Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Montag, 20. Januar 2014, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
>> As long as it is a modern SSD (years) or one of the old ones one with
>> a sandforce controller (OpenBSD dev let me know about that) then it
>> has a good 20% extra space above it's listed gigabytes reserved
>> unusable f
IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) wrote:
> On 11/16/18 3:14 PM, Kentaro Hayashi wrote:
>> package repository, sure we can change the project's setting, but
>> debian/.gitlab-ci.yml seems to be the proper default setting.
> i don't think there is any reason to use a (hidden) dotfile in the
> debian
Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Marco d'Itri - 23.12.18, 22:30:
>> On Dec 23, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
>>> I think I have seen this with either SLES or RHEL that they created
>>> symlinks for every binary in /bin and /sbin, pointing to the binary
>>> in /usr/bin and /usr/sbin. I did not understand
Thomas Koch wrote:
> We're trying to package nix. Its d/control[1] currently says:
> build-depends: libcurl4-gnutls-dev | libcurl4-openssl-dev | libcurl-ssl-dev
> When I build it on my own machines with sbuild, then it gets built
> with libcurl4-gnutls-dev. On salsa it gets built with
> libcurl
Sven Hartge wrote:
> I changed the resolver to use a combination of mk-build-deps and
> aptitude, the same as sbuild and pbuilder use to resolve build-deps, to
> better handle alternatives.
> You may have hid an edge case I didn't encounter during my testing.
Hmm, I may see th
Sven Hartge wrote:
> Sven Hartge wrote:
>> I changed the resolver to use a combination of mk-build-deps and
>> aptitude, the same as sbuild and pbuilder use to resolve build-deps, to
>> better handle alternatives.
>> You may have hid an edge case I didn't encoun
Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
> I've read this section many times over but I don't get it. A
> workaround is presented but since we are on a new debhelper it is
> advised not to be used. It suggests using
> /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk but since we already call default.mk the
> buildflags.mk should be
Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: utf-8, 11 lines --]
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 09:07:06PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> CMake is a bit "special" in that regard. To get the right hardening
>> flags to work for some parts
On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 19:32:04 -0600 Mark Hutchison
wrote:
> When I look at systemctl for the dhclient service, I can see that there's
> an error, "can't create /var/lib/dhcp/dhclient.intname.leases Read Only
> file system", and then the DHCPREQUEST > DHCPACK > DHCPDECLINE sequence
> starts every f
Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> I am guessing that the reason for the "wontfix" is "that's just how
> Unix works unfortunately" aka "that's a Unix design bug"? Is my guess
> correct?
I would call it a "Unix design decision" or even an "OS design
decision", because Windows (of the NT variant) has made th
Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I've started a wiki about block alignment issues:
> https://wiki.debian.org/DiskBlockAlignment
> Can anybody comment on specific packages / tools that may help people
> investigate or update their systems, maybe adding links to the wiki?
There is also an interesting "wri
Hi all!
I just saw the new conntrack-tools (1:1.4.4-2) package in Sid, which
has as a change
* [917beed] conntrackd: get rid of the sysvinit support
and I wondered, if this is a bug (and at what severity) or not.
While I run all my personal computers on systemd (on Sid) and nearly all
servers
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 07, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Thats nice for any environment where on can freely define that
>> everything works like this.
>>
>> Unfortunately real world doesnt work like it.
> Can you describe some examples of what still requires 1.0/1.1 on a
> client or a server?
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 09, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Looking at https://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html
>> there is still a marketshare of ~25% of smartphones based on Android
>> 5.0 and 5.1 and 16% based on 4.4. So this change would (at the
>&g
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 11, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> but I see on your link that Android pre-5.x still has a ~25% market
>> share, so unless it will drop a lot in the next year I do not think
>> that we can cut them off from Debian-based web servers.
> OTOH if the PCI council says that TLS <
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 01:34:53PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Marco d'Itri wrote:
>>> On Aug 09, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> >> Looking at https://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html
>> >> there is still a mark
Christian Seiler wrote:
> Don't get me wrong: I do believe it's a huge problem that vendors of
> said appliances don't provide updates for these kind of things, and I
> wish that we could indeed drop everything except TLS 1.2, but the real
> world is unfortunately more complicated, and I think De
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> [1] I haven't investigated how widespread this specific problem
> actually is, or whether it can be mitigated - the point is that
> it is unrelated to TLS versions supported by PayPal or online
> banking apps running on the device
I asked on the freeradius-user
Luca Capello wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 14:59:53 -0500, James McCoy wrote:
>> People seem to be skipping over the fact that even after ntfs-3g was
>> installed, the user only had RO access. That's the bigger issue.
> Exactly, which IIRC is the normal behavior if the NTFS filesystem was
> not
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2017-12-01 at 16:44, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Luca Capello wrote:
>>> On Fri, 01 Dec 2017 14:59:53 -0500, James McCoy wrote:
>>>> People seem to be skipping over the fact that even after ntfs-3g
>>>> was installed, the u
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:22 AM, Marc Haber wrote:
>> Debian is also about providing an Universal Operating System, and I
>> have seen BIG installations of Debian on server farms moving to
>> PragBF because the Broadcom network chips on those servers required
>> people jumping t
Josef Masek wrote:
> it is possible to add package "vlan" to the DVD instalation images?
> It is tiny package (36kB) and in some special environment (without
> Internet with DVD in vmware environmen) i have to download and install
> it manually.
Why? The vlan package is not needed since at least
Pascal Giard wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Sven Hartge wrote:
>> Josef Masek wrote:
>>> it is possible to add package "vlan" to the DVD instalation images?
>>> It is tiny package (36kB) and in some special environment (without
>>> Int
23 matches
Mail list logo
