Would you need access to another mipsel machine?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
uests for the addition of 'ppc64'
to the architecture line in debian/control as 'wontfix'.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
curity
upgrades.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Brian Eaton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060501 16:42]:
> On 5/1/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Brian Eaton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060501 15:51]:
> >> The only time delta packages will be a win is for upgrades where the
> >> client has the original pack
* Brian Eaton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060501 17:49]:
> On 5/1/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Brian Eaton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060501 16:42]:
> >> On 5/1/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >If one does i
* Brian Eaton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060501 19:21]:
> On 5/1/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Or you could create the diffdebs before upload or on ftp-master, and
> >include the diffdebs somehow in the Packages file (so they're signed as
> >well by the
* Darren Salt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060502 19:03]:
> I demand that Andreas Barth may or may not have written...
> > * Brian Eaton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060501 19:21]:
> >> On 5/1/06, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Or you could create the diffdebs
which is obviously wrong.
Basically, the tool should just work on *changes* upstream, i.e. if
upstream goes from reopened to resolved/fixed.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ists), which sounds reasonnable to me.
Actually, if someone installs etch r0, I expect that he can install etch
r5 without any hassle (unless ftp-master was hijacked :). This means
that the key used in r5 needs to be available in etch r0.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-bar
break
anything. Please check also that you're not just disturbing a transition
(e.g. don't NMU packages in sid the day before they go to testing :).
Questions should go to debian-release also (though of course I read d-d
also :).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-ba
* Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 08:59]:
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
> > whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
> &g
* Mike Hommey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 11:00]:
> On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 10:09:11AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 11:10:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > Hi,
> >
> > hi,
> >
> > >
please leave
-release out of the discussion. :)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Ganesan Rajagopal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 14:12]:
> >>>>> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> An upload of python-defaults switching to 2.4 has been repeatedly asked
> >> during the last months, and it was ignored by the maintain
* Julian Gilbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 22:17]:
> Does anyone know why the binary package gnome is no longer in testing?
> The source package meta-gnome2 is there
Seems like an accident currently. We're researching the matter.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/an
date, which is due in May.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ou'll get results
in May (and hopefully already after the python BoF on debconf).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060512 00:00]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > * Thomas Bushnell BSG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 23:54]:
> >> Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> > what about the transitio
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 20:21]:
> On Thu, 11 May 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Ganesan Rajagopal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060511 14:12]:
> > > >>>>> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > >> An uploa
ll packages to install native
amd64 libraries in /usr/lib is simple and sane. This should not be
changed.
Anything which makes it easier to violate this simple policy
will lead to a mixed usage of /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 and consequently
to problems which could be difficult to disentangle later.
Thi
On 06-May-19 11:02, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anything which makes it easier to violate this simple policy
> > will lead to a mixed usage of /usr/lib and /usr/lib64 and consequently
> > to problems which could be dif
of etpan-ng and an
upload of a changed version of etpan-ng (with a conflict to the current
version of libetpan) could help? Gerfried, what do you think?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe&q
m the devref.
Well, wouldn't it be a good idea to make just sync the dev ref with what
you consider as best practice? (And, BTW, I make much effort to only
update the dev ref with correct information.)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Hi,
this dependend bugs are also available via usertags:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-4.1;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
eers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
il is a little bit overdone and brings a DD
in a bad light. Perhaps an information to the partipiciants
of the KSP in question would have done the job and it should
be easy enough to find out the address list of the partipiciants.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
* Manoj Srivastava ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060525 08:15]:
> On 24 May 2006, Andreas Barth stated:
>
> > * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060524 17:54]:
> >> So I guess you can still criticize folks for this if you want to,
> >> but I know that my own ongoing no
for.
I know that Peter Palfrader (weasel) submits sometimes a clear fake key
to KSPs and looks for people signing it. (No, there is nobody there who
claims to be that person. Only the key on the list.)
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
it matter?
The *binary* packages require a newer version of openssl, they would
be uninstallable in testing.
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/bacula-sd
| libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8a-1) [m68k]
| SSL shared libraries
| libssl0.9.8 (>= 0.9.8b-1) [not m68k]
| SSL shared libraries
t
epends on the new package.
Finally, after etch has been released end of this year,
I file a bug asking ftpmaster to remove the old, dummy package.
Is this the correct approach? Anything I missed?
Thanks & Best Regards,
Andreas
- --
Andreas Fester
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Andreas Fester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.29.2114 +0200]:
>> Replaces: oldPackage
>> Conflicts: oldPackage (<< firstVersionOfNewPackage)
>
> Also: Provides: oldPackage, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (gmane.linux.debian.devel.general) you wrote:
> On (29/05/06 21:29), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
>> * gnutls, gcrypt, libtasn1, libksba
>> (security-critical, some work required, having a team for these
>> packages
contain
any architecture specific files anymore, or is it better to
leave it as it is with "Architecture: any" to create
architecture specific packages?
Thanks,
Andreas
Andreas Fester wrote:
[...]
> Problem:
>
> Upstream application (non-library) has changed its name.
assembling RAID devices: failed."
$ ./raid
Starting RAID devices ...
/dev/md0 has been started with 3 drives..
/dev/md1 has been started with 3 drives..
/dev/md2 assembled from 2 drives - need all 3 to start it.
/dev/md3 assembled from 1 drive - not enough to start the array..
/dev/m
701 - 800 of 4693 matches
Mail list logo
