pp for it?
>...
fnlib builds the binary packages libfnlib-dev and libfnlib0. These
packages are still needed by enlightenment.
> Ciao
> Christian
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
...
>
> Too late. }:)
>...
Grrr...
He filed them:
- without subject
- with severity "serious"
These are at most "normal" bugs in packages with a Standards-Version
< 3.0.0
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
&q
be necessary,
>but just in case).
> 5. Remove /usr/doc
> 6. Link /usr/doc to /usr/share/doc
1,3,5,6 need doing (for instance dh_installdocs will install symlinks in
/usr/doc if /usr/doc exists if /usr/doc/ doesn't exist). However do
we really need the rest? It'd be ni
to find packages whose maintainer is AWOL - all other
packages should have been updated until then.
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
lled in the archive, but you can upload new and adopted
packages through a sponsor, work on the boot floppies and many other
things without a Debian account.
> marek
cu,
Adrian
--
A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a
"Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble.
-- Mahatma Ghandi
ven if I know what I'm doing
- I tell my best friend: "Unstable currently runs fine and if you want you
can give it a try."
That would be the first time where Debian would try to regulate what I do
in the time when I'm not working for Debian and at that point I would
immed
since I find the issues useful - I found useful
articles in all the ones I read. Unfortuantely since I left uni I havn't
been sufficiently bored to remember to download and read them (and hence to
package them).
d) I was hoping the "data" section of Debian would get into policy s
ink it
> has Sound Blaster compatibility as far as the port
> drivers are concerned.
I doubt it. IBM has (finally) release MWave drivers for certain thinkpads,
but I doubt these will work on your PC:
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developer/opensource/linux/projects/mwave/
Adrian
Email: [EMAIL
. As a
solution I suggest the following:
When a package was only uploaded to stable the bugs aren't closed but
tagged "woody" instead. When the package goes into testing the bugs get
closed.
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern wei
On Sun, 22 Apr 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 03:11:41AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I think we have a new problem with the closing of bugs since there is
> > testing: Currently, bugs get closed when a package goes into unstable.
&g
cedure in this case? i don't want to displease
> anyone, but this dependency on the old library is annoying quite some
> of us.
Are there any real problems or what does "annoyning" mean?
> ciao,
> federico
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
nvolve your packages" mail
sent some time before a bug squashing party fulfills the "E-mail the
maintianer." .
> -- John
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
nclusion of the full GPL text in
all GPL'ed packages)...
> - mdz
cu
Adrian
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/78341
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise,&
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:52:13AM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 10:39:20AM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote:
> >
> > From a user's point of view it doesn't matter whether the lack
tuations is to:
- a distribution that supports all the hardware they have
- install the computers once
- get regular security updates
These people are definitely not interested in tracking which maintainers
are MIA or things like that.
> Britton Kerin
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise
0 that works fine with the drivers in XFree86 >= 4.2.
There are some small issues with the DVI-output, but it's basically
working and the issues are the same with both the drivers in XFree86 and
the drivers by Matrox (the drivers by Matrox are based on the drivers
in XFree86).
cu
Adr
ere are versions of this card with a DVI output),
but it's unlikely that you get such a card at your usual hardware
vendor.
If you _really want_ Debian there are often ways, but often it's easier
to switch the distribution.
> - mdz
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not prom
h collides with the packages supported by
Debian 3.0.
Instead in continuing this discussion, let's agree on some points:
- you can find hardware that works with Debian 3.0
- much new hardware doesn't work with Debian 3.0
- it would be good if Debian would release more frequent (e.g. once a
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:51:51PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:36:34PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Instead in continuing this discussion, let's agree on some points:
> > - you can find hardware that works with Debian 3.0
> > - much n
hese updates introduces a new bug
(IMHO a conservative estimation) these packages will bring 100 new bugs
into _a released stable_.
> ciao,
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had be
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 08:41:50AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
>...
> I accept your observation on my proposal, but i would more appreciate other
> ideas and/or solutions.
If there was a stable release of Debian once a year Debian 3.1 was
already released.
>
nd restructure the thing to
make it simple enough.
> cu,
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:30:28PM +0100, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If you start asking you will likely find more than thousand packages
> > where someone will have a good reason for an update of the package
> > in Debian
;
> > If it's too complex, it's time to rethink and restructure the thing to
> > make it simple enough.
>
> That's what I mean. Try to remove complexity by restructuring
> it. However, by restructuring things, you will also introduce other
> complexiti
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:17:14AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If there was a stable release of Debian once a year Debian 3.1 was
> > already released.
>
> hehe, i knew you would ha
d be left for your "base package"?
> my 2 cents
> --
> mattia
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:26:24AM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 03:51:51PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > > I don't think you'll find much argument with those p
r because the
> version number is hardwired into the only available package's name.
