Package: general
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.1.1
My understanding of the FHS would be that if a library is a dependency of a
binary in /bin or /sbin, then such library belongs in /lib, not
/usr/lib. (If
for some reason the library is also desired in /usr/lib then a sym link from
/li
Wow, if this sort of bug report is re-evoking questions on the whole
relevance of the historical FHS to modern distros, it does seem that
some real "soul searching" is in order on the part of the community as
far as the future of where people see Debian/GNU/Linux headed. "Begin
with the end in m
On 12/14/2011 04:43 PM, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
> [..]
>> The same argument applies to encryption. / and /usr both contain a
>> selection of programs, libraries etc. If you're encrypting one, why
>> would you not encrypt all of it?
>
> Speed.
>
> On one o
Ok, ok, ok, I think I may have got it. Some of your comments helped
get me on the proper track of distro-oriented thinking where different
systems are picking and choosing a different subset of available
packages, but those packages have predefined locations where they have
to put things. It has
4 matches
Mail list logo
