On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
>> > > I think x86-64 xen patches are going in for 2.6.27..
>
> Lenny will not support 64bit, no dom0.. so basicly lenny can only be used as
> a 32bit domU .. unl
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Nicolas Boullis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for asking a potentially stupid question, but how does the
> "Default-Start" keyword affect the bahvior of the system?
Refer to http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts for details. Maybe this
page should be updated
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This kernel have a critical problem:
>
> | Bad pte = 11764060, process = vsftpd, vm_flags = 100071, vaddr = b7f85000
> | Pid: 8129, comm: vsftpd Not tainted 2.6.26-1-xen-686 #1
> | [] handle_mm_fault+0x61b/0xe78
> | [] mp
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since Plink is younger than Putty, I think that the burden of the
> renaming is for us (the Debian Med packaging team). I plan to rename
> /usr/bin/plink to /usr/bin/Plink, that would be a symbolic link to
> /usr/lib/plin
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 06:07:11PM +0300, Teodor a écrit :
>> IMO a simple "Conflicts: putty-tools" is enough. If they provide the
>> same functionality than an "alternative" is b
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, if the functionality is different, it should be possible to install
> and use both at the same time.
Yes, this seems to be the rationale for this restriction in the policy.
Thanks
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Both programs are intended for command line, and could be used in
> scripts. We may even find users who want to install both at the same
> time. Very annoying…
>
> Since Plink is younger than Putty, I think that the burde
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Brian May
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steffen Möller wrote:
>> Teodor happened to have nicely explained my objections to rename plink.
>
> Except what he said is wrong, puttygen hasn't been renamed.
Yes, puttygen hasn't been ren
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Steffen Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charles Plessy schrieb:
>> Le Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 09:32:42AM +0200, Teodor a écrit :
>>> I still believe it is best to rename 'plink' to 'puttylink' in
>>> putty-t
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 16 février 2009 à 14:20 +, Matthew Johnson a écrit :
>> the FHS should certainly continue to exist and be coordinated between
>> distros though. I agree that if it needs taking over we should do so in
>> cooperation with the o
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Not going to happen: releasing DHCP leases is more important.
This could be done by calling dhclient3 with "-r" parameter somehow,
but it isn't even required by the protocol. Is this an acceptable
workarround for the desktop computers?
Thank
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> I personally would prefer ipv6 to still be a module so it can be
> blacklisted or some other way to disable it, but having this option on
> by default at least avoids many annoiances in ipv4 world.
I've always disabled IPv6 on all ho
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
> Carsten Hey writes ("Re: [RFC] disabled root account / distinct group for
> users with administrative privileges"):
>> A group named sudo or sudoroot is somehow linked to sudo as tool used to
>> gain administrative privileges. No one knows if
2011/5/5 Raphael Hertzog :
> On Thu, 05 May 2011, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> Also, having the unstable-next suite you've mention would tight more the
>> deployment of rolling to other project mechanisms, while the rest of the
>> proposal enjoyed much more decoupling.
>
> There's no reason why thi
2011/5/12 Charles Plessy :
> dpkg (subprocess): unable to execute rm command for cleanup (rm): No such
> file or directory
> dpkg: error while cleaning up:
> subprocess rm cleanup returned error exit status 2
> Could not exec dpkg!
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (100)
> E:
15 matches
Mail list logo