Most of these packages include binaries linked with libtcl8.3.so.1 .
It would be completely wrong if the dependency wasn't on tcl8.3, theses
programs wouldn't even start without tcl8.3 installed.
cu
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:17:35AM -0500, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 04:35:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If you _really_ need or want a more recent version of a package there's
> > always the possibility to use a backport.
>
> > speed the release process. For example, a prominent release goal for
> > > sarge will be debian-installer, since we cannot release without it.
> > > Will telling the d-i developers "you must be finished by > > date>" bring it to completion faster?
>
ckages/
>
> The package (1) does not deal with the logcheck mess that I am trying to
> solve.
>
> data
>
> (1) spamassassin
This problem [1] was reported a week ago isn't even fixed in unstable.
Get it fixed in unstable and the fix will go into the backport.
cu
Adria
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 06:48:58PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 05:24:19PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >
> > > So you agree on having a bounce of personal archives on p.d.o rather than
> > > a
> > > way of getting them in stable t
l to fix, but doesn't
indicate noone would be interested in this architecture.
> ciao, |
> Marco | [987 sp7FmbP1wiu6Q]
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
Debian list for this architecture whether someone can give
you an account on a machine of this architecture
> Jamin W. Collins
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
t's documented somewhere. All I know is that it
worked in the past and it's worth trying it.
> Jamin W. Collins
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"
is going on here? It appears that apart from 'animals',
> the only things depending on libdb2++ (the C++ interface to libdb2) are
> *future* versions of the C++ interface to libdb. Why are they depending
> on it? This seems odd to me.
These "dependencies" are versio
not lower than the lowest possible next
maintainer upload version number is simply broken.
The NMU versioning scheme in the Developer's Reference might sound
strange, but it's needed for exactly this reason.
> regards,
> junichi
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there no
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 07:57:46PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 08:42:37PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >>...
> >> I contacted the SRM about the possibility of inclusion of gimp-print
> &
programs linked with
two or more so-versions of a library at the same time.
There are problems with so-name changes (I remember one library having
5 (five) different so-names within one month), but they should be
solvable via communication between maintainers.
cu
Adrian
BTW: Please Cc me
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:02:58PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk
>
>
> [...]
>
> | If libd1 is uploaded and only one of proga and libv0 is recompiled with
> | libd1 this results in proga linked with both so-versions of the library.
> | I remember probl
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian Neumaier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kwin-decor-suse2
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Gerd Fleischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.gerdfleischer.de/kwin-decor-suse2/
* License
n), but
someone might want to check how many packages in Debian use
AC_FUNC_MKTIME and whether some of them might have real problems.
cu
Adrian
BTW: Please Cc me on replies.
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. T
ws as I can get ;).
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/swt-gtk
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
I'm CC-ing to debian-java.
The package swt-gtk (3.4.2-1) was uploaded.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
The latest lintian complains about dh_nativejava prepending paths to
maintainer scripts. I wish to know what's the status of fixing this
since it's affecting a package of mine.
The bug report #511491 submitted a patch, I think.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
signature.asc
Descrip
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian Glaubitz
* Package name: kcemu
Version : 0.4.2
Upstream Author : Torsten Paul
* URL : http://kcemu.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : A software emulator for
rt.
>
> Many thanks to the rest of the Emacs development team for their hard
> work; and to the numerous users who contributed suggestions and bug
> reports. Happy hacking.
>
>
> ___
> GNU Announcement mailing list
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnu
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-30 at 15:31 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adrian Perez (30/07/2009):
> > I'd like to see this in unstable ASAP.
>
> Get to work?
>
> Mraw,
> KiBi.
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Sorry about the tone, you misunderstood me.
What I'm actually saying is that I'm willing to do anything to get this
quickly in unstable. I'll file the wishbug. Thanks for everything.
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 00:39 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Adrian Perez writes:
>
> &
Hello.
This may not be relevant in here, but I felt the need to ask.
There's any plan of supporting another format - without breaking
compatibility, I mean supporting - besides the RFC one?
I think YAML would be a good one.
IMHO there is stuff that could be somehow automated, then reviewed, but
no
Your explanation seems fine. In the meantime, I'll try to work on
something more suitable, maybe getting build-depends as array or hash
members, I dunno. anyways, thanks for you to answer.
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 11:12 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:01:36AM -0400
1 from
> unstable/testing.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Rob Browning
> rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
> GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
>
>
--
Best regards,
Adrian Perez
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
a DEP3-compliant
> header but would that resolve your concerns?
>
> Is that really better over (auto-)duplicating those fields when needed?
