ed
yet but will be in the near future.
If Oracle didn't invest so much in Linux on SPARC with the result of so many
improvements coming along, I would have never suggested to make sparc64
a Debian release architecture in the future.
PS: I will be meeting up with Oracle people at LinuxCon n
cently
also started to break cmake [1] because cmake does not expect any message
on stderr if a test has been successful.
Thus, can we get rid of this warning message, please?
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=851720
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian
to make some pressure. They wanted to do some analysis of
the hardware first.
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
queue processes updated packages first, then
starts building new, uncompiled packages. The idea is to give priority
to updates over new packages.
If you want, I can manually prioritize the fxlinuxprint package.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - g
re is a large user base around the Amiga
and Atari groups and it would therefore be not acceptable to remove
something that people use.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub..
ht away wanted to use the most
radical solution and now you tell me that I am aggressive. Great.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
feedback before filing a bug report.
In most cases, people will get a helpful answer as we have many
competent and motivated folks on the channel who are always open
to help.
So, I'd like to invite people to please just ask on #debian-ports
in the future before filing bug reports which cou
at we might be able to
restore.
Any support to help the machines back into service is appreciated.
Thanks,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG:
Hi!
On 05/18/2018 02:35 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> We are currently having a hardware problem with our fastest SPARC machine,
> the SPARC-T5, such that the machine is currently offline.
We have replaced the SPARC T5 with a SPARC 5240 (SPARC T2) for the
time being. The machine
ures [1] should remain part of unstable and
experimental and are very actively maintained by the Debian Ports team.
You can find us in #debian-ports on OFTC.
FWIW, we have our own instance of the transition tracker:
> https://ben.jrtc27.com/
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://buildd.debian.or
On 9/28/18 11:26 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 14:16 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> So, it's not always a purely technical decision whether a port
>> remains a release architecture. It's also often highly political and
>> someho
On 9/29/18 8:48 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-09-28 at 14:16 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> [...]
>> Furthermore, several of the ports are in very healthy condition and
>> even surpass some release architectures. The powerpc and ppc64 ports,
>> for exam
dge cases.
And as long people invest resources in ports like Hurd and kFreeBSD, x32
is the lesser burden to be worried about.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
I would mention sparc64 here as well, but there is actually a valid
blocker which is the lack of supply of new hardware for DSA).
Thanks for the insight!
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
g the characteristics of
the Tier I architectures but without any support and without the buildds
and porterboxes being maintained by DSA.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik
std::future was fixed a while ago by upstream. It now works on any target even
when there are no lock-free atomics in hardware.
See: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Btw, prior that, you would actually need at least ARMv7.
Adrian
> On Nov 9, 2017, at 6:40 PM, Sune Vuor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
* Package name: cen64-qt
Version : 0.0+gitMMDD
Upstream Author : Dan Hasting
* URL : https://github.com/dh4/cen64-qt
* License : BSD-3-clause
Programming Lang: C++
Description
On 02/25/2016 06:41 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> Packages are auto-removed from testing when they are RC-buggy.
> Could we do something similar in unstable, for Debian's ports?
We have a testing distribution in debian-ports?
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Gl
Hi!
Just as a heads-up: unixodbc is a transitive build dependency for
gcc-5, qt5, doxygen, dbus and many other important packages.
Thus, this bug needs to be addressed as soon as possible or
we will run into difficulties sooner or later!
Cheers,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adria
es:". You might
want to fix this silently on the next upload.
There is just really a long list of reverse dependencies which need
unixodbc directly or transitively which is why I started to get
worried.
Sorry,
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debia
t; and Friday, 1 July 2016.
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
scribed
in the Debian Wiki [2].
If there are any problems or questions, please don't hesitate to ask me
either on IRC (cbmuser) or via mail (as listed in [1]) and I'm happy to
help!
Thanks in advance for any package you may fix on sparc64!
Cheers,
Adrian
> [1] https://db.debian.org/m
Hi Andrey,
thanks a lot for the fast and already helpful reply!
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 16:03 +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 12:44:45PM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > (Please CC as I'm not subscribed to debian-devel)
>
> (this is ho
er nocheck nobench, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),)
/bin/sh -c "cd test/unit && pytest-3"
endif
However, that doesn't work and the tests still fail.
Does anyone have a suggestion how to solve? I would like to update the kiwi
package to the latest upstream version before
le different because we use
> --system-site-packages virtualenvs, but they can be a good way to deal
> with this.
Can you name any package using this mechanism so I can have a look?
I'm not really experienced with tox, so it would be great to have some
guidance in the form of sample
Hi Timo,
On Sat, 2024-10-26 at 10:15 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-10-25 at 22:19 +0200, Timo Röhling wrote:
> > I ran into this issue with old-style setuptools packages (i.e.,
> > packages with a setup.py); AFAIK the entry_points mechanism needs
> &
On Sat, 2024-10-26 at 11:08 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I just realized that this doesn't work because kiwi doesn't have a setup.py
> anymore but just uses pyproject.toml. Do you know how it works in this case?
OK, I just remove every custom override and let debhe
t;
>
> export PYBUILD_BEFORE_TEST=\
> {interpreter} setup.py egg_info; \
> cp -r {dir}/src/*.egg-info {build_dir}
>
> export PYBUILD_AFTER_TEST=\
> rm -r {dir}/src/*.egg-info {build_dir}/*.egg-info
Thanks, this is what I was looking for. I will give this a try.
eam integration in the official Rust compiler is
rather slow unfortunately.
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
I solved my problem: I'd also upgraded smail and the new version
wasn't prodding my ISP. I needed to reconfigure Smail using
the smailconfig --force option. The default method of starting
from inetd didn't work for me: I now have a smail daemon running
and it works perfectly. Hope this helps any
Subject says it all: newest version of smail is refusing to parse
the config file so is failing to work. I may be able to send
this: I may not receive it back.
Andy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
1501 - 1531 of 1531 matches
Mail list logo
