On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Frederic Peters wrote:
> don't have tested yet. It would be a good idea to avoid duplicated work.
So why not linuxconf? AFAIK it's the most powerful conftool around and
there's *even* a .deb version of it. Further on it's pretty trivial to
write modules for it and once done yo
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
I intend to package it. This is my first task in order to become Debian
developer...
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Oh, I didn't mean _only_ sending the diff. It was an addendum
> to Shaleh's suggestion. The idea is to send the diff, then have
> someone else look at it, and then do the NMU.
You could just drop the NMUed package into some public space
(http://my.
Hi Arthur and discussion round,
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Arthur Korn wrote:
> So, basically, since auditd does feature encryption, it does not
> have any chance to be the default for log rotation, even if it
> was a lot better than logrotate? What giant pile of crap.
But what you could do is a virtu
Jerome wrote:
> Listen, I've packaged it in order to make available in debs for
> people willing to test it. Now, don't blame me about those gnome
> dependencies since
[...]
> Please note that did not ITPed it since I'm not sure people except
> from me are interested in such a browser. And It does
OK, thanks a lot, I'll take care of that, I hadn't realized, that my
email address was wrong. I'll correct that ASAP.
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> But if someone is willing to back-port a package, and to maintain it
> (fixing any bugs that may be reported against it), then why not make
> room on the archives for it?
Would there be any problem to just set up your own Debian-style site with
BTS and a
On 4 Sep 2001, Brian May wrote:
[...]
> MAILSYNC
Has been in use here for 9 months without a flaw...
>
> PROS:
[...]
> - can delete deleted messages (not tested).
...this feature works here.
> - can create and delete folders (not tested).
Dito.
[...]
> CONS:
>
> - upstream author seems to
Btw:
> http://melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk/~garabik/debian-utf8/HOWTO
Does not serve any pages to me - it's pingable though. If you've got
problems with that server you could put the HOWTO on the debian servers or
if that's a problem I'd gladly put it up at our site.
*t
Make sure you have ECN disabled on those bootdisks otherwise some people
will be finding out that to their surprise they are not able to download
their packages via the network. See the recent ECN thread.
*t
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> Dans un message du 05 sep à 14:37, Florian Weimer écrivait :
> > From a technical behavior, throwing away packets with unknown protocol
> > flags is perfectly acceptable in any case and even reasonable in some
> > environments.
>
> I would not call reas
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 12:56:18AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> >
> > It's not only *sites* that do not work with ECN. It's also *routers*. That
> > means if you have *one* router between you and your destination, that does
> > not
> > support EC
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> So *please* can we add something like:
>
> if ! grep /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn /etc/sysctl.conf >/dev/null;
> then echo sys/net/ipv4/tcp_ecn=0 >> /etc/sysctl.conf
> fi
>
> to the kernel-image-2.4.x postinst.
Which of course wi
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> Dans un message du 05 sep à 17:30, T.Pospisek's MailLists écrivait :
> > The question is only if devices should be programmed in order to know
> > the future and it's potential proposed stadards by the IETF. Mind you I
> &g
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Guillaume Morin wrote:
>
> > > Dans un message du 05 sep à 14:37, Florian Weimer écrivait :
> > > > From a technical behavior, th
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Routers aren't forced to support ECN (although it's in their interest) but
> they
> aren't allowed to drop ECN-flagged TCP packets.
>
> If you can't access a site, *they* need to fix their buggy router to be
> ECN-tolerant. If they don't do so, the
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Do *you* do that for all the things that don't work as they should?
>
> Yes, quite frankly. Personally, I use only Free Software and software
> that runs on top of Free OSes. Professionally, I work for an ISP, and
> we expect our vendors to live up t
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> But anyway - I agree that Debian should not be too conservative with
> regard to new networking technologies, so disabling ECN by default is
> not something I'd like to see happen. Give the user some short
> explanation and let him make the decision
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Alex Pennace wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 02:37:06PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Why should the default configuration be changed to account for the
> > > diminishing number of broken routers on the net?
> >
> > From a
Add versioning to debian packet management. Something like:
# apt-get install package
# # damn it broke my server again!!
# apt-get rewind package
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> I would like to propose to form an Apache (web server) task force to
> maintain the Apache packages currently maintained by Johnie Ingram
> (netgod) (and potentially related packages if the need arises). The
> current state of Apache and the recen
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> T.Pospisek's MailLists ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Ardo van Rangelrooij wrote:
> >
> > > I would like to propose to form an Apache (web server) task force to
> > > maintain the A
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, David Findlay wrote:
> Well can the debconf for automount please make it easy to configure it that
> way? The default config doesn't do anything like it, and the documentation is
> not clear on setting it up. Everyone runs around saying they want to make
> Debian easy for the
23 matches
Mail list logo