>
> Anyway, I'd rather wait some time until people have tried using this
> format before deciding if we must make some special case
probably better if you all go outside and get some fresh air and daylight
instead of playing with your neck beard and pony tail and worrying
needlessly about geeky stuff
--
Checked for viruses by Gigantic Computing using AVG
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.4.0/
be good if maintainers would sometimes check whether their
packages are actually built with compiler optimization enabled.
This does not apply to the cases where maintainers intentionally build
packages without compiler optimization (to work around compiler or
application bugs).
TIA
Adrian
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Joey Schulze wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Due to upstream bugs and/or packaging mistakes some Debian packages like
> > Abiword [1] or Wireshark [2] are currently unintentionally built without
> > any compiler optimization [3].
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: natpmp
Version: 0.2.0
Upstream Author: Adrian Friedli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL: http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/natpmp/
License: GNU GPL 2
Description: NAT Port M
Am Samstag, 3. November 2007 schrieb Bernd Zeimetz:
> Out of curiosity: What does natpmp have in common with upnp, and where
> are the differences?
NAT-PMP is intended for two things, requesting a routers public IP address and
adding/removing port forwardings, UPnP can do much more. NAT-PMP is mu
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian Glaubitz
Hi,
this is a emulation library for z80 CPUs. It is required for the kcemu KC85/4
emulator developed by Thorsten Paul which I also packaged (#538914). But it
may also be used for other emulators.
Adrian
* Package name: z80ex
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian Glaubitz
Hi,
I would like to package qhimdtransfer for Debian which is the graphical frontend
to a library called libhimd which we also develop. libhimd is also intended for
packaging in another ITP (#533112) in Debian. Up to now, we are linking
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian Glaubitz
* Package name: gkrellm-cpufreq
Version : 0.6.1
Upstream Author : Christoph Winkelmann
* URL : http://mathicse.epfl.ch/~winkelma/gkrellm2-cpufreq/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:00:14PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> ../common/JackAPI.cpp:303: error: cannot convert 'int' to 'va_list'
> for argument '4' to 'jack_client_t* jack_client_open_aux(const char*,
> jack_options_t, jack_status_t*, va_list)'
The code in question:
jack_client_open_aux
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 05:50:39PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > The code in question:
> >
> >jack_client_open_aux(client_name, (jack_options_t)options, NULL, NULL);
>
> Instead of trying to fake up an empty va_list, why not call the varargs
> version, with only the argument terminator in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: orxonox
Version:
Upstream Author: Orxonox Development Team
URL: http://www.orxonox.net/
License: GPL 2, CC-BY-SA 3.0
Description: Orxonox is a spacecraft shooter that pla
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Adrian Knoth
* Package name: a2jmidid
Version : 6
Upstream Author : Nedko Arnaudov
* URL : http://home.gna.org/a2jmidid/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : daemon for exposing legacy ALSA MIDI in
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:08:02PM +0100, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hi!
[CELT for spice]
> Yeah I am aware of the celt _madness_ - I am one of the mumble
> maintainers..
>
> spice then has to be adjusted to support celt 0.9.
I strongly support this demand. It was wrong to use CELT in the first
plac
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:19:05PM +0100, marcin wrote:
[No other audio app starts when there's already one running]
> I'm sorry but I cannot tell which package exactly is the source of the
> problem so I put it in 'general' section.
Well, looks like a classic: on some (most?) audio cards, ALSA o
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 12:42:38PM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> In the scientific field a lot of software depend of qt3. And a lot of
Same for kpicosim, but I'm pretty confident that I can run qt3to4 on it
and simply link with qt4's qt3 support library.
Last time I tried, the whole process
ave used lintian
these bugs would have never existed.
cu
Adrian
BTW: I'm not subscribed to debian-devel
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-checkit.en.html
[2] http://lintian.debian.org
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of t
On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 01:39:44PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> There are more serious lintian errors like missing-depends-line (nine
> packages - nine RC bugs). If the maintainer would have used lintian
> these bugs would have never existed.
>...
A small correction:
While pr
taller for
these architectures in 3.1r1 or 3.1r2. This way Debian 3.1 might be
released more early, and even for the affected architectures it's
better, since additionally to the status quo (installing and using
Debian 3.0), they can upgrade to Debian 3.1 .
Thanks for reading this mail.
Yours
Adri
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:42:26PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > During the last months, the number of RC bugs of packages in unstable
> > was constant at 700 bugs including 500 RC bugs in packages that are
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:34:27AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 03:42:26PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > For testing to work good, it's required to have unstable in a good
&g
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 08:48:04PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Please read it, and make your own opinions on where I'm right and where
> > I'm wrong, even if you might not agree with my opinions on other i
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 09:51:55PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 02:35:57AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > The problem with your pragmatic approach is that every of your users has
> > other packages he cares about. A package you care zero about might
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:53:36PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> > Today, it's only 17 days until the officially announced "aggressive goal"
> > for the release of Debian 3.1 [1]. That's a
aptop is two or three years old?
Debian 3.0 was mostly current at the time when it was released, but much
support for current hardware is missing in Debian 3.0 .
> > What are the unexpected delays in the dvelopment of debian-installer?
>
> I don't think that I implied that there
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 09:57:41AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 11:28:41PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 02:14:49AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > I'm not saying this would be immoral or something like that, but e.g. a
>
hes build errors and dependency
problems.
After three years of testing, it seems that some of the promises like
having testing always in a releasable state were never fulfilled, in
fact testing was sometimes in a worse state than unstable.
testing with its lack of security fixes, aprox. 500
ale-zh-cn
mozilla-locale-zh-hk
mozilla-locale-zh-tw
> Cheers,
> Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Yann Dirson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 07:29:29PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > There are some good suggestions in your proposal, e.g. you suggest to
> > check whether the build dependencies are fulfilled. The lack of checking
they were also used for a different
purpose.
> Regards,
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
ibs
Package: App2
Version: 1-1
Depends: some GNOME1-libs
unstable:
Package: App1
Version: 2-1
Depends: some GNOME2-libs
Package: App2
Version: 2-1
Depends: some GNOME2-libs
The way testing works, it's always possible for version 2-1 of App1 to
enter testing while testing still
to Gtk 1.2, you have to give an explicit configure
option to compile it with Gtk 2 .
> Thomas E. Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 11:04:05PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> if 'boot-loader' was not a real package (not sure if it requires a new
> catagory or if it fits under meta or virtual) and then when you did:
> apt-get install boot-loader
> it (dpkg or apt -- no
pat)?
Your lowering of the severity to get your broken package into testing
(it's now in testing...) is _not_ a solution.
cu
Adrian
--
You only think this is a free country. Like the US the UK spends a lot of
time explaining its a free country because it
source-2.4.18
cu
Adrian
[1] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/kernel-24.html
[2] http://security-archive.merton.ox.ac.uk/bugtraq-200211/0192.html
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
nvince me that my interpretation of your policy is
wrong I'll start filing bugs against packages that symlink
/usr/share/doc/ to the directory of another package.
cu
Adrian
BTW: I'm not subscribed to debian-devel.
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly o
rams that
don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines.
...
Thus, although non-free software isn't a part of Debian, we support its
use, and we provide infrastructure (such as our bug-tracking system and
mailing lists) for non-free software packages.
<-- snip -->
cu
Adrian
aintainer: Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: glibc
Version: 2.2.2-4
...
<-- snip -->
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
-2.4.3 (2.4.3-3 -> 2.4.3-4)
+ added a patch to umount in util-linux to prevent users from
umounting partitions root has mounted (when the user option
is set in /etc/fstab)
+ removed: usbmgr
cu
Adrian
[1] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/kernel-24.html
-
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Ben Burton wrote:
>...
> Of course there are no packages in Debian which use Gnome Basic either,
> since this is its first packaging.
You can compile gnumeric with support for Gnome Basic.
> Ben.
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen w
t the "Essential: yes" of perl-base
that makes sure that the package is always installed (as an example, mawk
is 'priority required' but not essential and I've removed it from my
system a long time ago).
> David
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
t's probably going to come up more and more
> as more developers become MIA over time.
Martin usually marks packages of MIA maintainers as orphaned. I think it's
better if a few persons take care of this instead of many more people
sending ITHs.
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die
-linux with the international kernel patch
+ removed: kernel-image-2.4.3-i386
+ removed: kernel-source-2.4.3
cu
Adrian
[1] http://www.fs.tum.de/~bunk/kernel-24.html
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
make a split in your upstream
development.
One argument for native packages is that you want to include the debian/
directory in your upstream package. You can do this even in non-native
packages and when you change nothing the .diff.gz will be empty - but it's
possible for you to change on
ckage that needs many kernel
headers (and the package in unstable compiles only with 2.4 kernel
headers). I do currently use the kernel haeaders libc6-dev ships. Would
it be the right solution to copy the 2.4.4 kernel headers into the package
and use them?
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge sch
oolize --force" to prevent a miscompilation of the libraries - it
would be much more easy when the programs would use a locally installed
libtool instead.
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die Dinge schwierig sind wagen wir sie nicht,
sondern weil wir sie nicht wagen sind sie schwierig.
gnome-chess
Vincent Renardias ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) gnumeric
Vincent Renardias ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) manpages-fr
Vincent Renardias ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) pwgen
Wichert Akkerman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) sed
<-- snip -->
cu
Adrian
--
Nicht w
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> ...
> >Oliver Elphick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) libpgsql
>
> This package is obsolete and should not be included in any release.
Please ask the ftp admins to remove the package from unstable (
201 - 300 of 1531 matches
Mail list logo
